母亲更喜欢混合产后护理模式:混合方法试点研究。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Aminath Shiwaza Moosa, Zhimin Poon, Lindy Ai Keng Koh, Dhana Letchimy Kagradaimdoo, Yaesol Park, Yuhan Yang, Suliha Bivi, Ding Xuan Ng, Eileen Koh Yi Ling, Ngiap Chuan Tan
{"title":"母亲更喜欢混合产后护理模式:混合方法试点研究。","authors":"Aminath Shiwaza Moosa, Zhimin Poon, Lindy Ai Keng Koh, Dhana Letchimy Kagradaimdoo, Yaesol Park, Yuhan Yang, Suliha Bivi, Ding Xuan Ng, Eileen Koh Yi Ling, Ngiap Chuan Tan","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06963-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth, including video consultation (VC), has become prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the experience and concern of women using VC for postpartum care has yet to be adequately studied but is crucial for their adoption. The study aimed to assess the experience and attitude of postpartum mothers (PPM) towards using VC as a novel model of care delivery and the factors that could potentially affect their adoption.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were gathered from PPM participating in VC using Zoom platform for postpartum care using mixed method. In-depth interviews (IDI) of twenty-five PPM were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and audited for accuracy. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes relating to perceived threat, usefulness, ease of use, and attitudes toward using VC in postpartum care. The themes are reported based on the \"Health Information Technology Acceptance Model\" framework. Preliminary quantitative data on the acceptability of VC were collected using structured surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPMs valued convenience, accessibility, and personalised care VC offered to address their immediate postpartum concerns. They perceived VC as suitable for seeking medical opinions, improving confidence in parent crafting, and providing better care access. They recognised the lack of physical examination as a major limitation in VC and proposed a hybrid postpartum care model, combining VC and in-person consultation to cater to individual needs and preferences. PPMs alluded to trust in the care providers, flexibility in VC appointment timings and enhanced interface of remote platforms as enablers for VC adoption. Preliminary quantitative data shows that PPMs found VC saved time (100%), energy (98%), and money (90%) and was appropriate (94%), easy to use (96%), acceptable (96%) for postpartum care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPMs favoured combining VC and in-person consultation to mitigate their concerns and personalise their care needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"757"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mothers prefer a hybrid model of postpartum care: a pilot mixed method study.\",\"authors\":\"Aminath Shiwaza Moosa, Zhimin Poon, Lindy Ai Keng Koh, Dhana Letchimy Kagradaimdoo, Yaesol Park, Yuhan Yang, Suliha Bivi, Ding Xuan Ng, Eileen Koh Yi Ling, Ngiap Chuan Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-024-06963-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth, including video consultation (VC), has become prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the experience and concern of women using VC for postpartum care has yet to be adequately studied but is crucial for their adoption. The study aimed to assess the experience and attitude of postpartum mothers (PPM) towards using VC as a novel model of care delivery and the factors that could potentially affect their adoption.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were gathered from PPM participating in VC using Zoom platform for postpartum care using mixed method. In-depth interviews (IDI) of twenty-five PPM were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and audited for accuracy. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes relating to perceived threat, usefulness, ease of use, and attitudes toward using VC in postpartum care. The themes are reported based on the \\\"Health Information Technology Acceptance Model\\\" framework. Preliminary quantitative data on the acceptability of VC were collected using structured surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPMs valued convenience, accessibility, and personalised care VC offered to address their immediate postpartum concerns. They perceived VC as suitable for seeking medical opinions, improving confidence in parent crafting, and providing better care access. They recognised the lack of physical examination as a major limitation in VC and proposed a hybrid postpartum care model, combining VC and in-person consultation to cater to individual needs and preferences. PPMs alluded to trust in the care providers, flexibility in VC appointment timings and enhanced interface of remote platforms as enablers for VC adoption. Preliminary quantitative data shows that PPMs found VC saved time (100%), energy (98%), and money (90%) and was appropriate (94%), easy to use (96%), acceptable (96%) for postpartum care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPMs favoured combining VC and in-person consultation to mitigate their concerns and personalise their care needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568520/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06963-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06963-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,包括视频会诊 (VC) 在内的远程保健已变得十分普遍。然而,妇女在产后护理中使用视频会诊的经验和担忧尚未得到充分研究,但这对其采用至关重要。本研究旨在评估产后母亲(PPM)对使用 VC 这种新型护理模式的经验和态度,以及可能影响其采用的因素:采用混合方法,从使用 Zoom 平台进行产后护理的产后母亲中收集数据。对 25 名 PPM 的深度访谈(IDI)进行了录音、逐字记录并审核其准确性。我们进行了主题分析,以确定与产后护理中使用 VC 的感知威胁、有用性、易用性和态度有关的主题。这些主题是根据 "健康信息技术接受模型 "框架进行报告的。通过结构化问卷调查收集了有关产妇对虚拟医疗系统接受度的初步定量数据:结果:产后妇女非常看重虚拟医疗所提供的便利性、可及性和个性化护理,以解决她们产后的燃眉之急。她们认为自愿咨询适用于寻求医疗意见、提高家长对护理工作的信心以及提供更好的护理服务。他们认识到缺乏身体检查是自愿咨询的一个主要局限,并提出了一种混合产后护理模式,将自愿咨询和面对面咨询结合起来,以满足个人的需求和偏好。产后护理人员指出,对护理提供者的信任、产后护理预约时间的灵活性以及远程平台界面的改进是采用产后护理的有利因素。初步的定量数据显示,PPMs 认为 VC 节省了时间(100%)、精力(98%)和金钱(90%),并且适合(94%)、易于使用(96%)和可接受(96%)产后护理:结论:产后妇女倾向于将自愿咨询与面对面咨询相结合,以减轻她们的担忧并满足她们个性化的护理需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mothers prefer a hybrid model of postpartum care: a pilot mixed method study.

Background: Telehealth, including video consultation (VC), has become prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the experience and concern of women using VC for postpartum care has yet to be adequately studied but is crucial for their adoption. The study aimed to assess the experience and attitude of postpartum mothers (PPM) towards using VC as a novel model of care delivery and the factors that could potentially affect their adoption.

Method: Data were gathered from PPM participating in VC using Zoom platform for postpartum care using mixed method. In-depth interviews (IDI) of twenty-five PPM were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and audited for accuracy. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes relating to perceived threat, usefulness, ease of use, and attitudes toward using VC in postpartum care. The themes are reported based on the "Health Information Technology Acceptance Model" framework. Preliminary quantitative data on the acceptability of VC were collected using structured surveys.

Results: PPMs valued convenience, accessibility, and personalised care VC offered to address their immediate postpartum concerns. They perceived VC as suitable for seeking medical opinions, improving confidence in parent crafting, and providing better care access. They recognised the lack of physical examination as a major limitation in VC and proposed a hybrid postpartum care model, combining VC and in-person consultation to cater to individual needs and preferences. PPMs alluded to trust in the care providers, flexibility in VC appointment timings and enhanced interface of remote platforms as enablers for VC adoption. Preliminary quantitative data shows that PPMs found VC saved time (100%), energy (98%), and money (90%) and was appropriate (94%), easy to use (96%), acceptable (96%) for postpartum care.

Conclusion: PPMs favoured combining VC and in-person consultation to mitigate their concerns and personalise their care needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信