C1 抑制剂,预防脑出血相关继发性脑损伤。

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Kevin Akeret, Bart R Thomson, Subhajit Ghosh, Marc Nolte, Urs Fischer, Rok Humar, Luca Regli, Dominik J Schaer, Michael Hugelshofer, Raphael M Buzzi
{"title":"C1 抑制剂,预防脑出血相关继发性脑损伤。","authors":"Kevin Akeret, Bart R Thomson, Subhajit Ghosh, Marc Nolte, Urs Fischer, Rok Humar, Luca Regli, Dominik J Schaer, Michael Hugelshofer, Raphael M Buzzi","doi":"10.1186/s12987-024-00594-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preclinical studies indicate that the systemic application of C1-inhibitor, clinically used to treat hereditary angioedema, reduces secondary brain injury after ischemic stroke. This study assessed the effect of C1-inhibitor on secondary brain injury after hemorrhagic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an established striatal whole-blood injection mouse model to mimic intracerebral hemorrhage-related secondary brain injury. Based on the spatiotemporal dynamics in our model, we calculated the necessary sample size (n = 24) and determined the most sensitive time point to detect potential group differences (48 h) prior to the experiments. The experimental setup, tissue processing and image analysis adhered to our published protocol. We randomized mice into three groups: C1-inhibitor treatment, placebo, and sham. Histology was standardized by taking eight anatomically predefined slices across the entire lesion. Lesion size, vascular leakage, and inflammatory responses were assessed using automated thresholding and dextran/ICAM1/CD45 intensity mapping. Investigators were blinded to group allocation during the experiment, tissue processing, and image analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Whole blood injection resulted in significantly larger lesion size and more pronounced vascular leakage and cellular inflammation compared to the sham group. However, there was no difference in lesion size or inflammatory markers between the C1-inhibitor and placebo groups. In addition, there was no difference in the inflammatory response of the choroid plexus, which has been identified as a central organ orchestrating inflammation after intracerebral hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The protective effect of C1-inhibitor might be isolated to pathophysiological processes with a predominant thromboinflammatory component, as in ischemia-reperfusion, but less so in permanent ischemia or intracerebral hemorrhage.</p>","PeriodicalId":12321,"journal":{"name":"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS","volume":"21 1","pages":"91"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"C1-inhibitor to prevent intracerebral hemorrhage-related secondary brain injury.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Akeret, Bart R Thomson, Subhajit Ghosh, Marc Nolte, Urs Fischer, Rok Humar, Luca Regli, Dominik J Schaer, Michael Hugelshofer, Raphael M Buzzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12987-024-00594-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preclinical studies indicate that the systemic application of C1-inhibitor, clinically used to treat hereditary angioedema, reduces secondary brain injury after ischemic stroke. This study assessed the effect of C1-inhibitor on secondary brain injury after hemorrhagic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an established striatal whole-blood injection mouse model to mimic intracerebral hemorrhage-related secondary brain injury. Based on the spatiotemporal dynamics in our model, we calculated the necessary sample size (n = 24) and determined the most sensitive time point to detect potential group differences (48 h) prior to the experiments. The experimental setup, tissue processing and image analysis adhered to our published protocol. We randomized mice into three groups: C1-inhibitor treatment, placebo, and sham. Histology was standardized by taking eight anatomically predefined slices across the entire lesion. Lesion size, vascular leakage, and inflammatory responses were assessed using automated thresholding and dextran/ICAM1/CD45 intensity mapping. Investigators were blinded to group allocation during the experiment, tissue processing, and image analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Whole blood injection resulted in significantly larger lesion size and more pronounced vascular leakage and cellular inflammation compared to the sham group. However, there was no difference in lesion size or inflammatory markers between the C1-inhibitor and placebo groups. In addition, there was no difference in the inflammatory response of the choroid plexus, which has been identified as a central organ orchestrating inflammation after intracerebral hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The protective effect of C1-inhibitor might be isolated to pathophysiological processes with a predominant thromboinflammatory component, as in ischemia-reperfusion, but less so in permanent ischemia or intracerebral hemorrhage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566463/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-024-00594-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-024-00594-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床前研究表明,全身应用C1-抑制剂(临床上用于治疗遗传性血管性水肿)可减轻缺血性脑卒中后的继发性脑损伤。本研究评估了 C1 抑制剂对出血性脑卒中后继发性脑损伤的影响:方法:我们使用已建立的纹状体全血注射小鼠模型模拟脑出血相关的继发性脑损伤。根据模型的时空动态,我们计算了必要的样本量(n = 24),并在实验前确定了检测潜在组间差异的最敏感时间点(48 h)。实验设置、组织处理和图像分析均按照我们公布的方案进行。我们将小鼠随机分为三组:C1抑制剂治疗组、安慰剂组和假治疗组。通过在整个病变部位拍摄八张解剖学上预定义的切片,对组织学进行标准化处理。使用自动阈值和葡聚糖/ICAM1/CD45强度图评估病变大小、血管渗漏和炎症反应。在实验、组织处理和图像分析过程中,研究人员对组别分配进行了盲法处理:结果:与假组相比,全血注射导致的病变明显更大,血管渗漏和细胞炎症更明显。然而,C1抑制剂组和安慰剂组的病灶大小和炎症指标没有差异。此外,脉络丛的炎症反应也没有差异,脉络丛已被确定为脑出血后协调炎症的中心器官:结论:C1-抑制剂的保护作用可能只适用于血栓性炎症占主导地位的病理生理过程,如缺血再灌注,但在永久性缺血或脑出血中作用较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
C1-inhibitor to prevent intracerebral hemorrhage-related secondary brain injury.

Background: Preclinical studies indicate that the systemic application of C1-inhibitor, clinically used to treat hereditary angioedema, reduces secondary brain injury after ischemic stroke. This study assessed the effect of C1-inhibitor on secondary brain injury after hemorrhagic stroke.

Methods: We used an established striatal whole-blood injection mouse model to mimic intracerebral hemorrhage-related secondary brain injury. Based on the spatiotemporal dynamics in our model, we calculated the necessary sample size (n = 24) and determined the most sensitive time point to detect potential group differences (48 h) prior to the experiments. The experimental setup, tissue processing and image analysis adhered to our published protocol. We randomized mice into three groups: C1-inhibitor treatment, placebo, and sham. Histology was standardized by taking eight anatomically predefined slices across the entire lesion. Lesion size, vascular leakage, and inflammatory responses were assessed using automated thresholding and dextran/ICAM1/CD45 intensity mapping. Investigators were blinded to group allocation during the experiment, tissue processing, and image analysis.

Results: Whole blood injection resulted in significantly larger lesion size and more pronounced vascular leakage and cellular inflammation compared to the sham group. However, there was no difference in lesion size or inflammatory markers between the C1-inhibitor and placebo groups. In addition, there was no difference in the inflammatory response of the choroid plexus, which has been identified as a central organ orchestrating inflammation after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Conclusion: The protective effect of C1-inhibitor might be isolated to pathophysiological processes with a predominant thromboinflammatory component, as in ischemia-reperfusion, but less so in permanent ischemia or intracerebral hemorrhage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS Neuroscience-Developmental Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: "Fluids and Barriers of the CNS" is a scholarly open access journal that specializes in the intricate world of the central nervous system's fluids and barriers, which are pivotal for the health and well-being of the human body. This journal is a peer-reviewed platform that welcomes research manuscripts exploring the full spectrum of CNS fluids and barriers, with a particular focus on their roles in both health and disease. At the heart of this journal's interest is the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), a vital fluid that circulates within the brain and spinal cord, playing a multifaceted role in the normal functioning of the brain and in various neurological conditions. The journal delves into the composition, circulation, and absorption of CSF, as well as its relationship with the parenchymal interstitial fluid and the neurovascular unit at the blood-brain barrier (BBB).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信