用于诊断白尾鹿慢性消耗性疾病的免疫测定、基于微机电系统的生物传感器和 RT-QuIC 的比较研究。

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Estela Kobashigawa, Sura A Muhsin, Amjed Abdullah, Keara Allen, Emily A Sinnott, Michael Z Zhang, Sherri Russell, Mahmoud Almasri, Shuping Zhang
{"title":"用于诊断白尾鹿慢性消耗性疾病的免疫测定、基于微机电系统的生物传感器和 RT-QuIC 的比较研究。","authors":"Estela Kobashigawa, Sura A Muhsin, Amjed Abdullah, Keara Allen, Emily A Sinnott, Michael Z Zhang, Sherri Russell, Mahmoud Almasri, Shuping Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12917-024-04351-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a fatal transmissible spongiform encephalopathy in cervids. The disease is caused by a pathogenic prion, namely PrP<sup>Sc</sup>. Currently, diagnosis of CWD relies on IHC detection of PrP<sup>Sc</sup> in the obex or retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RPLN) or ELISA screening of obex and RPLN followed by IHC confirmation of positive results. In this study, we assessed the performance characteristics of two immunoassays: CWD Ag-ELISA and TeSeE ELISA, RT-QuIC, and MEMS biosensor via testing 30 CWD + and 30 CWD- white-tailed deer RPLN samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both CWD Ag-ELISA and TeSeE ELISA correctly identified all CWD + and CWD- samples. A greater intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) in S/P ratios was observed for the TeSeE ELISA (16.52%), compared to CWD Ag-ELISA (9.49%). However, the high CV did not affect the qualitative results of triplicate assays when the corresponding manufacturer's cutoff was used. The MEMS biosensor not only correctly identified all CWD + and CWD- RPLN samples, but also demonstrated a 100% detection rate for all CWD + samples at dilutions from 10<sup>- 0</sup> to 10<sup>- 3</sup>. Evaluation of RT-QuIC indicated that the rate of false negative reactions decreased from 21.98% at 10<sup>- 2</sup> dilution to 0% at 10<sup>- 4</sup> and 10<sup>- 5</sup> dilutions; and the rate of false positive reactions reduced from 56.42% at 10<sup>- 2</sup> dilution to 8.89% and 2.22% at 10<sup>- 4</sup> and 10<sup>- 5</sup> dilutions, respectively. Based on a stringent threshold of 2 x the first 10 fluorescent readings of each well and a final cutoff of 2/3 positive reactions for each sample, RT-QuIC correctly identified all positive and negative samples at 10<sup>- 4</sup> and 10<sup>- 5</sup> dilutions. Both MEMS biosensor and RT-QuIC achieved 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity under the experimental conditions described in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two immunoassays (CWD Ag-ELISA and TeSeE ELISA) performed comparably on white-tailed deer RPLN samples. MEMS biosensor is a reliable portable tool for CWD diagnosis and RT-QuIC can be used for routine testing of CWD if appropriate testing parameters and interpretive criteria are applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of immunoassays, a microelectromechanical systems-based biosensor, and RT-QuIC for the diagnosis of chronic wasting disease in white-tailed deer.\",\"authors\":\"Estela Kobashigawa, Sura A Muhsin, Amjed Abdullah, Keara Allen, Emily A Sinnott, Michael Z Zhang, Sherri Russell, Mahmoud Almasri, Shuping Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12917-024-04351-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a fatal transmissible spongiform encephalopathy in cervids. The disease is caused by a pathogenic prion, namely PrP<sup>Sc</sup>. Currently, diagnosis of CWD relies on IHC detection of PrP<sup>Sc</sup> in the obex or retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RPLN) or ELISA screening of obex and RPLN followed by IHC confirmation of positive results. In this study, we assessed the performance characteristics of two immunoassays: CWD Ag-ELISA and TeSeE ELISA, RT-QuIC, and MEMS biosensor via testing 30 CWD + and 30 CWD- white-tailed deer RPLN samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both CWD Ag-ELISA and TeSeE ELISA correctly identified all CWD + and CWD- samples. A greater intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) in S/P ratios was observed for the TeSeE ELISA (16.52%), compared to CWD Ag-ELISA (9.49%). However, the high CV did not affect the qualitative results of triplicate assays when the corresponding manufacturer's cutoff was used. The MEMS biosensor not only correctly identified all CWD + and CWD- RPLN samples, but also demonstrated a 100% detection rate for all CWD + samples at dilutions from 10<sup>- 0</sup> to 10<sup>- 3</sup>. Evaluation of RT-QuIC indicated that the rate of false negative reactions decreased from 21.98% at 10<sup>- 2</sup> dilution to 0% at 10<sup>- 4</sup> and 10<sup>- 5</sup> dilutions; and the rate of false positive reactions reduced from 56.42% at 10<sup>- 2</sup> dilution to 8.89% and 2.22% at 10<sup>- 4</sup> and 10<sup>- 5</sup> dilutions, respectively. Based on a stringent threshold of 2 x the first 10 fluorescent readings of each well and a final cutoff of 2/3 positive reactions for each sample, RT-QuIC correctly identified all positive and negative samples at 10<sup>- 4</sup> and 10<sup>- 5</sup> dilutions. Both MEMS biosensor and RT-QuIC achieved 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity under the experimental conditions described in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two immunoassays (CWD Ag-ELISA and TeSeE ELISA) performed comparably on white-tailed deer RPLN samples. MEMS biosensor is a reliable portable tool for CWD diagnosis and RT-QuIC can be used for routine testing of CWD if appropriate testing parameters and interpretive criteria are applied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Veterinary Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571681/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Veterinary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04351-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04351-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性消耗性疾病(CWD)是一种致命的颈鹿传染性海绵状脑病。该病由致病性朊病毒(即 PrPSc)引起。目前,对 CWD 的诊断依赖于 IHC 检测膀胱或咽后淋巴结 (RPLN) 中的 PrPSc,或对膀胱和咽后淋巴结进行 ELISA 筛查,然后对阳性结果进行 IHC 确认。在本研究中,我们评估了两种免疫测定方法的性能特征:通过检测 30 份 CWD + 和 30 份 CWD- 白尾鹿 RPLN 样本,评估了 CWD Ag-ELISA 和 TeSeE ELISA、RT-QuIC 以及 MEMS 生物传感器的性能特点:结果:CWD Ag-ELISA 和 TeSeE ELISA 都能正确鉴定所有 CWD + 和 CWD- 样品。与CWD Ag-ELISA(9.49%)相比,TeSeE ELISA(16.52%)的S/P比值的测定内变异系数(CV)更大。不过,在使用相应的制造商临界值时,高 CV 值并不影响一式三份检测的定性结果。MEMS 生物传感器不仅能正确识别所有 CWD + 和 CWD- RPLN 样品,而且在稀释度为 10- 0 至 10- 3 时,对所有 CWD + 样品的检出率均为 100%。对 RT-QuIC 的评估表明,假阴性反应率从 10- 2 稀释度时的 21.98% 降至 10- 4 和 10- 5 稀释度时的 0%;假阳性反应率从 10- 2 稀释度时的 56.42% 分别降至 10- 4 和 10- 5 稀释度时的 8.89% 和 2.22%。根据每孔前 10 个荧光读数 2 倍的严格阈值和每个样本 2/3 阳性反应的最终截止值,RT-QuIC 能正确识别 10- 4 和 10- 5 稀释度的所有阳性和阴性样本。在本研究描述的实验条件下,MEMS 生物传感器和 RT-QuIC 的灵敏度和特异性均达到 100%:结论:两种免疫测定(CWD Ag-ELISA 和 TeSeE ELISA)在白尾鹿 RPLN 样品上的表现相当。MEMS 生物传感器是诊断 CWD 的可靠便携式工具,如果采用适当的检测参数和解释标准,RT-QuIC 可用于 CWD 的常规检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of immunoassays, a microelectromechanical systems-based biosensor, and RT-QuIC for the diagnosis of chronic wasting disease in white-tailed deer.

Background: Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a fatal transmissible spongiform encephalopathy in cervids. The disease is caused by a pathogenic prion, namely PrPSc. Currently, diagnosis of CWD relies on IHC detection of PrPSc in the obex or retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RPLN) or ELISA screening of obex and RPLN followed by IHC confirmation of positive results. In this study, we assessed the performance characteristics of two immunoassays: CWD Ag-ELISA and TeSeE ELISA, RT-QuIC, and MEMS biosensor via testing 30 CWD + and 30 CWD- white-tailed deer RPLN samples.

Results: Both CWD Ag-ELISA and TeSeE ELISA correctly identified all CWD + and CWD- samples. A greater intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) in S/P ratios was observed for the TeSeE ELISA (16.52%), compared to CWD Ag-ELISA (9.49%). However, the high CV did not affect the qualitative results of triplicate assays when the corresponding manufacturer's cutoff was used. The MEMS biosensor not only correctly identified all CWD + and CWD- RPLN samples, but also demonstrated a 100% detection rate for all CWD + samples at dilutions from 10- 0 to 10- 3. Evaluation of RT-QuIC indicated that the rate of false negative reactions decreased from 21.98% at 10- 2 dilution to 0% at 10- 4 and 10- 5 dilutions; and the rate of false positive reactions reduced from 56.42% at 10- 2 dilution to 8.89% and 2.22% at 10- 4 and 10- 5 dilutions, respectively. Based on a stringent threshold of 2 x the first 10 fluorescent readings of each well and a final cutoff of 2/3 positive reactions for each sample, RT-QuIC correctly identified all positive and negative samples at 10- 4 and 10- 5 dilutions. Both MEMS biosensor and RT-QuIC achieved 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity under the experimental conditions described in this study.

Conclusions: The two immunoassays (CWD Ag-ELISA and TeSeE ELISA) performed comparably on white-tailed deer RPLN samples. MEMS biosensor is a reliable portable tool for CWD diagnosis and RT-QuIC can be used for routine testing of CWD if appropriate testing parameters and interpretive criteria are applied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Veterinary Research
BMC Veterinary Research VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信