定性研究美国和以色列成年人对 IQOS 广告信息的看法:修改后的暴露和风险声明、美国 FDA 认可和健康警告。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Carla J Berg, Hagai Levine, Cassidy R LoParco, Yuxian Cui, Amal Khayat, Zongshuan Duan, Lorien C Abroms, Yan Wang, Yael Bar-Zeev
{"title":"定性研究美国和以色列成年人对 IQOS 广告信息的看法:修改后的暴露和风险声明、美国 FDA 认可和健康警告。","authors":"Carla J Berg, Hagai Levine, Cassidy R LoParco, Yuxian Cui, Amal Khayat, Zongshuan Duan, Lorien C Abroms, Yan Wang, Yael Bar-Zeev","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>IQOS, a leading heated tobacco product, is advertised as less harmful than cigarettes and received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorization for 'reduced exposure' advertising claims. Perceptions of advertising messages, including reduced exposure/risk claims, FDA endorsements, and health warning labels (HWLs), are understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews (N=84) from US and Israeli adults (2022) examined perceptions of advertising messages, specifically: 1) scientific claims that switching completely from cigarettes to IQOS reduces 1a) chemical exposure and 1b) tobacco-related disease risk; 2) FDA endorsement of IQOS as a 2a) better choice for adult smokers and 2b) fundamentally different product (heat-not-burn); and 3) promoting IQOS as cigarette alternatives with a HWL pertaining to cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For half of participants, referencing scientific studies or the FDA enhanced credibility; some believed this implied unbiased, rigorous research. Half were skeptical due to lack of research-related details. Half interpreted message 1 (switching) to mean any substitution could be beneficial; half interpreted it as complete substitution was necessary. Most did not perceive differences between message 1a (reduced exposure) vs. 1b (reduced risk). Some believed message 2a (FDA endorsement, not targeting youth) demonstrated IQOS' social responsibility. Some interpreted message 2b (fundamentally different product) as risk reduction; others perceived no difference. The majority paraphrased messages using the terms 'safer', 'healthier', or 'less harmful'. For message 3 (safer alternative), some did not think the HWL applied to IQOS; some believed it promoted IQOS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regulators and researchers must monitor harm reduction advertising messaging and take actions to prevent consumer misinterpretations.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Philip Morris International's IQOS received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorization for 'reduced exposure' advertising claims, which are often misinterpreted, and has exploited FDA authorization to promote IQOS globally. This qualitative study showed that most participants perceived no difference between reduced risk vs. exposure messages in IQOS ads, half believed that references to scientific studies or FDA enhanced credibility, some believed certain messages demonstrated IQOS' social responsibility, and some perceived warnings in IQOS ads to promote IQOS. Product ads using harm reduction messages must be monitored to inform efforts to prevent potentially harmful misinterpretations and mitigate negative population-level impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative examination of US and Israeli adults' perceptions of IQOS advertising messages: modified exposure and risk statements, US FDA endorsement, and health warnings.\",\"authors\":\"Carla J Berg, Hagai Levine, Cassidy R LoParco, Yuxian Cui, Amal Khayat, Zongshuan Duan, Lorien C Abroms, Yan Wang, Yael Bar-Zeev\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>IQOS, a leading heated tobacco product, is advertised as less harmful than cigarettes and received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorization for 'reduced exposure' advertising claims. Perceptions of advertising messages, including reduced exposure/risk claims, FDA endorsements, and health warning labels (HWLs), are understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews (N=84) from US and Israeli adults (2022) examined perceptions of advertising messages, specifically: 1) scientific claims that switching completely from cigarettes to IQOS reduces 1a) chemical exposure and 1b) tobacco-related disease risk; 2) FDA endorsement of IQOS as a 2a) better choice for adult smokers and 2b) fundamentally different product (heat-not-burn); and 3) promoting IQOS as cigarette alternatives with a HWL pertaining to cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For half of participants, referencing scientific studies or the FDA enhanced credibility; some believed this implied unbiased, rigorous research. Half were skeptical due to lack of research-related details. Half interpreted message 1 (switching) to mean any substitution could be beneficial; half interpreted it as complete substitution was necessary. Most did not perceive differences between message 1a (reduced exposure) vs. 1b (reduced risk). Some believed message 2a (FDA endorsement, not targeting youth) demonstrated IQOS' social responsibility. Some interpreted message 2b (fundamentally different product) as risk reduction; others perceived no difference. The majority paraphrased messages using the terms 'safer', 'healthier', or 'less harmful'. For message 3 (safer alternative), some did not think the HWL applied to IQOS; some believed it promoted IQOS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regulators and researchers must monitor harm reduction advertising messaging and take actions to prevent consumer misinterpretations.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Philip Morris International's IQOS received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorization for 'reduced exposure' advertising claims, which are often misinterpreted, and has exploited FDA authorization to promote IQOS globally. This qualitative study showed that most participants perceived no difference between reduced risk vs. exposure messages in IQOS ads, half believed that references to scientific studies or FDA enhanced credibility, some believed certain messages demonstrated IQOS' social responsibility, and some perceived warnings in IQOS ads to promote IQOS. Product ads using harm reduction messages must be monitored to inform efforts to prevent potentially harmful misinterpretations and mitigate negative population-level impacts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae266\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:IQOS是一种领先的加热烟草产品,其广告宣传比香烟危害更小,并获得了美国食品药品管理局(FDA)对 "减少暴露 "广告声称的授权。对广告信息(包括减少暴露/风险声明、FDA认可和健康警示标签(HWL))的看法研究不足:方法:对美国和以色列成年人(2022 年)进行定性访谈(84 人),调查他们对广告信息的看法,特别是:1:1)从香烟完全转向 IQOS 可降低 1a) 化学暴露和 1b) 烟草相关疾病风险的科学说法;2)FDA 认可 IQOS 是 2a) 成人吸烟者的更好选择和 2b) 根本不同的产品(加热不燃烧);以及 3)将 IQOS 作为香烟替代品进行宣传,并使用与香烟相关的 HWL:对半数参与者而言,引用科学研究或美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的资料可提高可信度;一些人认为这意味着研究公正、严谨。由于缺乏与研究相关的细节,半数人持怀疑态度。半数人认为信息 1(转换)意味着任何替代品都是有益的;半数人认为完全替代是必要的。大多数人认为信息 1a(减少暴露)与信息 1b(减少风险)之间没有区别。一些人认为信息 2a(FDA 认可,不针对青少年)体现了 IQOS 的社会责任。一些人把信息 2b(产品根本不同)理解为降低风险;其他人则认为没有区别。大多数人都用 "更安全"、"更健康 "或 "危害更小 "来解释信息。对于信息 3(更安全的替代品),有些人认为 HWL 并不适用于 IQOS;有些人则认为它促进了 IQOS:监管机构和研究人员必须监督减害广告信息,并采取行动防止消费者误解:菲利普-莫里斯国际公司的IQOS获得了美国食品药品管理局(FDA)对 "减少暴露 "广告声称的授权,而这一声称经常被误解,该公司利用FDA的授权在全球范围内推广IQOS。这项定性研究表明,大多数参与者认为 IQOS 广告中的 "减少风险 "与 "减少暴露 "信息没有区别,一半人认为引用科学研究或 FDA 提高了可信度,一些人认为某些信息体现了 IQOS 的社会责任,还有一些人认为 IQOS 广告中的警告是为了宣传 IQOS。必须对使用减低危害信息的产品广告进行监测,以便为防止可能有害的误解和减轻对人群的负面影响提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualitative examination of US and Israeli adults' perceptions of IQOS advertising messages: modified exposure and risk statements, US FDA endorsement, and health warnings.

Introduction: IQOS, a leading heated tobacco product, is advertised as less harmful than cigarettes and received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorization for 'reduced exposure' advertising claims. Perceptions of advertising messages, including reduced exposure/risk claims, FDA endorsements, and health warning labels (HWLs), are understudied.

Methods: Qualitative interviews (N=84) from US and Israeli adults (2022) examined perceptions of advertising messages, specifically: 1) scientific claims that switching completely from cigarettes to IQOS reduces 1a) chemical exposure and 1b) tobacco-related disease risk; 2) FDA endorsement of IQOS as a 2a) better choice for adult smokers and 2b) fundamentally different product (heat-not-burn); and 3) promoting IQOS as cigarette alternatives with a HWL pertaining to cigarettes.

Results: For half of participants, referencing scientific studies or the FDA enhanced credibility; some believed this implied unbiased, rigorous research. Half were skeptical due to lack of research-related details. Half interpreted message 1 (switching) to mean any substitution could be beneficial; half interpreted it as complete substitution was necessary. Most did not perceive differences between message 1a (reduced exposure) vs. 1b (reduced risk). Some believed message 2a (FDA endorsement, not targeting youth) demonstrated IQOS' social responsibility. Some interpreted message 2b (fundamentally different product) as risk reduction; others perceived no difference. The majority paraphrased messages using the terms 'safer', 'healthier', or 'less harmful'. For message 3 (safer alternative), some did not think the HWL applied to IQOS; some believed it promoted IQOS.

Conclusion: Regulators and researchers must monitor harm reduction advertising messaging and take actions to prevent consumer misinterpretations.

Implications: Philip Morris International's IQOS received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorization for 'reduced exposure' advertising claims, which are often misinterpreted, and has exploited FDA authorization to promote IQOS globally. This qualitative study showed that most participants perceived no difference between reduced risk vs. exposure messages in IQOS ads, half believed that references to scientific studies or FDA enhanced credibility, some believed certain messages demonstrated IQOS' social responsibility, and some perceived warnings in IQOS ads to promote IQOS. Product ads using harm reduction messages must be monitored to inform efforts to prevent potentially harmful misinterpretations and mitigate negative population-level impacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信