让团队合作发挥作用:加强高等教育中的团队合作与评估。

IF 2.8 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Nigel Francis, Connie Pritchard, Zoe Prytherch, Stephen Rutherford
{"title":"让团队合作发挥作用:加强高等教育中的团队合作与评估。","authors":"Nigel Francis,&nbsp;Connie Pritchard,&nbsp;Zoe Prytherch,&nbsp;Stephen Rutherford","doi":"10.1002/2211-5463.13936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ability to work in teams is one of the most sought-after graduate skills by employers. However, team-based learning activities, and especially team-based assessments, are commonly disliked (even actively avoided) by students. Team-based assessments are often problematic for students, mostly due to logistical problems and interpersonal difficulties. These difficulties often lead to dissatisfaction with the process and poor satisfaction responses in quality assessments of their teaching. This review takes a four-way approach to evaluate current approaches to team assessment aimed at enhancing student engagement, satisfaction and learning gain. Firstly, we identify why team-based activity is so important to include in our overall pedagogy in Higher Education. Secondly, we examine evidence from the literature on students' reactions to team-based activities (especially focusing on assessment) and the reasons for both positive and negative perceptions. The third focus is on identifying the root of the problem from a pedagogic perspective and highlighting the deficiencies in approaches to team-based activities that might lead to negative student perceptions. Finally, we discuss examples from the literature of where team-based learning and assessment activities have been successful. Approaches to team-based activities need to be more proactive and supportive so that students understand the dynamics of teams, how to plan team-based activities, and how to deal with interpersonal issues positively and productively. Team-based learning is arguably the least well-taught element of our curricula, yet it is important and straightforward to address.</p>","PeriodicalId":12187,"journal":{"name":"FEBS Open Bio","volume":"15 1","pages":"35-47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making teamwork work: enhancing teamwork and assessment in higher education\",\"authors\":\"Nigel Francis,&nbsp;Connie Pritchard,&nbsp;Zoe Prytherch,&nbsp;Stephen Rutherford\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/2211-5463.13936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The ability to work in teams is one of the most sought-after graduate skills by employers. However, team-based learning activities, and especially team-based assessments, are commonly disliked (even actively avoided) by students. Team-based assessments are often problematic for students, mostly due to logistical problems and interpersonal difficulties. These difficulties often lead to dissatisfaction with the process and poor satisfaction responses in quality assessments of their teaching. This review takes a four-way approach to evaluate current approaches to team assessment aimed at enhancing student engagement, satisfaction and learning gain. Firstly, we identify why team-based activity is so important to include in our overall pedagogy in Higher Education. Secondly, we examine evidence from the literature on students' reactions to team-based activities (especially focusing on assessment) and the reasons for both positive and negative perceptions. The third focus is on identifying the root of the problem from a pedagogic perspective and highlighting the deficiencies in approaches to team-based activities that might lead to negative student perceptions. Finally, we discuss examples from the literature of where team-based learning and assessment activities have been successful. Approaches to team-based activities need to be more proactive and supportive so that students understand the dynamics of teams, how to plan team-based activities, and how to deal with interpersonal issues positively and productively. Team-based learning is arguably the least well-taught element of our curricula, yet it is important and straightforward to address.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEBS Open Bio\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"35-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEBS Open Bio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2211-5463.13936\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEBS Open Bio","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2211-5463.13936","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

团队合作能力是最受雇主欢迎的毕业生技能之一。然而,以团队为基础的学习活动,尤其是以团队为基础的评估,通常不为学生所喜欢(甚至主动回避)。对学生来说,团队为基础的评估往往是个问题,主要是由于后勤问题和人际交往方面的困难。这些困难往往导致学生对教学过程不满意,对教学质量评估的满意度不高。本综述从四个方面来评估目前旨在提高学生参与度、满意度和学习收获的团队评估方法。首先,我们要明确为什么以团队为基础的活动在高等教育的整体教学法中如此重要。其次,我们从文献中研究了学生对团队活动(尤其是以评估为重点的活动)的反应,以及产生积极和消极看法的原因。第三个重点是从教学角度找出问题的根源,并强调可能导致学生负面看法的团队活动方法的不足之处。最后,我们讨论了文献中团队学习和评估活动取得成功的例子。团队活动的方法需要更加积极主动和支持性,以便学生了解团队的动态,如何规划团队活动,以及如何积极有效地处理人际关系问题。可以说,团队学习是我们的课程中最不擅长教授的内容,但它却非常重要,而且可以直接解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Making teamwork work: enhancing teamwork and assessment in higher education

Making teamwork work: enhancing teamwork and assessment in higher education

The ability to work in teams is one of the most sought-after graduate skills by employers. However, team-based learning activities, and especially team-based assessments, are commonly disliked (even actively avoided) by students. Team-based assessments are often problematic for students, mostly due to logistical problems and interpersonal difficulties. These difficulties often lead to dissatisfaction with the process and poor satisfaction responses in quality assessments of their teaching. This review takes a four-way approach to evaluate current approaches to team assessment aimed at enhancing student engagement, satisfaction and learning gain. Firstly, we identify why team-based activity is so important to include in our overall pedagogy in Higher Education. Secondly, we examine evidence from the literature on students' reactions to team-based activities (especially focusing on assessment) and the reasons for both positive and negative perceptions. The third focus is on identifying the root of the problem from a pedagogic perspective and highlighting the deficiencies in approaches to team-based activities that might lead to negative student perceptions. Finally, we discuss examples from the literature of where team-based learning and assessment activities have been successful. Approaches to team-based activities need to be more proactive and supportive so that students understand the dynamics of teams, how to plan team-based activities, and how to deal with interpersonal issues positively and productively. Team-based learning is arguably the least well-taught element of our curricula, yet it is important and straightforward to address.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FEBS Open Bio
FEBS Open Bio BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
173
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: FEBS Open Bio is an online-only open access journal for the rapid publication of research articles in molecular and cellular life sciences in both health and disease. The journal''s peer review process focuses on the technical soundness of papers, leaving the assessment of their impact and importance to the scientific community. FEBS Open Bio is owned by the Federation of European Biochemical Societies (FEBS), a not-for-profit organization, and is published on behalf of FEBS by FEBS Press and Wiley. Any income from the journal will be used to support scientists through fellowships, courses, travel grants, prizes and other FEBS initiatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信