反对禁用香烟过滤嘴,并认为去除过滤嘴会使香烟对吸烟成年人的危害更大:2022年国际烟草控制四国吸烟和吸食电子烟调查的结果。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shannon Gravely, Thomas E Novotny, K Michael Cummings, Katherine A East, Andrew Hyland, Pete Driezen, Janet Hoek, Kylie Morphett, David Sellars, Richard J O'Connor, Anne C K Quah, Geoffrey T Fong, Coral E Gartner
{"title":"反对禁用香烟过滤嘴,并认为去除过滤嘴会使香烟对吸烟成年人的危害更大:2022年国际烟草控制四国吸烟和吸食电子烟调查的结果。","authors":"Shannon Gravely, Thomas E Novotny, K Michael Cummings, Katherine A East, Andrew Hyland, Pete Driezen, Janet Hoek, Kylie Morphett, David Sellars, Richard J O'Connor, Anne C K Quah, Geoffrey T Fong, Coral E Gartner","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In line with historical tobacco industry marketing claims, many consumers perceive cigarettes with filters as less harmful than cigarette without filters. However, scientific evidence indicates that cigarette filters do not reduce the risks associated with smoking. We examined opposition to banning the sale of cigarettes with filters, beliefs about whether removing filters makes cigarettes much more harmful, and whether this belief is associated with opposition to banning filters among adults who smoke cigarettes from four high-income countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from 2,980 adults who smoke cigarettes and participated in the 2022 ITC Smoking and Vaping Survey in Australia, Canada, England, and the United States (US). Weighted descriptives estimated opposition to a cigarette filter ban and the belief that removing filters makes cigarettes 'much more', 'a little more', 'not more' harmful, or 'don't know'. Adjusted regression analyses examined the association between opposition to banning filters (vs. support/don't know) and the belief that removing filters would make cigarettes much more harmful (vs. otherwise).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all counties, 69.3% opposed banning filters, 11.5% of respondents supported banning filters, and 19.1% did not know (main effect for country differences: p=0.001). Country differences remained significant after adjusting for covariates (p=0.047), with adults who smoke in Australia and the US being significantly more likely to oppose a filter ban than those in England. Canada did not differ significantly from any of the countries. Nearly half (45.9%) believe that removing filters would make cigarettes much more harmful, 28.6% reported a little more harmful, 15.3% were unsure, and 10.2% reported not more harmful (country differences: p=0.002). Country differences were no longer significant after adjustment (p=0.18). Believing that removing filters makes cigarettes much more harmful was strongly associated with opposing a filter ban (78.5%) (vs. otherwise: 62.1%, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across all four countries, three-quarters of adults who smoke erroneously believe that removing filters would make cigarettes more harmful, and believing that doing so would make cigarettes much more harmful was the strongest predictor of opposing a filter ban.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>More than 90% of manufactured cigarettes worldwide contain filters. Contrary to marketing claims by the tobacco industry, cigarette filters do not offer any health protection from cigarette smoke; however, three-quarters of adults who smoke erroneously believe that cigarettes with filters are much less harmful than cigarettes without filters. To protect public health and the environment, the World Health Organization has recommended that policymakers consider banning cigarette filters as they are unnecessary single use plastics.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opposition to banning cigarette filters and the belief that removing filters makes cigarettes much more harmful among adults who smoke: Findings from the 2022 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Shannon Gravely, Thomas E Novotny, K Michael Cummings, Katherine A East, Andrew Hyland, Pete Driezen, Janet Hoek, Kylie Morphett, David Sellars, Richard J O'Connor, Anne C K Quah, Geoffrey T Fong, Coral E Gartner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In line with historical tobacco industry marketing claims, many consumers perceive cigarettes with filters as less harmful than cigarette without filters. However, scientific evidence indicates that cigarette filters do not reduce the risks associated with smoking. We examined opposition to banning the sale of cigarettes with filters, beliefs about whether removing filters makes cigarettes much more harmful, and whether this belief is associated with opposition to banning filters among adults who smoke cigarettes from four high-income countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from 2,980 adults who smoke cigarettes and participated in the 2022 ITC Smoking and Vaping Survey in Australia, Canada, England, and the United States (US). Weighted descriptives estimated opposition to a cigarette filter ban and the belief that removing filters makes cigarettes 'much more', 'a little more', 'not more' harmful, or 'don't know'. Adjusted regression analyses examined the association between opposition to banning filters (vs. support/don't know) and the belief that removing filters would make cigarettes much more harmful (vs. otherwise).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all counties, 69.3% opposed banning filters, 11.5% of respondents supported banning filters, and 19.1% did not know (main effect for country differences: p=0.001). Country differences remained significant after adjusting for covariates (p=0.047), with adults who smoke in Australia and the US being significantly more likely to oppose a filter ban than those in England. Canada did not differ significantly from any of the countries. Nearly half (45.9%) believe that removing filters would make cigarettes much more harmful, 28.6% reported a little more harmful, 15.3% were unsure, and 10.2% reported not more harmful (country differences: p=0.002). Country differences were no longer significant after adjustment (p=0.18). Believing that removing filters makes cigarettes much more harmful was strongly associated with opposing a filter ban (78.5%) (vs. otherwise: 62.1%, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across all four countries, three-quarters of adults who smoke erroneously believe that removing filters would make cigarettes more harmful, and believing that doing so would make cigarettes much more harmful was the strongest predictor of opposing a filter ban.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>More than 90% of manufactured cigarettes worldwide contain filters. Contrary to marketing claims by the tobacco industry, cigarette filters do not offer any health protection from cigarette smoke; however, three-quarters of adults who smoke erroneously believe that cigarettes with filters are much less harmful than cigarettes without filters. To protect public health and the environment, the World Health Organization has recommended that policymakers consider banning cigarette filters as they are unnecessary single use plastics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae270\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:根据烟草行业历来的营销主张,许多消费者认为带过滤嘴的香烟比不带过滤嘴的香烟危害小。然而,科学证据表明,香烟过滤嘴并不能降低吸烟的相关风险。我们研究了来自四个高收入国家的成年吸烟者中反对禁止销售带过滤嘴卷烟的情况、对去掉过滤嘴是否会使卷烟危害更大的看法,以及这种看法是否与反对禁止销售过滤嘴卷烟有关:数据来自澳大利亚、加拿大、英国和美国的2,980名吸烟成年人,他们参加了2022年ITC吸烟和吸食电子烟调查。加权描述估计了对禁止香烟过滤嘴的反对意见,以及认为去除过滤嘴会使香烟 "更有害"、"更有害一点"、"不更有害 "或 "不知道"。调整后的回归分析考察了反对禁止过滤嘴(与支持/不知道)和认为去除过滤嘴会使香烟危害更大(与其他)之间的关联:在所有国家中,69.3% 的受访者反对禁止使用过滤嘴,11.5% 的受访者支持禁止使用过滤嘴,19.1% 的受访者不知道(国家差异的主效应:P=0.001)。在对协变量进行调整后,国家差异仍然明显(p=0.047),澳大利亚和美国的吸烟成年人反对禁止过滤嘴的比例明显高于英国。加拿大与其他国家没有明显差异。近一半(45.9%)的人认为取消过滤嘴会使香烟的危害增加很多,28.6%的人认为危害增加一点,15.3%的人不确定,10.2%的人认为危害不会增加(国家差异:p=0.002)。经调整后,国家差异不再显著(p=0.18)。认为去除过滤嘴会使香烟危害更大与反对禁止过滤嘴(78.5%)密切相关(与之相比:62.1%,p结论:在所有四个国家中,四分之三的吸烟成年人错误地认为去除过滤嘴会使香烟的危害更大,而认为去除过滤嘴会使香烟的危害更大是反对过滤嘴禁令的最大预测因素:全球 90% 以上的卷烟都含有过滤嘴。然而,四分之三的成年吸烟者错误地认为,有过滤嘴的香烟比没有过滤嘴的香烟危害要小得多。为了保护公众健康和环境,世界卫生组织建议政策制定者考虑禁止香烟过滤嘴,因为它们是不必要的一次性塑料制品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opposition to banning cigarette filters and the belief that removing filters makes cigarettes much more harmful among adults who smoke: Findings from the 2022 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.

Introduction: In line with historical tobacco industry marketing claims, many consumers perceive cigarettes with filters as less harmful than cigarette without filters. However, scientific evidence indicates that cigarette filters do not reduce the risks associated with smoking. We examined opposition to banning the sale of cigarettes with filters, beliefs about whether removing filters makes cigarettes much more harmful, and whether this belief is associated with opposition to banning filters among adults who smoke cigarettes from four high-income countries.

Methods: Data are from 2,980 adults who smoke cigarettes and participated in the 2022 ITC Smoking and Vaping Survey in Australia, Canada, England, and the United States (US). Weighted descriptives estimated opposition to a cigarette filter ban and the belief that removing filters makes cigarettes 'much more', 'a little more', 'not more' harmful, or 'don't know'. Adjusted regression analyses examined the association between opposition to banning filters (vs. support/don't know) and the belief that removing filters would make cigarettes much more harmful (vs. otherwise).

Results: Across all counties, 69.3% opposed banning filters, 11.5% of respondents supported banning filters, and 19.1% did not know (main effect for country differences: p=0.001). Country differences remained significant after adjusting for covariates (p=0.047), with adults who smoke in Australia and the US being significantly more likely to oppose a filter ban than those in England. Canada did not differ significantly from any of the countries. Nearly half (45.9%) believe that removing filters would make cigarettes much more harmful, 28.6% reported a little more harmful, 15.3% were unsure, and 10.2% reported not more harmful (country differences: p=0.002). Country differences were no longer significant after adjustment (p=0.18). Believing that removing filters makes cigarettes much more harmful was strongly associated with opposing a filter ban (78.5%) (vs. otherwise: 62.1%, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Across all four countries, three-quarters of adults who smoke erroneously believe that removing filters would make cigarettes more harmful, and believing that doing so would make cigarettes much more harmful was the strongest predictor of opposing a filter ban.

Implications: More than 90% of manufactured cigarettes worldwide contain filters. Contrary to marketing claims by the tobacco industry, cigarette filters do not offer any health protection from cigarette smoke; however, three-quarters of adults who smoke erroneously believe that cigarettes with filters are much less harmful than cigarettes without filters. To protect public health and the environment, the World Health Organization has recommended that policymakers consider banning cigarette filters as they are unnecessary single use plastics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信