将水蝇(Notonecta sp.)粉作为绵羊的替代蛋白质来源:对生产性能、营养摄入、氮平衡和发酵参数的影响。

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Lizbeth E. Robles Jimenez, Navid Ghavipanje, Manuela Renna, Octavio Alonso Castelán Ortega, Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez, Manuel Gonzalez-Ronquillo
{"title":"将水蝇(Notonecta sp.)粉作为绵羊的替代蛋白质来源:对生产性能、营养摄入、氮平衡和发酵参数的影响。","authors":"Lizbeth E. Robles Jimenez,&nbsp;Navid Ghavipanje,&nbsp;Manuela Renna,&nbsp;Octavio Alonso Castelán Ortega,&nbsp;Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez,&nbsp;Manuel Gonzalez-Ronquillo","doi":"10.1111/asj.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, the inclusion of water fly (<i>Notonecta</i> sp., NT) meal was compared with conventional protein sources such as soybean meal (SBM) and fish meal (FM) in diets destined for sheep, with specific reference to growth performance, nutrient intake, nitrogen balance, and in vitro rumen fermentation parameters. For 21 days, 18 male Suffolk lambs were randomly assigned to three experimental diets fed: (1) SBM at 130 g/kg dry matter (DM), as a plant-based protein diet; (2) FM at 50 g/kg DM, as an animal-based protein diet; and (3) NT at 60 g/kg DM, as an insect-based protein diet, for ad libitum feed intake. DM intake was similar among the treatments. The digestibility of DM (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and organic matter (<i>p</i> = 0.002) in the NT group was lower than that of SBM. In vitro rumen fermentation data showed that there were no differences between the treatments for DM degradation and the production of microbial crude protein. No differences were observed among the treatments in terms of enteric methane production. The NT diet produced the lowest NH<sub>3</sub>-N at hours 12 and 24 (<i>p</i> = 0.032 and 0.021, respectively). Overall, the dietary inclusion of NT for fattening lambs could be an alternative feeding strategy without deleterious effects on animal performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7890,"journal":{"name":"Animal Science Journal","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dietary water fly (Notonecta sp.) meal as an alternative protein source for sheep: Effects on performance, nutrient intake, nitrogen balance, and fermentation parameters\",\"authors\":\"Lizbeth E. Robles Jimenez,&nbsp;Navid Ghavipanje,&nbsp;Manuela Renna,&nbsp;Octavio Alonso Castelán Ortega,&nbsp;Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez,&nbsp;Manuel Gonzalez-Ronquillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/asj.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this study, the inclusion of water fly (<i>Notonecta</i> sp., NT) meal was compared with conventional protein sources such as soybean meal (SBM) and fish meal (FM) in diets destined for sheep, with specific reference to growth performance, nutrient intake, nitrogen balance, and in vitro rumen fermentation parameters. For 21 days, 18 male Suffolk lambs were randomly assigned to three experimental diets fed: (1) SBM at 130 g/kg dry matter (DM), as a plant-based protein diet; (2) FM at 50 g/kg DM, as an animal-based protein diet; and (3) NT at 60 g/kg DM, as an insect-based protein diet, for ad libitum feed intake. DM intake was similar among the treatments. The digestibility of DM (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and organic matter (<i>p</i> = 0.002) in the NT group was lower than that of SBM. In vitro rumen fermentation data showed that there were no differences between the treatments for DM degradation and the production of microbial crude protein. No differences were observed among the treatments in terms of enteric methane production. The NT diet produced the lowest NH<sub>3</sub>-N at hours 12 and 24 (<i>p</i> = 0.032 and 0.021, respectively). Overall, the dietary inclusion of NT for fattening lambs could be an alternative feeding strategy without deleterious effects on animal performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Science Journal\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Science Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asj.70006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asj.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究比较了在绵羊日粮中添加水蝇(Notonecta sp.,NT)粉与传统蛋白质来源(如豆粕(SBM)和鱼粉(FM))的效果,特别关注了生长性能、营养摄入量、氮平衡和体外瘤胃发酵参数。将 18 只雄性萨福克羔羊随机分配到三种试验日粮中饲喂 21 天:(1) 130 克/千克干物质 (DM) 的 SBM,作为植物性蛋白质日粮;(2) 50 克/千克 DM 的 FM,作为动物性蛋白质日粮;(3) 60 克/千克 DM 的 NT,作为昆虫性蛋白质日粮,自由采食。各处理的DM摄入量相似。NT组的DM消化率(p = 0.006)和有机物消化率(p = 0.002)低于SBM组。体外瘤胃发酵数据显示,各处理之间的 DM 降解和微生物粗蛋白产量没有差异。在肠道甲烷产量方面,各处理之间也未观察到差异。在第 12 小时和第 24 小时,NT 日粮产生的 NH3-N 最低(p = 0.032 和 0.021)。总之,在育肥羔羊日粮中添加 NT 可作为一种替代饲喂策略,且不会对动物的生产性能产生有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dietary water fly (Notonecta sp.) meal as an alternative protein source for sheep: Effects on performance, nutrient intake, nitrogen balance, and fermentation parameters

In this study, the inclusion of water fly (Notonecta sp., NT) meal was compared with conventional protein sources such as soybean meal (SBM) and fish meal (FM) in diets destined for sheep, with specific reference to growth performance, nutrient intake, nitrogen balance, and in vitro rumen fermentation parameters. For 21 days, 18 male Suffolk lambs were randomly assigned to three experimental diets fed: (1) SBM at 130 g/kg dry matter (DM), as a plant-based protein diet; (2) FM at 50 g/kg DM, as an animal-based protein diet; and (3) NT at 60 g/kg DM, as an insect-based protein diet, for ad libitum feed intake. DM intake was similar among the treatments. The digestibility of DM (p = 0.006) and organic matter (p = 0.002) in the NT group was lower than that of SBM. In vitro rumen fermentation data showed that there were no differences between the treatments for DM degradation and the production of microbial crude protein. No differences were observed among the treatments in terms of enteric methane production. The NT diet produced the lowest NH3-N at hours 12 and 24 (p = 0.032 and 0.021, respectively). Overall, the dietary inclusion of NT for fattening lambs could be an alternative feeding strategy without deleterious effects on animal performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Science Journal
Animal Science Journal 生物-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Animal Science Journal (a continuation of Animal Science and Technology) is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Animal Science (JSAS) and publishes Original Research Articles (full papers and rapid communications) in English in all fields of animal and poultry science: genetics and breeding, genetic engineering, reproduction, embryo manipulation, nutrition, feeds and feeding, physiology, anatomy, environment and behavior, animal products (milk, meat, eggs and their by-products) and their processing, and livestock economics. Animal Science Journal will invite Review Articles in consultations with Editors. Submission to the Journal is open to those who are interested in animal science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信