IN FOCUS:针对癌症复发恐惧的身心复原力干预试点随机对照试验。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Daniel L Hall, Gloria Y Yeh, Conall O'Cleirigh, Lynne I Wagner, Jeffrey Peppercorn, John Denninger, April M Hirschberg, Hang Lee, Michaela Markwart, Emma Siefring, Helen R Mizrach, Raissa Li, Zainab Mian, Erika Tsuchiyose, Angela Wen, Andrea J Bullock, Elyse R Park
{"title":"IN FOCUS:针对癌症复发恐惧的身心复原力干预试点随机对照试验。","authors":"Daniel L Hall, Gloria Y Yeh, Conall O'Cleirigh, Lynne I Wagner, Jeffrey Peppercorn, John Denninger, April M Hirschberg, Hang Lee, Michaela Markwart, Emma Siefring, Helen R Mizrach, Raissa Li, Zainab Mian, Erika Tsuchiyose, Angela Wen, Andrea J Bullock, Elyse R Park","doi":"10.1002/pon.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is prevalent and distressing among survivors of cancer. Evidence-based mind-body and cognitive-behavioral skills lack integration and testing in scalable formats.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT04876599) tested a synchronous, virtual mind-body group resiliency intervention for FCR (IN FOCUS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Adults with elevated FCR (FCR Inventory severity ≥ 16; 16-21 = elevated, 22-36 = clinically elevated) after completing primary treatment for non-metastatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to eight weekly sessions of IN FOCUS or usual care (UC; synchronous, virtual community group support referral). Feasibility metrics included ≥ 70% retention per arm (primary outcome), ≥ 75% attendance in ≥ 6 sessions, ≥ 75% adherence to relaxation skills practice ≥ 3 days per week and by delivery fidelity (% content covered in video-recorded sessions). Acceptability was assessed quantitatively via ratings of enjoyableness, convenience, helpfulness, odds of future use, and satisfaction (benchmark ≥ 80% of ratings ≥ 4 on 1-5 Likert scale) and qualitatively via individual exit interviews. Linear mixed models explicated slopes in FCR (secondary) and resiliency (exploratory; Current Experiences Scale) from baseline to 2 months (primary endpoint) and 5 months using intention-to-treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From July 2021 to March 2022, 64 survivors enrolled (25-73 years old, M = 7 years since diagnosis). IN FOCUS was feasible and acceptable (91% retention; attendance median = 7 sessions, 97% relaxation practice adherence, 95% content fully covered; 82% of acceptability ratings ≥ 4). Interviews (n = 59) revealed benefits in both arms. By 2 months, compared to UC, IN FOCUS reduced FCR to a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = -2.4; 95% CI = -4.2, -0.7; d = 0.66). By 5 months, FCR effects had attenuated (Mdiff = -0.16, 95% CI -1.97, 1.65; d = -0.04), although levels of resiliency had increased with a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = 10.0; 95% CI = 4.9, 15.1; d = 0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For survivors of non-metastatic cancer, a synchronous, virtual mind-body resiliency program for FCR is feasible, acceptable, and seemingly beneficial compared to a community group referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"33 11","pages":"e70026"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of IN FOCUS: A Mind-Body Resiliency Intervention for Fear of Cancer Recurrence.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel L Hall, Gloria Y Yeh, Conall O'Cleirigh, Lynne I Wagner, Jeffrey Peppercorn, John Denninger, April M Hirschberg, Hang Lee, Michaela Markwart, Emma Siefring, Helen R Mizrach, Raissa Li, Zainab Mian, Erika Tsuchiyose, Angela Wen, Andrea J Bullock, Elyse R Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is prevalent and distressing among survivors of cancer. Evidence-based mind-body and cognitive-behavioral skills lack integration and testing in scalable formats.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT04876599) tested a synchronous, virtual mind-body group resiliency intervention for FCR (IN FOCUS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Adults with elevated FCR (FCR Inventory severity ≥ 16; 16-21 = elevated, 22-36 = clinically elevated) after completing primary treatment for non-metastatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to eight weekly sessions of IN FOCUS or usual care (UC; synchronous, virtual community group support referral). Feasibility metrics included ≥ 70% retention per arm (primary outcome), ≥ 75% attendance in ≥ 6 sessions, ≥ 75% adherence to relaxation skills practice ≥ 3 days per week and by delivery fidelity (% content covered in video-recorded sessions). Acceptability was assessed quantitatively via ratings of enjoyableness, convenience, helpfulness, odds of future use, and satisfaction (benchmark ≥ 80% of ratings ≥ 4 on 1-5 Likert scale) and qualitatively via individual exit interviews. Linear mixed models explicated slopes in FCR (secondary) and resiliency (exploratory; Current Experiences Scale) from baseline to 2 months (primary endpoint) and 5 months using intention-to-treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From July 2021 to March 2022, 64 survivors enrolled (25-73 years old, M = 7 years since diagnosis). IN FOCUS was feasible and acceptable (91% retention; attendance median = 7 sessions, 97% relaxation practice adherence, 95% content fully covered; 82% of acceptability ratings ≥ 4). Interviews (n = 59) revealed benefits in both arms. By 2 months, compared to UC, IN FOCUS reduced FCR to a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = -2.4; 95% CI = -4.2, -0.7; d = 0.66). By 5 months, FCR effects had attenuated (Mdiff = -0.16, 95% CI -1.97, 1.65; d = -0.04), although levels of resiliency had increased with a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = 10.0; 95% CI = 4.9, 15.1; d = 0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For survivors of non-metastatic cancer, a synchronous, virtual mind-body resiliency program for FCR is feasible, acceptable, and seemingly beneficial compared to a community group referral.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"volume\":\"33 11\",\"pages\":\"e70026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介对癌症复发的恐惧(FCR)在癌症幸存者中十分普遍,而且令人苦恼。基于证据的身心和认知行为技能缺乏整合,也缺乏可扩展形式的测试:本随机对照试验(NCT04876599)测试了针对 FCR 的同步虚拟身心团体复原力干预(IN FOCUS):方法:将完成非转移性癌症初治后FCR升高(FCR量表严重度≥16;16-21=升高,22-36=临床升高)的成人随机分配(1:1)到每周八次的IN FOCUS或常规护理(UC;同步、虚拟社区小组支持转介)。可行性指标包括:每组的保留率≥ 70%(主要结果)、≥ 6 次课程的出席率≥ 75%、每周放松技能练习≥ 3 天的坚持率≥ 75%,以及授课忠实度(视频录像课程所涵盖内容的百分比)。可接受性通过对愉快度、方便性、有用性、未来使用几率和满意度的评分进行定量评估(基准≥80%的评分在1-5级李克特量表中≥4),并通过个人离职访谈进行定性评估。线性混合模型解释了从基线到 2 个月(主要终点)和 5 个月期间 FCR(次要)和复原力(探索性;当前体验量表)的斜率,采用意向治疗法:从 2021 年 7 月到 2022 年 3 月,64 名幸存者(25-73 岁,男性 = 诊断后 7 年)加入了 IN FOCUS。IN FOCUS 具有可行性和可接受性(91% 的保留率;参加次数中位数 = 7 次,97% 的放松练习坚持率,95% 的内容完全覆盖;82% 的可接受性评分≥ 4)。访谈(n = 59)显示,两组患者都从中受益。到 2 个月时,与 UC 相比,IN FOCUS 将 FCR 降低到中到大的效果(Mdiff = -2.4; 95% CI = -4.2, -0.7; d = 0.66)。到 5 个月时,FCR 的影响有所减弱(Mdiff = -0.16,95% CI -1.97, 1.65;d = -0.04),但复原力水平有所提高,达到中到大影响(Mdiff = 10.0;95% CI = 4.9, 15.1;d = 0.78):对于非转移性癌症的幸存者来说,针对 FCR 的同步虚拟身心复原计划是可行的、可接受的,而且与社区小组转介相比似乎更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of IN FOCUS: A Mind-Body Resiliency Intervention for Fear of Cancer Recurrence.

Introduction: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is prevalent and distressing among survivors of cancer. Evidence-based mind-body and cognitive-behavioral skills lack integration and testing in scalable formats.

Objective: This pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT04876599) tested a synchronous, virtual mind-body group resiliency intervention for FCR (IN FOCUS).

Method: Adults with elevated FCR (FCR Inventory severity ≥ 16; 16-21 = elevated, 22-36 = clinically elevated) after completing primary treatment for non-metastatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to eight weekly sessions of IN FOCUS or usual care (UC; synchronous, virtual community group support referral). Feasibility metrics included ≥ 70% retention per arm (primary outcome), ≥ 75% attendance in ≥ 6 sessions, ≥ 75% adherence to relaxation skills practice ≥ 3 days per week and by delivery fidelity (% content covered in video-recorded sessions). Acceptability was assessed quantitatively via ratings of enjoyableness, convenience, helpfulness, odds of future use, and satisfaction (benchmark ≥ 80% of ratings ≥ 4 on 1-5 Likert scale) and qualitatively via individual exit interviews. Linear mixed models explicated slopes in FCR (secondary) and resiliency (exploratory; Current Experiences Scale) from baseline to 2 months (primary endpoint) and 5 months using intention-to-treat.

Results: From July 2021 to March 2022, 64 survivors enrolled (25-73 years old, M = 7 years since diagnosis). IN FOCUS was feasible and acceptable (91% retention; attendance median = 7 sessions, 97% relaxation practice adherence, 95% content fully covered; 82% of acceptability ratings ≥ 4). Interviews (n = 59) revealed benefits in both arms. By 2 months, compared to UC, IN FOCUS reduced FCR to a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = -2.4; 95% CI = -4.2, -0.7; d = 0.66). By 5 months, FCR effects had attenuated (Mdiff = -0.16, 95% CI -1.97, 1.65; d = -0.04), although levels of resiliency had increased with a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = 10.0; 95% CI = 4.9, 15.1; d = 0.78).

Conclusions: For survivors of non-metastatic cancer, a synchronous, virtual mind-body resiliency program for FCR is feasible, acceptable, and seemingly beneficial compared to a community group referral.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信