使用预防性网片预防腹股沟旁疝形成:系统综述、荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hernia Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1007/s10029-024-03219-1
David E Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Gal Saffati, Shane Kronstedt, Troy La, Madeline Chaput, Shubh Desai, Gustavo A Salgado-Garza, Sagar R Patel, Jackson Cathey, Jeremy R Slawin
{"title":"使用预防性网片预防腹股沟旁疝形成:系统综述、荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"David E Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Gal Saffati, Shane Kronstedt, Troy La, Madeline Chaput, Shubh Desai, Gustavo A Salgado-Garza, Sagar R Patel, Jackson Cathey, Jeremy R Slawin","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03219-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic mesh placement in reducing the incidence of parastomal hernias following colostomy, ileostomy, and ileal conduit formation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review identified relevant studies evaluating parastomal hernia incidence with prophylactic mesh use during stoma formation. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis using Bayesian modeling were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>25 studies, consisting of 16 randomized control trials (RCT), 6 follow up studies, and 3 retrospective cohort studies, were included. Prophylactic mesh led to significantly fewer parastomal hernias beyond 6 months follow-up (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33-0.58). Hernias were reduced with mesh for both ileal conduits and colostomies. When analyzing hazard ratios (HRs), only 6 studies were included, and a statistically significant difference was observed among both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (HR 0.75 [0.53, 0.92], p = 0.01) and non-RCTs (HR 0.57 [0.36, 0.92], p = 0.02). Network meta-analysis found the retromuscular approach with mesh had the lowest hernia rate. Regression was non-significant for variations between study types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrated prophylactic mesh placement during ostomy creation significantly reduced parastomal hernia risk, more prominently beyond 6 months, consistently across randomized trials and observational studies for urologic and gastrointestinal ostomies. The retromuscular technique was most effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia formation: a systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"David E Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Gal Saffati, Shane Kronstedt, Troy La, Madeline Chaput, Shubh Desai, Gustavo A Salgado-Garza, Sagar R Patel, Jackson Cathey, Jeremy R Slawin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10029-024-03219-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic mesh placement in reducing the incidence of parastomal hernias following colostomy, ileostomy, and ileal conduit formation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review identified relevant studies evaluating parastomal hernia incidence with prophylactic mesh use during stoma formation. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis using Bayesian modeling were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>25 studies, consisting of 16 randomized control trials (RCT), 6 follow up studies, and 3 retrospective cohort studies, were included. Prophylactic mesh led to significantly fewer parastomal hernias beyond 6 months follow-up (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33-0.58). Hernias were reduced with mesh for both ileal conduits and colostomies. When analyzing hazard ratios (HRs), only 6 studies were included, and a statistically significant difference was observed among both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (HR 0.75 [0.53, 0.92], p = 0.01) and non-RCTs (HR 0.57 [0.36, 0.92], p = 0.02). Network meta-analysis found the retromuscular approach with mesh had the lowest hernia rate. Regression was non-significant for variations between study types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrated prophylactic mesh placement during ostomy creation significantly reduced parastomal hernia risk, more prominently beyond 6 months, consistently across randomized trials and observational studies for urologic and gastrointestinal ostomies. The retromuscular technique was most effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hernia\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hernia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03219-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03219-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估在结肠造口术、回肠造口术和回肠导管形成术后,预防性放置网片在降低造口旁疝发病率方面的效果:一项系统性综述确定了评估造口形成过程中预防性使用网片导致的腹股沟旁疝发生率的相关研究。结果:共纳入 25 项研究,包括 16 项随机对照试验 (RCT)、6 项随访研究和 3 项回顾性队列研究。预防性网片使随访 6 个月后的腹股沟旁疝明显减少(OR 0.43,95% CI 0.33-0.58)。使用网片可减少回肠导管和结肠造口的疝气。在分析危险比(HRs)时,仅纳入了 6 项研究,在随机对照试验(RCTs)(HR 0.75 [0.53, 0.92],P = 0.01)和非 RCTs(HR 0.57 [0.36, 0.92],P = 0.02)之间观察到了显著的统计学差异。网络荟萃分析发现,使用网片的再肌层疗法的疝气发生率最低。不同研究类型之间的回归差异不显著:这项荟萃分析表明,在泌尿系统和胃肠道造口的随机试验和观察性研究中,造口术中预防性网片置入可显著降低造口旁疝的风险,6 个月后的风险更为突出。重肌技术最为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia formation: a systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis.

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic mesh placement in reducing the incidence of parastomal hernias following colostomy, ileostomy, and ileal conduit formation.

Methods: A systematic review identified relevant studies evaluating parastomal hernia incidence with prophylactic mesh use during stoma formation. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis using Bayesian modeling were performed.

Results: 25 studies, consisting of 16 randomized control trials (RCT), 6 follow up studies, and 3 retrospective cohort studies, were included. Prophylactic mesh led to significantly fewer parastomal hernias beyond 6 months follow-up (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33-0.58). Hernias were reduced with mesh for both ileal conduits and colostomies. When analyzing hazard ratios (HRs), only 6 studies were included, and a statistically significant difference was observed among both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (HR 0.75 [0.53, 0.92], p = 0.01) and non-RCTs (HR 0.57 [0.36, 0.92], p = 0.02). Network meta-analysis found the retromuscular approach with mesh had the lowest hernia rate. Regression was non-significant for variations between study types.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated prophylactic mesh placement during ostomy creation significantly reduced parastomal hernia risk, more prominently beyond 6 months, consistently across randomized trials and observational studies for urologic and gastrointestinal ostomies. The retromuscular technique was most effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信