在心脏植入式电子设备植入过程中采用无腔起搏导线鞘引导法进行心内膜活检的可行性和安全性。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yang Ye, Youyou Chen, Hao Jiang, Jiling Zeng, Xingchen Wang, Ying Yang, Xiang Lan Liu, XuLin Hong, Bei Wang, Ya Xun Sun, Dongwu Lai, Xi-Qi Xu, Guo-Sheng Fu
{"title":"在心脏植入式电子设备植入过程中采用无腔起搏导线鞘引导法进行心内膜活检的可行性和安全性。","authors":"Yang Ye, Youyou Chen, Hao Jiang, Jiling Zeng, Xingchen Wang, Ying Yang, Xiang Lan Liu, XuLin Hong, Bei Wang, Ya Xun Sun, Dongwu Lai, Xi-Qi Xu, Guo-Sheng Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) indication are complicated with special cardiomyopathy or other unspecified cardiac abnormalities and may need endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). However, EMB by a bioptome is usually avoided to reduce the risk of lead displacement in the CIED peri-procedural period.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of a novel approach for transvenous right ventricular (RV) EMB using the lead-sheath method (L-S-M) during CIED implantation and compared it to the traditional bioptome method (T-B-M).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive eighty patients referred for EMB were enrolled. In the L-S-M group, a sheath with a lumenless pacing lead was positioned toward the middle to apical interventricular septum under fluoroscopy (n=60). The CIED implantation was performed through the same venous access site. In the T-B-M group, a bioptome was used (n=20). The clinical characteristics, procedural details, success rate and complications were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>380 RV EMBs procedures were performed with comparable 4.1±0.8 in the L-S-M group and 3.8±0.8 samples/patient in the T-B-M group. In the L-S-M group, seven (11.7%) patients experienced minor complications with 3 transient right bundle branch block, 2 transient atrioventricular block (AVB) and 2 regional minor device pocket hematomas. In the T-B-M group, three (15%) experienced one temporary pacing for transient AVB, one chest discomfort and one regional hematoma. No cardiac tamponade was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RV EMB by the innovative L-S-M method is technically feasible, safe and can yield valuable and early diagnostic insights for patients who are candidates for CIEDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The feasibility and safety of Endomyocardial Biopsy by lumenless pacing lead-sheath directed method during the Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device implantation.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Ye, Youyou Chen, Hao Jiang, Jiling Zeng, Xingchen Wang, Ying Yang, Xiang Lan Liu, XuLin Hong, Bei Wang, Ya Xun Sun, Dongwu Lai, Xi-Qi Xu, Guo-Sheng Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) indication are complicated with special cardiomyopathy or other unspecified cardiac abnormalities and may need endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). However, EMB by a bioptome is usually avoided to reduce the risk of lead displacement in the CIED peri-procedural period.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of a novel approach for transvenous right ventricular (RV) EMB using the lead-sheath method (L-S-M) during CIED implantation and compared it to the traditional bioptome method (T-B-M).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive eighty patients referred for EMB were enrolled. In the L-S-M group, a sheath with a lumenless pacing lead was positioned toward the middle to apical interventricular septum under fluoroscopy (n=60). The CIED implantation was performed through the same venous access site. In the T-B-M group, a bioptome was used (n=20). The clinical characteristics, procedural details, success rate and complications were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>380 RV EMBs procedures were performed with comparable 4.1±0.8 in the L-S-M group and 3.8±0.8 samples/patient in the T-B-M group. In the L-S-M group, seven (11.7%) patients experienced minor complications with 3 transient right bundle branch block, 2 transient atrioventricular block (AVB) and 2 regional minor device pocket hematomas. In the T-B-M group, three (15%) experienced one temporary pacing for transient AVB, one chest discomfort and one regional hematoma. No cardiac tamponade was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RV EMB by the innovative L-S-M method is technically feasible, safe and can yield valuable and early diagnostic insights for patients who are candidates for CIEDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.018\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:具有心血管植入式电子装置(CIED)适应症的患者会合并特殊心肌病或其他不明心脏异常,可能需要进行心内膜活检(EMB)。然而,为了降低CIED围手术期导联线移位的风险,通常避免使用生物光电仪进行EMB:我们旨在评估在 CIED 植入过程中使用导联-鞘方法(L-S-M)进行经静脉右心室(RV)EMB 的新型方法的安全性和可行性,并将其与传统的生物光电眼方法(T-B-M)进行比较:方法:连续招募了80名转诊的EMB患者。在L-S-M组中,在透视下将带有无腔起搏导线的鞘定位在室间隔中部至顶部(n=60)。CIED植入手术通过同一静脉入口处进行。在T-B-M组中,使用的是生物光头(n=20)。对临床特征、手术细节、成功率和并发症进行了评估:结果:共进行了380例RV EMBs手术,L-S-M组为4.1±0.8例,T-B-M组为3.8±0.8例。在L-S-M组中,7例(11.7%)患者出现轻微并发症,其中3例为一过性右束支传导阻滞,2例为一过性房室传导阻滞(AVB),2例为区域性轻微器械袋血肿。在 T-B-M 组中,有 3 名患者(15%)因一过性房室传导阻滞而临时起搏,1 名患者出现胸部不适,1 名患者出现区域性血肿。未发现心脏填塞:通过创新的 L-S-M 方法进行 RV EMB 在技术上是可行的、安全的,而且可以为 CIEDs 候选患者提供有价值的早期诊断信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The feasibility and safety of Endomyocardial Biopsy by lumenless pacing lead-sheath directed method during the Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device implantation.

Background: Patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) indication are complicated with special cardiomyopathy or other unspecified cardiac abnormalities and may need endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). However, EMB by a bioptome is usually avoided to reduce the risk of lead displacement in the CIED peri-procedural period.

Objective: We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of a novel approach for transvenous right ventricular (RV) EMB using the lead-sheath method (L-S-M) during CIED implantation and compared it to the traditional bioptome method (T-B-M).

Methods: Consecutive eighty patients referred for EMB were enrolled. In the L-S-M group, a sheath with a lumenless pacing lead was positioned toward the middle to apical interventricular septum under fluoroscopy (n=60). The CIED implantation was performed through the same venous access site. In the T-B-M group, a bioptome was used (n=20). The clinical characteristics, procedural details, success rate and complications were evaluated.

Results: 380 RV EMBs procedures were performed with comparable 4.1±0.8 in the L-S-M group and 3.8±0.8 samples/patient in the T-B-M group. In the L-S-M group, seven (11.7%) patients experienced minor complications with 3 transient right bundle branch block, 2 transient atrioventricular block (AVB) and 2 regional minor device pocket hematomas. In the T-B-M group, three (15%) experienced one temporary pacing for transient AVB, one chest discomfort and one regional hematoma. No cardiac tamponade was detected.

Conclusions: RV EMB by the innovative L-S-M method is technically feasible, safe and can yield valuable and early diagnostic insights for patients who are candidates for CIEDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信