使用阿尔伯塔卒中计划静脉相 CT 早期 CT 评分预测血管内血栓切除术后急性缺血性卒中患者的最终梗死面积和临床预后。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zi-Xin Yin, Guang-Chen Shen, Wen-Jing Ni, Shan-Shan Lu, Sheng Liu, Hai-Bin Shi, Xiao-Quan Xu, Fei-Yun Wu
{"title":"使用阿尔伯塔卒中计划静脉相 CT 早期 CT 评分预测血管内血栓切除术后急性缺血性卒中患者的最终梗死面积和临床预后。","authors":"Zi-Xin Yin, Guang-Chen Shen, Wen-Jing Ni, Shan-Shan Lu, Sheng Liu, Hai-Bin Shi, Xiao-Quan Xu, Fei-Yun Wu","doi":"10.1177/02841851241291928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) is a semi-quantitative tool for evaluating the extent and distribution of early ischemic changes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the value of ASPECTS on non-contrast CT (NCCT), arterial-phase CT (APCT), or venous-phase CT (VPCT) in predicting the final infarct core (IC) on follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the clinical outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In total, 120 patients with AIS who underwent EVT in our center were retrospectively enrolled. Correlations between CT-ASPECTS and follow-up DWI-ASPECTS were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Mean differences and limit of agreement (LoA) between CT-ASPECTS and follow-up DWI-ASPECTS were assessed using the Bland-Altman plots. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to identify independent factors and evaluate their performances in predicting the clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VPCT-ASPECTS exhibited the highest correlation with follow-up DWI-ASPECTS (r = 0.846, <i>P </i>< 0.001), followed by APCT-ASPECTS (r = 0.613, <i>P </i>< 0.001) and NCCT-ASPECTS (r = 0.557, <i>P </i>< 0.001). The mean difference between VPCT-ASPECTS and follow-up DWI-ASPECTS was 0.0 (limit of agreement = -2.1 to 2.1). National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at admission (NIHSS<sub>pre</sub>) (odds ratio [OR]=1.162, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.063-1.270; <i>P </i>= 0.001) and VPCT-ASPECTS (OR=0.728, 95% CI=0.535-0.991; <i>P </i>= 0.044) were the independent factors associated with clinical outcomes. The combined model integrating NIHSS<sub>pre</sub> and VPCT-ASPECTS exhibited an excellent performance in predicting good clinical outcomes (area under curve [AUC]=0.807; sensitivity=75.0%; specificity=72.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VPCT-ASPECTS may be a promising imaging biomarker to predict the final IC and the clinical outcome of the patients with AIS after EVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851241291928"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting final infarct size and clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke after endovascular thrombectomy using the Alberta Stroke Program early CT score on venous-phase CT.\",\"authors\":\"Zi-Xin Yin, Guang-Chen Shen, Wen-Jing Ni, Shan-Shan Lu, Sheng Liu, Hai-Bin Shi, Xiao-Quan Xu, Fei-Yun Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02841851241291928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) is a semi-quantitative tool for evaluating the extent and distribution of early ischemic changes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the value of ASPECTS on non-contrast CT (NCCT), arterial-phase CT (APCT), or venous-phase CT (VPCT) in predicting the final infarct core (IC) on follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the clinical outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In total, 120 patients with AIS who underwent EVT in our center were retrospectively enrolled. Correlations between CT-ASPECTS and follow-up DWI-ASPECTS were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Mean differences and limit of agreement (LoA) between CT-ASPECTS and follow-up DWI-ASPECTS were assessed using the Bland-Altman plots. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to identify independent factors and evaluate their performances in predicting the clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VPCT-ASPECTS exhibited the highest correlation with follow-up DWI-ASPECTS (r = 0.846, <i>P </i>< 0.001), followed by APCT-ASPECTS (r = 0.613, <i>P </i>< 0.001) and NCCT-ASPECTS (r = 0.557, <i>P </i>< 0.001). The mean difference between VPCT-ASPECTS and follow-up DWI-ASPECTS was 0.0 (limit of agreement = -2.1 to 2.1). National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at admission (NIHSS<sub>pre</sub>) (odds ratio [OR]=1.162, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.063-1.270; <i>P </i>= 0.001) and VPCT-ASPECTS (OR=0.728, 95% CI=0.535-0.991; <i>P </i>= 0.044) were the independent factors associated with clinical outcomes. The combined model integrating NIHSS<sub>pre</sub> and VPCT-ASPECTS exhibited an excellent performance in predicting good clinical outcomes (area under curve [AUC]=0.807; sensitivity=75.0%; specificity=72.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VPCT-ASPECTS may be a promising imaging biomarker to predict the final IC and the clinical outcome of the patients with AIS after EVT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2841851241291928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241291928\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241291928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍阿尔伯塔省卒中项目早期计算机断层扫描评分(ASPECTS)是一种半定量工具,用于评估早期缺血性病变的程度和分布。目的:评估非对比CT(NCCT)、动脉期CT(APCT)或静脉期CT(VPCT)上的ASPECTS在预测后续弥散加权成像(DWI)的最终梗死核心(IC)以及血管内血栓切除术(EVT)后急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者临床预后方面的价值:材料和方法:本中心共回顾性纳入了120例接受EVT治疗的AIS患者。采用斯皮尔曼秩相关系数分析 CT-ASPECTS 与随访 DWI-ASPECTS 之间的相关性。使用Bland-Altman图评估CT-ASPECTS和随访DWI-ASPECTS之间的平均差和一致性极限(LoA)。使用多变量逻辑回归和接收者操作特征曲线分析来确定独立因素,并评估它们在预测临床结果方面的性能:VPCT-ASPECTS与随访DWI-ASPECTS的相关性最高(r=0.846,P P pre)(几率比[OR]=1.162,95%置信区间[CI]=1.063-1.270;P=0.001),VPCT-ASPECTS(OR=0.728,95% CI=0.535-0.991;P=0.044)是与临床结果相关的独立因素。综合 NIHSSpre 和 VPCT-ASPECTS 的组合模型在预测良好临床预后方面表现出色(曲线下面积 [AUC]=0.807; 灵敏度=75.0%; 特异性=72.3%):结论:VPCT-ASPECTS可能是预测EVT后AIS患者最终IC和临床预后的一种有前途的成像生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting final infarct size and clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke after endovascular thrombectomy using the Alberta Stroke Program early CT score on venous-phase CT.

Background: The Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) is a semi-quantitative tool for evaluating the extent and distribution of early ischemic changes.

Purpose: To assess the value of ASPECTS on non-contrast CT (NCCT), arterial-phase CT (APCT), or venous-phase CT (VPCT) in predicting the final infarct core (IC) on follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the clinical outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

Material and methods: In total, 120 patients with AIS who underwent EVT in our center were retrospectively enrolled. Correlations between CT-ASPECTS and follow-up DWI-ASPECTS were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Mean differences and limit of agreement (LoA) between CT-ASPECTS and follow-up DWI-ASPECTS were assessed using the Bland-Altman plots. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to identify independent factors and evaluate their performances in predicting the clinical outcomes.

Results: VPCT-ASPECTS exhibited the highest correlation with follow-up DWI-ASPECTS (r = 0.846, P < 0.001), followed by APCT-ASPECTS (r = 0.613, P < 0.001) and NCCT-ASPECTS (r = 0.557, P < 0.001). The mean difference between VPCT-ASPECTS and follow-up DWI-ASPECTS was 0.0 (limit of agreement = -2.1 to 2.1). National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at admission (NIHSSpre) (odds ratio [OR]=1.162, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.063-1.270; P = 0.001) and VPCT-ASPECTS (OR=0.728, 95% CI=0.535-0.991; P = 0.044) were the independent factors associated with clinical outcomes. The combined model integrating NIHSSpre and VPCT-ASPECTS exhibited an excellent performance in predicting good clinical outcomes (area under curve [AUC]=0.807; sensitivity=75.0%; specificity=72.3%).

Conclusion: VPCT-ASPECTS may be a promising imaging biomarker to predict the final IC and the clinical outcome of the patients with AIS after EVT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信