胰十二指肠切除术类型的当前趋势:重点介绍机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术的进展,连续病例数达 630 例。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mirang Lee, Yoon Soo Chae, Seulah Park, Won-Gun Yun, Hye-Sol Jung, Youngmin Han, Wooil Kwon, Joon Seong Park, Jin-Young Jang
{"title":"胰十二指肠切除术类型的当前趋势:重点介绍机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术的进展,连续病例数达 630 例。","authors":"Mirang Lee, Yoon Soo Chae, Seulah Park, Won-Gun Yun, Hye-Sol Jung, Youngmin Han, Wooil Kwon, Joon Seong Park, Jin-Young Jang","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex abdominal surgery, and the adoption of robotic PD has been on the rise because of its numerous benefits. This study aimed to investigate the current PD trends, focusing on advancements in robotic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2015 and 2023, 1231 patients underwent open PD, whereas 630 underwent robot-assisted PD (RAPD). Demographics and surgical outcomes were analyzed according to the time period. Moreover, a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of RAPD cases gradually increased from 6.3% in 2015 to 50.9% in 2020, reaching a plateau of >50% thereafter. The proportion of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased during the late period (11.4% vs. 17.6%), with many of these patients undergoing open PD. Additionally, RAPD was performed in patients with a high probability of postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, the two groups demonstrated no significant difference in the occurrence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (10.6% vs. 9.5%, p = .532). Among periampullary cancer cases, RAPD demonstrated comparable survival outcomes to open PD after PSM (5-year survival rate: 61.8% vs. 49.8%, p = .189).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RAPD has become a stable approach, accounting for over 50% of all PD cases in high-volume centers, and it can be safely performed. However, open PD remains important owing to the development of neoadjuvant therapy and the aging population. Therefore, establishing appropriate indications to maximize the benefits of both RAPD and open PD is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current trends in types of pancreatoduodenectomy: Focus on the advancement of robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy with 630 consecutive cases.\",\"authors\":\"Mirang Lee, Yoon Soo Chae, Seulah Park, Won-Gun Yun, Hye-Sol Jung, Youngmin Han, Wooil Kwon, Joon Seong Park, Jin-Young Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbp.12086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex abdominal surgery, and the adoption of robotic PD has been on the rise because of its numerous benefits. This study aimed to investigate the current PD trends, focusing on advancements in robotic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2015 and 2023, 1231 patients underwent open PD, whereas 630 underwent robot-assisted PD (RAPD). Demographics and surgical outcomes were analyzed according to the time period. Moreover, a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of RAPD cases gradually increased from 6.3% in 2015 to 50.9% in 2020, reaching a plateau of >50% thereafter. The proportion of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased during the late period (11.4% vs. 17.6%), with many of these patients undergoing open PD. Additionally, RAPD was performed in patients with a high probability of postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, the two groups demonstrated no significant difference in the occurrence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (10.6% vs. 9.5%, p = .532). Among periampullary cancer cases, RAPD demonstrated comparable survival outcomes to open PD after PSM (5-year survival rate: 61.8% vs. 49.8%, p = .189).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RAPD has become a stable approach, accounting for over 50% of all PD cases in high-volume centers, and it can be safely performed. However, open PD remains important owing to the development of neoadjuvant therapy and the aging population. Therefore, establishing appropriate indications to maximize the benefits of both RAPD and open PD is necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12086\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胰十二指肠切除术(PD)是一种复杂的腹部手术,由于其优点众多,机器人胰十二指肠切除术的应用呈上升趋势。本研究旨在调查当前胰十二指肠切除术的发展趋势,重点关注机器人手术的进展:2015年至2023年间,1231名患者接受了开腹腹腔镜手术,630名患者接受了机器人辅助腹腔镜手术(RAPD)。根据时间段分析了人口统计学和手术结果。此外,还进行了倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析,以评估临床结果:RAPD病例的比例从2015年的6.3%逐渐增加到2020年的50.9%,之后达到了>50%的高点。在后期,接受新辅助化疗的患者比例有所增加(11.4% vs. 17.6%),其中许多患者接受了开放性腹腔镜手术。此外,术后胰瘘可能性高的患者也进行了 RAPD。然而,两组患者在临床相关的术后胰瘘发生率上没有明显差异(10.6% vs. 9.5%,P = .532)。在胰周癌病例中,RAPD与PSM术后开放式胰腺切除术的生存率相当(5年生存率:61.8% vs. 49.8%,p = .189):结论:RAPD已成为一种稳定的方法,在大容量中心的所有PD病例中占50%以上,而且可以安全地进行。然而,由于新辅助治疗的发展和人口老龄化,开放式腹腔镜手术仍然很重要。因此,有必要确立适当的适应症,以最大限度地发挥 RAPD 和开放式 PD 的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current trends in types of pancreatoduodenectomy: Focus on the advancement of robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy with 630 consecutive cases.

Background: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex abdominal surgery, and the adoption of robotic PD has been on the rise because of its numerous benefits. This study aimed to investigate the current PD trends, focusing on advancements in robotic surgery.

Methods: Between 2015 and 2023, 1231 patients underwent open PD, whereas 630 underwent robot-assisted PD (RAPD). Demographics and surgical outcomes were analyzed according to the time period. Moreover, a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical outcomes.

Results: The proportion of RAPD cases gradually increased from 6.3% in 2015 to 50.9% in 2020, reaching a plateau of >50% thereafter. The proportion of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased during the late period (11.4% vs. 17.6%), with many of these patients undergoing open PD. Additionally, RAPD was performed in patients with a high probability of postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, the two groups demonstrated no significant difference in the occurrence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (10.6% vs. 9.5%, p = .532). Among periampullary cancer cases, RAPD demonstrated comparable survival outcomes to open PD after PSM (5-year survival rate: 61.8% vs. 49.8%, p = .189).

Conclusions: RAPD has become a stable approach, accounting for over 50% of all PD cases in high-volume centers, and it can be safely performed. However, open PD remains important owing to the development of neoadjuvant therapy and the aging population. Therefore, establishing appropriate indications to maximize the benefits of both RAPD and open PD is necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信