家庭粮食安全背景:南非 Ambros 村和 Maramanzhi 村的比较。

IF 3.4 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Heliyon Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39971
Felicity Aphiwe Mkhongi, Walter Musakwa, Tholang Mokhele
{"title":"家庭粮食安全背景:南非 Ambros 村和 Maramanzhi 村的比较。","authors":"Felicity Aphiwe Mkhongi, Walter Musakwa, Tholang Mokhele","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smallholder agriculture plays a crucial role in achieving food security, particularly at the household level. However, fallow fields are progressively increasing in former homelands of South Africa. While substantial efforts have been devoted towards addressing food insecurity, access to arable land has not translated to sustainable crop production for smallholder farmers in former homelands of the country. This paper analyses household food security in the context of deagrarianization in two villages, Ambros (Eastern Cape) and Maramanzhi (Limpopo). Using a mixed-method approach, a total of 106 semi-structured questionnaires were administered through face-to-face interviews with household heads. Descriptive statistics were analysed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 27.0 computer program. Meanwhile, qualitative data was coded and content analysis was conducted on NVivo 12 software. The key findings revealed that the primary household income in the study area was earned from social grants. Furthermore, home gardens, with an average size of 4100m2 in Ambros and 4400m2 in Maramanzhi village, played a crucial role in supporting household crop production. However, food insecurity threatened the sustainability of rural livelihoods because the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) indicator highlighted that a majority of 54% of households in Ambros and 69% in Maramanzhi were mildly food insecure. Food insecurity challenges varied between the two villages but these were mainly perpetuated by food shortages caused by insufficient monthly income and waning household crop production. Although acquiring food was rated as a very important reason for cultivating in both villages, deagrarianization eroded opportunities for increased crop production. Among other solutions, this study recommends that the government improve the delivery of basic services such as water to promote household crop production and the revitalization of fallow fields. These transformations can potentially enhance food security, income and employment opportunities for rural households, contributing to the sustainability of rural livelihoods.</p>","PeriodicalId":12894,"journal":{"name":"Heliyon","volume":"10 21","pages":"e39971"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household food security contextualised: A comparison of Ambros and Maramanzhi villages, South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Felicity Aphiwe Mkhongi, Walter Musakwa, Tholang Mokhele\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Smallholder agriculture plays a crucial role in achieving food security, particularly at the household level. However, fallow fields are progressively increasing in former homelands of South Africa. While substantial efforts have been devoted towards addressing food insecurity, access to arable land has not translated to sustainable crop production for smallholder farmers in former homelands of the country. This paper analyses household food security in the context of deagrarianization in two villages, Ambros (Eastern Cape) and Maramanzhi (Limpopo). Using a mixed-method approach, a total of 106 semi-structured questionnaires were administered through face-to-face interviews with household heads. Descriptive statistics were analysed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 27.0 computer program. Meanwhile, qualitative data was coded and content analysis was conducted on NVivo 12 software. The key findings revealed that the primary household income in the study area was earned from social grants. Furthermore, home gardens, with an average size of 4100m2 in Ambros and 4400m2 in Maramanzhi village, played a crucial role in supporting household crop production. However, food insecurity threatened the sustainability of rural livelihoods because the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) indicator highlighted that a majority of 54% of households in Ambros and 69% in Maramanzhi were mildly food insecure. Food insecurity challenges varied between the two villages but these were mainly perpetuated by food shortages caused by insufficient monthly income and waning household crop production. Although acquiring food was rated as a very important reason for cultivating in both villages, deagrarianization eroded opportunities for increased crop production. Among other solutions, this study recommends that the government improve the delivery of basic services such as water to promote household crop production and the revitalization of fallow fields. These transformations can potentially enhance food security, income and employment opportunities for rural households, contributing to the sustainability of rural livelihoods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heliyon\",\"volume\":\"10 21\",\"pages\":\"e39971\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567040/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heliyon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39971\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heliyon","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39971","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小农农业在实现粮食安全方面发挥着至关重要的作用,尤其是在家庭层面。然而,在南非的前家园,休耕地正在逐步增加。虽然为解决粮食不安全问题做出了巨大努力,但对于南非前家园的小农来说,获得可耕地并没有转化为可持续的作物生产。本文分析了 Ambros(东开普省)和 Maramanzhi(林波波省)两个村庄在非土地化背景下的家庭粮食安全问题。本文采用混合方法,通过与户主进行面对面访谈,共发放了 106 份半结构式问卷。使用 IBM SPSS 统计 27.0 计算机程序对描述性统计数据进行了分析。同时,还使用 NVivo 12 软件对定性数据进行了编码和内容分析。主要研究结果显示,研究地区的主要家庭收入来自社会补助金。此外,家庭菜园在支持家庭作物生产方面发挥了至关重要的作用,安布罗斯村和马拉曼芝村的家庭菜园平均面积分别为 4100 平方米和 4400 平方米。然而,粮食不安全威胁着农村生计的可持续性,因为家庭粮食不安全状况量表(HFIAS)指标显示,安布罗斯 54% 的大多数家庭和马拉曼芝 69% 的家庭存在轻度粮食不安全问题。两个村庄面临的粮食不安全挑战各不相同,但主要是由于月收入不足和家庭作物产量减少造成的粮食短缺。虽然在这两个村庄,获得食物被认为是耕种的一个非常重要的原因,但非土地化侵蚀了增加作物产量的机会。除其他解决方案外,本研究还建议政府改善供水等基本服务的提供,以促进家庭作物生产和休耕地的恢复。这些转变有可能提高农村家庭的粮食安全、收入和就业机会,从而促进农村生计的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Household food security contextualised: A comparison of Ambros and Maramanzhi villages, South Africa.

Smallholder agriculture plays a crucial role in achieving food security, particularly at the household level. However, fallow fields are progressively increasing in former homelands of South Africa. While substantial efforts have been devoted towards addressing food insecurity, access to arable land has not translated to sustainable crop production for smallholder farmers in former homelands of the country. This paper analyses household food security in the context of deagrarianization in two villages, Ambros (Eastern Cape) and Maramanzhi (Limpopo). Using a mixed-method approach, a total of 106 semi-structured questionnaires were administered through face-to-face interviews with household heads. Descriptive statistics were analysed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 27.0 computer program. Meanwhile, qualitative data was coded and content analysis was conducted on NVivo 12 software. The key findings revealed that the primary household income in the study area was earned from social grants. Furthermore, home gardens, with an average size of 4100m2 in Ambros and 4400m2 in Maramanzhi village, played a crucial role in supporting household crop production. However, food insecurity threatened the sustainability of rural livelihoods because the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) indicator highlighted that a majority of 54% of households in Ambros and 69% in Maramanzhi were mildly food insecure. Food insecurity challenges varied between the two villages but these were mainly perpetuated by food shortages caused by insufficient monthly income and waning household crop production. Although acquiring food was rated as a very important reason for cultivating in both villages, deagrarianization eroded opportunities for increased crop production. Among other solutions, this study recommends that the government improve the delivery of basic services such as water to promote household crop production and the revitalization of fallow fields. These transformations can potentially enhance food security, income and employment opportunities for rural households, contributing to the sustainability of rural livelihoods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heliyon
Heliyon MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
2793
期刊介绍: Heliyon is an all-science, open access journal that is part of the Cell Press family. Any paper reporting scientifically accurate and valuable research, which adheres to accepted ethical and scientific publishing standards, will be considered for publication. Our growing team of dedicated section editors, along with our in-house team, handle your paper and manage the publication process end-to-end, giving your research the editorial support it deserves.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信