Daniel L Hall, Gloria Y Yeh, Conall O'Cleirigh, Lynne I Wagner, Jeffrey Peppercorn, John Denninger, April M Hirschberg, Hang Lee, Michaela Markwart, Emma Siefring, Helen R Mizrach, Raissa Li, Zainab Mian, Erika Tsuchiyose, Angela Wen, Andrea J Bullock, Elyse R Park
{"title":"IN FOCUS:针对癌症复发恐惧的身心复原力干预试点随机对照试验。","authors":"Daniel L Hall, Gloria Y Yeh, Conall O'Cleirigh, Lynne I Wagner, Jeffrey Peppercorn, John Denninger, April M Hirschberg, Hang Lee, Michaela Markwart, Emma Siefring, Helen R Mizrach, Raissa Li, Zainab Mian, Erika Tsuchiyose, Angela Wen, Andrea J Bullock, Elyse R Park","doi":"10.1002/pon.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is prevalent and distressing among survivors of cancer. Evidence-based mind-body and cognitive-behavioral skills lack integration and testing in scalable formats.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT04876599) tested a synchronous, virtual mind-body group resiliency intervention for FCR (IN FOCUS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Adults with elevated FCR (FCR Inventory severity ≥ 16; 16-21 = elevated, 22-36 = clinically elevated) after completing primary treatment for non-metastatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to eight weekly sessions of IN FOCUS or usual care (UC; synchronous, virtual community group support referral). Feasibility metrics included ≥ 70% retention per arm (primary outcome), ≥ 75% attendance in ≥ 6 sessions, ≥ 75% adherence to relaxation skills practice ≥ 3 days per week and by delivery fidelity (% content covered in video-recorded sessions). Acceptability was assessed quantitatively via ratings of enjoyableness, convenience, helpfulness, odds of future use, and satisfaction (benchmark ≥ 80% of ratings ≥ 4 on 1-5 Likert scale) and qualitatively via individual exit interviews. Linear mixed models explicated slopes in FCR (secondary) and resiliency (exploratory; Current Experiences Scale) from baseline to 2 months (primary endpoint) and 5 months using intention-to-treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From July 2021 to March 2022, 64 survivors enrolled (25-73 years old, M = 7 years since diagnosis). IN FOCUS was feasible and acceptable (91% retention; attendance median = 7 sessions, 97% relaxation practice adherence, 95% content fully covered; 82% of acceptability ratings ≥ 4). Interviews (n = 59) revealed benefits in both arms. By 2 months, compared to UC, IN FOCUS reduced FCR to a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = -2.4; 95% CI = -4.2, -0.7; d = 0.66). By 5 months, FCR effects had attenuated (Mdiff = -0.16, 95% CI -1.97, 1.65; d = -0.04), although levels of resiliency had increased with a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = 10.0; 95% CI = 4.9, 15.1; d = 0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For survivors of non-metastatic cancer, a synchronous, virtual mind-body resiliency program for FCR is feasible, acceptable, and seemingly beneficial compared to a community group referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"33 11","pages":"e70026"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of IN FOCUS: A Mind-Body Resiliency Intervention for Fear of Cancer Recurrence.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel L Hall, Gloria Y Yeh, Conall O'Cleirigh, Lynne I Wagner, Jeffrey Peppercorn, John Denninger, April M Hirschberg, Hang Lee, Michaela Markwart, Emma Siefring, Helen R Mizrach, Raissa Li, Zainab Mian, Erika Tsuchiyose, Angela Wen, Andrea J Bullock, Elyse R Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is prevalent and distressing among survivors of cancer. Evidence-based mind-body and cognitive-behavioral skills lack integration and testing in scalable formats.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT04876599) tested a synchronous, virtual mind-body group resiliency intervention for FCR (IN FOCUS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Adults with elevated FCR (FCR Inventory severity ≥ 16; 16-21 = elevated, 22-36 = clinically elevated) after completing primary treatment for non-metastatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to eight weekly sessions of IN FOCUS or usual care (UC; synchronous, virtual community group support referral). Feasibility metrics included ≥ 70% retention per arm (primary outcome), ≥ 75% attendance in ≥ 6 sessions, ≥ 75% adherence to relaxation skills practice ≥ 3 days per week and by delivery fidelity (% content covered in video-recorded sessions). Acceptability was assessed quantitatively via ratings of enjoyableness, convenience, helpfulness, odds of future use, and satisfaction (benchmark ≥ 80% of ratings ≥ 4 on 1-5 Likert scale) and qualitatively via individual exit interviews. Linear mixed models explicated slopes in FCR (secondary) and resiliency (exploratory; Current Experiences Scale) from baseline to 2 months (primary endpoint) and 5 months using intention-to-treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From July 2021 to March 2022, 64 survivors enrolled (25-73 years old, M = 7 years since diagnosis). IN FOCUS was feasible and acceptable (91% retention; attendance median = 7 sessions, 97% relaxation practice adherence, 95% content fully covered; 82% of acceptability ratings ≥ 4). Interviews (n = 59) revealed benefits in both arms. By 2 months, compared to UC, IN FOCUS reduced FCR to a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = -2.4; 95% CI = -4.2, -0.7; d = 0.66). By 5 months, FCR effects had attenuated (Mdiff = -0.16, 95% CI -1.97, 1.65; d = -0.04), although levels of resiliency had increased with a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = 10.0; 95% CI = 4.9, 15.1; d = 0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For survivors of non-metastatic cancer, a synchronous, virtual mind-body resiliency program for FCR is feasible, acceptable, and seemingly beneficial compared to a community group referral.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"volume\":\"33 11\",\"pages\":\"e70026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of IN FOCUS: A Mind-Body Resiliency Intervention for Fear of Cancer Recurrence.
Introduction: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is prevalent and distressing among survivors of cancer. Evidence-based mind-body and cognitive-behavioral skills lack integration and testing in scalable formats.
Objective: This pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT04876599) tested a synchronous, virtual mind-body group resiliency intervention for FCR (IN FOCUS).
Method: Adults with elevated FCR (FCR Inventory severity ≥ 16; 16-21 = elevated, 22-36 = clinically elevated) after completing primary treatment for non-metastatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to eight weekly sessions of IN FOCUS or usual care (UC; synchronous, virtual community group support referral). Feasibility metrics included ≥ 70% retention per arm (primary outcome), ≥ 75% attendance in ≥ 6 sessions, ≥ 75% adherence to relaxation skills practice ≥ 3 days per week and by delivery fidelity (% content covered in video-recorded sessions). Acceptability was assessed quantitatively via ratings of enjoyableness, convenience, helpfulness, odds of future use, and satisfaction (benchmark ≥ 80% of ratings ≥ 4 on 1-5 Likert scale) and qualitatively via individual exit interviews. Linear mixed models explicated slopes in FCR (secondary) and resiliency (exploratory; Current Experiences Scale) from baseline to 2 months (primary endpoint) and 5 months using intention-to-treat.
Results: From July 2021 to March 2022, 64 survivors enrolled (25-73 years old, M = 7 years since diagnosis). IN FOCUS was feasible and acceptable (91% retention; attendance median = 7 sessions, 97% relaxation practice adherence, 95% content fully covered; 82% of acceptability ratings ≥ 4). Interviews (n = 59) revealed benefits in both arms. By 2 months, compared to UC, IN FOCUS reduced FCR to a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = -2.4; 95% CI = -4.2, -0.7; d = 0.66). By 5 months, FCR effects had attenuated (Mdiff = -0.16, 95% CI -1.97, 1.65; d = -0.04), although levels of resiliency had increased with a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = 10.0; 95% CI = 4.9, 15.1; d = 0.78).
Conclusions: For survivors of non-metastatic cancer, a synchronous, virtual mind-body resiliency program for FCR is feasible, acceptable, and seemingly beneficial compared to a community group referral.
期刊介绍:
Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology.
This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues.
Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.