全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染延长使用抗生素一年的益处和不良事件:前瞻性队列分析

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Richard Chao, Scott D Rothenberger, Andrew J Frear, Brian R Hamlin, Brian A Klatt, Neel B Shah, Kenneth L Urish
{"title":"全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染延长使用抗生素一年的益处和不良事件:前瞻性队列分析","authors":"Richard Chao, Scott D Rothenberger, Andrew J Frear, Brian R Hamlin, Brian A Klatt, Neel B Shah, Kenneth L Urish","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are common and serious complications following knee and hip arthroplasty. Our previous retrospective study suggested extended antibiotics following debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) decreased failure rates and were not associated with increased adverse events (AEs) as compared to a standard 6 weeks of antibiotic therapy. Further, extended antibiotics beyond one year did not provide additional benefits. These observations were tested in this prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of patients who underwent DAIR for total knee arthroplasty PJI and received primary antibiotics were compared to patients who received primary antibiotics combined with extended antibiotics for one year. Participants had a minimum of 2-year follow-up after the final dose of antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A prospective cohort of 79 patients was followed, where 39 participants (52.7%) received primary antibiotics and 35 participants (47.3%) received both primary and extended antibiotics following DAIR. Multivariable time-to-event analyses revealed that extended antibiotic use was an independent predictor of treatment success. Infection-free survival differed significantly between the two treatment regimens, as the hazard of PJI failure was significantly lower for extended antibiotics as compared to primary antibiotics alone (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.46 [0.24 to 0.87], P = 0.017). The AE rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with primary antibiotics only versus primary combined with extended antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This prospective cohort study supports our previous observations that extended antibiotics for one year were associated with lower failure rates as compared to primary antibiotics alone. Extended antibiotics after primary antibiotics were not found to be associated with increased AEs as compared to only primary antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits and Adverse Events Associated With Extended Antibiotic Use for One Year Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Chao, Scott D Rothenberger, Andrew J Frear, Brian R Hamlin, Brian A Klatt, Neel B Shah, Kenneth L Urish\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are common and serious complications following knee and hip arthroplasty. Our previous retrospective study suggested extended antibiotics following debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) decreased failure rates and were not associated with increased adverse events (AEs) as compared to a standard 6 weeks of antibiotic therapy. Further, extended antibiotics beyond one year did not provide additional benefits. These observations were tested in this prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of patients who underwent DAIR for total knee arthroplasty PJI and received primary antibiotics were compared to patients who received primary antibiotics combined with extended antibiotics for one year. Participants had a minimum of 2-year follow-up after the final dose of antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A prospective cohort of 79 patients was followed, where 39 participants (52.7%) received primary antibiotics and 35 participants (47.3%) received both primary and extended antibiotics following DAIR. Multivariable time-to-event analyses revealed that extended antibiotic use was an independent predictor of treatment success. Infection-free survival differed significantly between the two treatment regimens, as the hazard of PJI failure was significantly lower for extended antibiotics as compared to primary antibiotics alone (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.46 [0.24 to 0.87], P = 0.017). The AE rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with primary antibiotics only versus primary combined with extended antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This prospective cohort study supports our previous observations that extended antibiotics for one year were associated with lower failure rates as compared to primary antibiotics alone. Extended antibiotics after primary antibiotics were not found to be associated with increased AEs as compared to only primary antibiotics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.061\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:假体周围关节感染(PJI)是膝关节和髋关节置换术后常见的严重并发症。我们之前的回顾性研究表明,与标准的 6 周抗生素治疗相比,清创、抗生素和植入物保留(DAIR)后延长抗生素治疗可降低失败率,且与不良事件(AEs)的增加无关。此外,延长抗生素治疗一年以上也不会带来更多益处。本前瞻性队列研究对这些观察结果进行了检验:一项前瞻性队列研究比较了接受 DAIR 治疗的全膝关节置换术 PJI 患者与接受初级抗生素治疗并延长抗生素治疗一年的患者。结果:对79名患者进行了前瞻性队列随访,其中39名患者(52.7%)在DAIR后接受了初级抗生素治疗,35名患者(47.3%)在DAIR后同时接受了初级抗生素和扩展抗生素治疗。多变量时间到事件分析显示,延长抗生素使用时间是治疗成功的独立预测因素。两种治疗方案的无感染存活率差异显著,因为与单纯使用主要抗生素相比,使用扩展抗生素的 PJI 失败风险显著降低(调整后危险比 [HR] = 0.46 [0.24 至 0.87],P = 0.017)。仅使用主要抗生素与使用主要抗生素和扩展抗生素的患者之间的AE发生率没有明显差异:这项前瞻性队列研究证实了我们之前的观察结果,即与单纯使用初级抗生素相比,延长抗生素治疗一年的失败率较低。与仅使用初级抗生素相比,在使用初级抗生素后延长抗生素疗程并不会导致AEs增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefits and Adverse Events Associated With Extended Antibiotic Use for One Year Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Analysis.

Background: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are common and serious complications following knee and hip arthroplasty. Our previous retrospective study suggested extended antibiotics following debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) decreased failure rates and were not associated with increased adverse events (AEs) as compared to a standard 6 weeks of antibiotic therapy. Further, extended antibiotics beyond one year did not provide additional benefits. These observations were tested in this prospective cohort study.

Methods: A prospective cohort of patients who underwent DAIR for total knee arthroplasty PJI and received primary antibiotics were compared to patients who received primary antibiotics combined with extended antibiotics for one year. Participants had a minimum of 2-year follow-up after the final dose of antibiotics.

Results: A prospective cohort of 79 patients was followed, where 39 participants (52.7%) received primary antibiotics and 35 participants (47.3%) received both primary and extended antibiotics following DAIR. Multivariable time-to-event analyses revealed that extended antibiotic use was an independent predictor of treatment success. Infection-free survival differed significantly between the two treatment regimens, as the hazard of PJI failure was significantly lower for extended antibiotics as compared to primary antibiotics alone (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.46 [0.24 to 0.87], P = 0.017). The AE rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with primary antibiotics only versus primary combined with extended antibiotics.

Conclusions: This prospective cohort study supports our previous observations that extended antibiotics for one year were associated with lower failure rates as compared to primary antibiotics alone. Extended antibiotics after primary antibiotics were not found to be associated with increased AEs as compared to only primary antibiotics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信