关于德国、奥地利和瑞士烧伤中心重症监护中严重热创伤的目标温度和热管理的调查。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Burns Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2024.107308
Stefan Trojan , Friedemann Stein , Rolf Lefering , Thorsten Annecke , Frank Wappler , Ulrich Limper
{"title":"关于德国、奥地利和瑞士烧伤中心重症监护中严重热创伤的目标温度和热管理的调查。","authors":"Stefan Trojan ,&nbsp;Friedemann Stein ,&nbsp;Rolf Lefering ,&nbsp;Thorsten Annecke ,&nbsp;Frank Wappler ,&nbsp;Ulrich Limper","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2024.107308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Burn trauma induces hypermetabolism and alters thermoregulation resulting in elevated body temperature. Because patients with burns are prone to heat loss and hypothermia, maintaining physiologic body temperature is important. However, optimal target temperature is widely unknown because thermoregulation of burn trauma has mainly been studied in the previous century, when treatment concepts differed from current era. The aim of this study was to investigate current thermal management of burn treatment and to investigate the discrepancies between classical concepts of thermoregulation in burn trauma and current practice of temperature management. A paper-based survey was conducted in burn centres in Germany, Austria, and German-speaking Switzerland. Participants were asked for expected temperatures, temperature goals, and thermal management of severely burned patients. Results were evaluated for adults and children. 37 of 38 approached burn centres participated in this survey. 59 % expected that adults with burn trauma would develop hyperthermia (&gt;37.5 °C) but only 27 % expected hyperthermia in children (&gt;38 °C). The average target body temperature was 37.1 °C for adults and 36.9 °C for children. Adults below 35.7 °C and children below 36.0 °C were assessed to be hypothermic. Temperatures above 38.8 °C in adults and 38.7 °C in children raised suspicion for sepsis. Antipyretic treatment was assumed to be justified at temperatures above 39.1 °C in adults and 38.5 °C in children. Although the most common warming method was to increase ambient temperature, 89 % of all participants felt their wellbeing was affected by an increased ambient temperature and 68 % were concerned about temperature-related negative effects. Although 57 % of the responding centres had established a standard operating procedure for thermal management, only 41 % considered the available literature to be very relevant in daily practice and 89 % criticized the lack of guidelines. Limit and target temperatures in European burn centres are heterogeneous. Classic concepts of thermal management in burn care are not universally adopted. A majority of the centers expresses the need for specific guidelines. The basis for this should be multicentre clinical trials on temperature management in burn trauma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"51 1","pages":"Article 107308"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey about target temperature and thermal management in intensive care for severe thermal trauma in burn centres of Germany, Austria and Switzerland\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Trojan ,&nbsp;Friedemann Stein ,&nbsp;Rolf Lefering ,&nbsp;Thorsten Annecke ,&nbsp;Frank Wappler ,&nbsp;Ulrich Limper\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burns.2024.107308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Burn trauma induces hypermetabolism and alters thermoregulation resulting in elevated body temperature. Because patients with burns are prone to heat loss and hypothermia, maintaining physiologic body temperature is important. However, optimal target temperature is widely unknown because thermoregulation of burn trauma has mainly been studied in the previous century, when treatment concepts differed from current era. The aim of this study was to investigate current thermal management of burn treatment and to investigate the discrepancies between classical concepts of thermoregulation in burn trauma and current practice of temperature management. A paper-based survey was conducted in burn centres in Germany, Austria, and German-speaking Switzerland. Participants were asked for expected temperatures, temperature goals, and thermal management of severely burned patients. Results were evaluated for adults and children. 37 of 38 approached burn centres participated in this survey. 59 % expected that adults with burn trauma would develop hyperthermia (&gt;37.5 °C) but only 27 % expected hyperthermia in children (&gt;38 °C). The average target body temperature was 37.1 °C for adults and 36.9 °C for children. Adults below 35.7 °C and children below 36.0 °C were assessed to be hypothermic. Temperatures above 38.8 °C in adults and 38.7 °C in children raised suspicion for sepsis. Antipyretic treatment was assumed to be justified at temperatures above 39.1 °C in adults and 38.5 °C in children. Although the most common warming method was to increase ambient temperature, 89 % of all participants felt their wellbeing was affected by an increased ambient temperature and 68 % were concerned about temperature-related negative effects. Although 57 % of the responding centres had established a standard operating procedure for thermal management, only 41 % considered the available literature to be very relevant in daily practice and 89 % criticized the lack of guidelines. Limit and target temperatures in European burn centres are heterogeneous. Classic concepts of thermal management in burn care are not universally adopted. A majority of the centers expresses the need for specific guidelines. The basis for this should be multicentre clinical trials on temperature management in burn trauma.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 107308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417924003486\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417924003486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

烧伤创伤会诱发高代谢并改变体温调节,从而导致体温升高。由于烧伤患者容易失热和体温过低,因此维持生理体温非常重要。然而,由于烧伤创面的体温调节主要是在上个世纪进行研究的,当时的治疗理念与现在不同,因此最佳目标体温普遍不为人知。本研究旨在调查当前烧伤治疗的体温管理,并研究烧伤创面体温调节的经典概念与当前体温管理实践之间的差异。我们在德国、奥地利和瑞士德语区的烧伤中心进行了一项纸质调查。调查询问了严重烧伤患者的预期体温、体温目标和体温管理。调查结果针对成人和儿童进行了评估。38 家受访烧伤中心中有 37 家参与了此次调查。59% 的人认为成人烧伤患者会出现高热(>37.5 °C),但只有 27% 的人认为儿童患者会出现高热(>38 °C)。成人的平均目标体温为 37.1 °C,儿童为 36.9 °C。成人低于 35.7 °C,儿童低于 36.0 °C,则被评估为体温过低。成人体温超过 38.8 °C,儿童体温超过 38.7 °C,则需要怀疑败血症。如果成人体温超过 39.1 ℃,儿童体温超过 38.5 ℃,则有理由进行退热治疗。虽然最常见的加温方法是提高环境温度,但 89% 的参与者认为环境温度升高会影响他们的健康,68% 的参与者担心与温度有关的负面影响。虽然 57% 的受访中心已制定了热管理标准操作程序,但只有 41% 的受访者认为现有文献与日常实践非常相关,89% 的受访者批评缺乏指导方针。欧洲烧伤中心的极限温度和目标温度各不相同。烧伤护理中的热管理经典概念并未被普遍采用。大多数中心都表示需要制定具体的指南。烧伤创面温度管理的多中心临床试验应该是制定指导方针的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survey about target temperature and thermal management in intensive care for severe thermal trauma in burn centres of Germany, Austria and Switzerland
Burn trauma induces hypermetabolism and alters thermoregulation resulting in elevated body temperature. Because patients with burns are prone to heat loss and hypothermia, maintaining physiologic body temperature is important. However, optimal target temperature is widely unknown because thermoregulation of burn trauma has mainly been studied in the previous century, when treatment concepts differed from current era. The aim of this study was to investigate current thermal management of burn treatment and to investigate the discrepancies between classical concepts of thermoregulation in burn trauma and current practice of temperature management. A paper-based survey was conducted in burn centres in Germany, Austria, and German-speaking Switzerland. Participants were asked for expected temperatures, temperature goals, and thermal management of severely burned patients. Results were evaluated for adults and children. 37 of 38 approached burn centres participated in this survey. 59 % expected that adults with burn trauma would develop hyperthermia (>37.5 °C) but only 27 % expected hyperthermia in children (>38 °C). The average target body temperature was 37.1 °C for adults and 36.9 °C for children. Adults below 35.7 °C and children below 36.0 °C were assessed to be hypothermic. Temperatures above 38.8 °C in adults and 38.7 °C in children raised suspicion for sepsis. Antipyretic treatment was assumed to be justified at temperatures above 39.1 °C in adults and 38.5 °C in children. Although the most common warming method was to increase ambient temperature, 89 % of all participants felt their wellbeing was affected by an increased ambient temperature and 68 % were concerned about temperature-related negative effects. Although 57 % of the responding centres had established a standard operating procedure for thermal management, only 41 % considered the available literature to be very relevant in daily practice and 89 % criticized the lack of guidelines. Limit and target temperatures in European burn centres are heterogeneous. Classic concepts of thermal management in burn care are not universally adopted. A majority of the centers expresses the need for specific guidelines. The basis for this should be multicentre clinical trials on temperature management in burn trauma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Burns
Burns 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
304
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice. Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信