Kang Heung Kim, Byong Kon Lee, Jeong Hun Nam, Soo Ah Lee, Jin Man Kim
{"title":"评估过氧化醋酸消毒剂的适当使用浓度及其对鸡肉外观的影响","authors":"Kang Heung Kim, Byong Kon Lee, Jeong Hun Nam, Soo Ah Lee, Jin Man Kim","doi":"10.5851/kosfa.2024.e97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the increase in consumer interest in food safety, in this study, we aimed to investigate the antibacterial effect of peraceic acid (A, B, and Daesung; 50-200 ppm) and sodium hypochlorite disinfectants on chicken carcasses and contaminated water, respectively, and changes in the appearance of chicken carcasses. Considering the antibacterial effect of each disinfectant concentration, the most significant antibacterial efficacy was observed for general bacteria and <i>Escherichia coli</i> at 200 ppm regardless of disinfectant type. Considering the disinfectant type at 200 ppm, sodium hypochlorite was the least effective, and peracetic acid A showed the highest antibacterial efficacy at all concentrations. In chicken carcasses, 200 ppm of peracetic acid A exhibited the highest bacterial reduction rates of 92.7% and 89.3% for general bacteria and <i>E. coli</i>, respectively; in contaminated water, 200 ppm of peracetic acid A exhibited a significantly higher reduction rate (p<0.05). <i>Salmonella</i> was negative throughout the experiment, and discoloration of the neck and tip was observed for peracetic acid A and peracetic acid (Daesung) at 100 ppm and peracetic acid B at 150 ppm. Sodium hypochlorite did not cause discoloration at any concentration. Flavor analysis indicated that 100 ppm of peracetic acid A exhibited olfactory characteristics similar to those of 100 or 150 ppm of sodium hypochlorite. In conclusion, 50 ppm of peracetic acid A was adequate for use in poultry processing plants.</p>","PeriodicalId":12459,"journal":{"name":"Food Science of Animal Resources","volume":"44 6","pages":"1403-1416"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Peroxidized Acetic Acid Disinfectant Proper Use Concentration and its Effect on Appearance of Chicken Carcasses.\",\"authors\":\"Kang Heung Kim, Byong Kon Lee, Jeong Hun Nam, Soo Ah Lee, Jin Man Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.5851/kosfa.2024.e97\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the increase in consumer interest in food safety, in this study, we aimed to investigate the antibacterial effect of peraceic acid (A, B, and Daesung; 50-200 ppm) and sodium hypochlorite disinfectants on chicken carcasses and contaminated water, respectively, and changes in the appearance of chicken carcasses. Considering the antibacterial effect of each disinfectant concentration, the most significant antibacterial efficacy was observed for general bacteria and <i>Escherichia coli</i> at 200 ppm regardless of disinfectant type. Considering the disinfectant type at 200 ppm, sodium hypochlorite was the least effective, and peracetic acid A showed the highest antibacterial efficacy at all concentrations. In chicken carcasses, 200 ppm of peracetic acid A exhibited the highest bacterial reduction rates of 92.7% and 89.3% for general bacteria and <i>E. coli</i>, respectively; in contaminated water, 200 ppm of peracetic acid A exhibited a significantly higher reduction rate (p<0.05). <i>Salmonella</i> was negative throughout the experiment, and discoloration of the neck and tip was observed for peracetic acid A and peracetic acid (Daesung) at 100 ppm and peracetic acid B at 150 ppm. Sodium hypochlorite did not cause discoloration at any concentration. Flavor analysis indicated that 100 ppm of peracetic acid A exhibited olfactory characteristics similar to those of 100 or 150 ppm of sodium hypochlorite. In conclusion, 50 ppm of peracetic acid A was adequate for use in poultry processing plants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Science of Animal Resources\",\"volume\":\"44 6\",\"pages\":\"1403-1416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564140/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Science of Animal Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2024.e97\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science of Animal Resources","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2024.e97","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着消费者对食品安全关注度的提高,本研究旨在调查过胃酸(A、B 和 Daesung;50-200 ppm)和次氯酸钠消毒剂分别对鸡屠体和污染水的抗菌效果,以及鸡屠体外观的变化。从各消毒剂浓度的抗菌效果来看,无论消毒剂类型如何,200 ppm 浓度的消毒剂对一般细菌和大肠杆菌的抗菌效果最显著。就 200 ppm 消毒剂类型而言,次氯酸钠的抗菌效果最差,而过氧乙酸 A 在所有浓度下的抗菌效果都最高。在鸡胴体中,200 ppm 的过氧乙酸 A 对一般细菌和大肠杆菌的杀灭率最高,分别为 92.7% 和 89.3%;在受污染的水中,200 ppm 的过氧乙酸 A 的杀灭率明显更高(在整个实验过程中,pSalmonella 均为阴性,100 ppm 的过氧乙酸 A 和过氧乙酸(Daesung)以及 150 ppm 的过氧乙酸 B 可观察到颈部和尖端变色。次氯酸钠在任何浓度下都不会导致褪色。风味分析表明,100 ppm 的过乙酸 A 与 100 或 150 ppm 的次氯酸钠具有相似的嗅觉特征。总之,50 ppm 的过乙酸 A 足以用于家禽加工厂。
Evaluation of Peroxidized Acetic Acid Disinfectant Proper Use Concentration and its Effect on Appearance of Chicken Carcasses.
With the increase in consumer interest in food safety, in this study, we aimed to investigate the antibacterial effect of peraceic acid (A, B, and Daesung; 50-200 ppm) and sodium hypochlorite disinfectants on chicken carcasses and contaminated water, respectively, and changes in the appearance of chicken carcasses. Considering the antibacterial effect of each disinfectant concentration, the most significant antibacterial efficacy was observed for general bacteria and Escherichia coli at 200 ppm regardless of disinfectant type. Considering the disinfectant type at 200 ppm, sodium hypochlorite was the least effective, and peracetic acid A showed the highest antibacterial efficacy at all concentrations. In chicken carcasses, 200 ppm of peracetic acid A exhibited the highest bacterial reduction rates of 92.7% and 89.3% for general bacteria and E. coli, respectively; in contaminated water, 200 ppm of peracetic acid A exhibited a significantly higher reduction rate (p<0.05). Salmonella was negative throughout the experiment, and discoloration of the neck and tip was observed for peracetic acid A and peracetic acid (Daesung) at 100 ppm and peracetic acid B at 150 ppm. Sodium hypochlorite did not cause discoloration at any concentration. Flavor analysis indicated that 100 ppm of peracetic acid A exhibited olfactory characteristics similar to those of 100 or 150 ppm of sodium hypochlorite. In conclusion, 50 ppm of peracetic acid A was adequate for use in poultry processing plants.
期刊介绍:
Food Science of Animal Resources (Food Sci. Anim. Resour.) is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research and review articles on scientific and technological aspects of chemistry, biotechnology, processing, engineering, and microbiology of meat, egg, dairy, and edible insect/worm products.