基于网络的肺部远程康复:系统综述。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Manuel Ayala-Chauvin, Fernando A Chicaiza, Patricia Acosta-Vargas, Janio Jadan, Verónica Maldonado-Garcés, Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Gloria Acosta-Vargas, Mayra Carrión-Toro, Marco Santórum, Mario Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Camila Madera, Wilmer Esparza
{"title":"基于网络的肺部远程康复:系统综述。","authors":"Manuel Ayala-Chauvin, Fernando A Chicaiza, Patricia Acosta-Vargas, Janio Jadan, Verónica Maldonado-Garcés, Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Gloria Acosta-Vargas, Mayra Carrión-Toro, Marco Santórum, Mario Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Camila Madera, Wilmer Esparza","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00396-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation (WBPTR) can serve as a valuable tool when access to conventional care is limited. This review assesses a series of studies that explore pulmonary telerehabilitation programmes delivered via web-based platforms. The studies involved participants with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Of the 3190 participants, 1697 engaged in WBPTR platforms, while the remaining 1493 comprised the control groups. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation led to an increase in daily step count (MD 446.66, 95% CI 96.47 to 796.86), though this did not meet the minimum clinically important difference. Additionally, WBPTR did not yield significant improvements in the six-minute walking test (MD 5.01, 95% CI - 5.19 to 15.21), health-related quality of life as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (MD - 0.15, 95% CI - 2.24 to 1.95), or the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD 0.17, 95% CI - 0.13 to 0.46). Moreover, there was no significant improvement in dyspnoea-related health status, as assessed by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD - 0.01, 95% CI - 0.29 to 0.27) or the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (MD - 0.14, 95% CI - 0.43 to 0.14). Based on these findings, this review concludes that WBPTR does not offer substantial advantages over traditional care. While slight improvements in exercise performance were observed, no meaningful enhancements were noted in dyspnoea or quality of life metrics. Overall, WBPTR remains a complementary and accessible option for managing and monitoring COPD patients. However, further research and innovation are required to improve its efficacy and adapt it to various clinical environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Web-based pulmonary telehabilitation: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Ayala-Chauvin, Fernando A Chicaiza, Patricia Acosta-Vargas, Janio Jadan, Verónica Maldonado-Garcés, Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Gloria Acosta-Vargas, Mayra Carrión-Toro, Marco Santórum, Mario Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Camila Madera, Wilmer Esparza\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41533-024-00396-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation (WBPTR) can serve as a valuable tool when access to conventional care is limited. This review assesses a series of studies that explore pulmonary telerehabilitation programmes delivered via web-based platforms. The studies involved participants with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Of the 3190 participants, 1697 engaged in WBPTR platforms, while the remaining 1493 comprised the control groups. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation led to an increase in daily step count (MD 446.66, 95% CI 96.47 to 796.86), though this did not meet the minimum clinically important difference. Additionally, WBPTR did not yield significant improvements in the six-minute walking test (MD 5.01, 95% CI - 5.19 to 15.21), health-related quality of life as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (MD - 0.15, 95% CI - 2.24 to 1.95), or the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD 0.17, 95% CI - 0.13 to 0.46). Moreover, there was no significant improvement in dyspnoea-related health status, as assessed by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD - 0.01, 95% CI - 0.29 to 0.27) or the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (MD - 0.14, 95% CI - 0.43 to 0.14). Based on these findings, this review concludes that WBPTR does not offer substantial advantages over traditional care. While slight improvements in exercise performance were observed, no meaningful enhancements were noted in dyspnoea or quality of life metrics. Overall, WBPTR remains a complementary and accessible option for managing and monitoring COPD patients. However, further research and innovation are required to improve its efficacy and adapt it to various clinical environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569176/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00396-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00396-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于网络的肺部远程康复(WBPTR)可以在传统治疗手段有限的情况下作为一种有价值的工具。本综述评估了一系列探讨通过网络平台提供肺远程康复项目的研究。这些研究涉及患有中度至重度慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的参与者。在 3190 名参与者中,有 1697 人参与了 WBPTR 平台,其余 1493 人组成对照组。16项研究被纳入荟萃分析。基于网络的肺远程康复可增加每日步数(MD 446.66,95% CI 96.47 至 796.86),但未达到最小临床重要性差异。此外,WBPTR 在六分钟步行测试(MD 5.01,95% CI - 5.19 至 15.21)、圣乔治呼吸问卷(MD - 0.15,95% CI - 2.24 至 1.95)或慢性呼吸系统疾病问卷(MD 0.17,95% CI - 0.13 至 0.46)等健康相关生活质量方面均无显著改善。此外,通过慢性呼吸系统疾病问卷(MD - 0.01,95% CI - 0.29 至 0.27)或改良的医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表(MD - 0.14,95% CI - 0.43 至 0.14)评估,呼吸困难相关的健康状况没有明显改善。基于这些研究结果,本综述得出结论,WBPTR 与传统护理相比并无实质性优势。虽然运动表现略有改善,但在呼吸困难或生活质量指标方面没有发现有意义的改善。总体而言,WBPTR 仍是管理和监测慢性阻塞性肺病患者的一种补充性、可及性选择。不过,还需要进一步研究和创新,以提高其疗效并使其适应各种临床环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Web-based pulmonary telehabilitation: a systematic review.

Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation (WBPTR) can serve as a valuable tool when access to conventional care is limited. This review assesses a series of studies that explore pulmonary telerehabilitation programmes delivered via web-based platforms. The studies involved participants with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Of the 3190 participants, 1697 engaged in WBPTR platforms, while the remaining 1493 comprised the control groups. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation led to an increase in daily step count (MD 446.66, 95% CI 96.47 to 796.86), though this did not meet the minimum clinically important difference. Additionally, WBPTR did not yield significant improvements in the six-minute walking test (MD 5.01, 95% CI - 5.19 to 15.21), health-related quality of life as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (MD - 0.15, 95% CI - 2.24 to 1.95), or the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD 0.17, 95% CI - 0.13 to 0.46). Moreover, there was no significant improvement in dyspnoea-related health status, as assessed by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD - 0.01, 95% CI - 0.29 to 0.27) or the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (MD - 0.14, 95% CI - 0.43 to 0.14). Based on these findings, this review concludes that WBPTR does not offer substantial advantages over traditional care. While slight improvements in exercise performance were observed, no meaningful enhancements were noted in dyspnoea or quality of life metrics. Overall, WBPTR remains a complementary and accessible option for managing and monitoring COPD patients. However, further research and innovation are required to improve its efficacy and adapt it to various clinical environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信