{"title":"隐藏的水对黄光素活化的影响","authors":"Zachary T Bachler, Michael F Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Structural biology relies on several powerful techniques, but these tend to be limited in their ability to characterize protein fluctuations and mobility. Overreliance on structural approaches can lead to omission of critical information regarding biological function. Currently there is a need for complementary biophysical methods to visualize these mobile aspects of protein function. Here, we review hydrostatic and osmotic pressure-based techniques to address this shortcoming for the paradigm of rhodopsin. Hydrostatic and osmotic pressure data contribute important examples, which are interpreted in terms of an energy landscape for hydration-mediated protein dynamics. We find that perturbations of rhodopsin conformational equilibria by force-based methods are not unrelated phenomena; rather they probe various hydration states involving functional proton reactions. Hydrostatic pressure acts on small numbers of strongly interacting structural or solvent-shell water molecules with relatively high energies, while osmotic pressure acts on large numbers of weakly interacting bulk-like water molecules with low energies. Local solvent fluctuations due to the hydration shell and collective water interactions affect hydrogen-bonded networks and domain motions that are explained by a hierarchical energy landscape model for protein dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":"4167-4179"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hidden water's influence on rhodopsin activation.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary T Bachler, Michael F Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Structural biology relies on several powerful techniques, but these tend to be limited in their ability to characterize protein fluctuations and mobility. Overreliance on structural approaches can lead to omission of critical information regarding biological function. Currently there is a need for complementary biophysical methods to visualize these mobile aspects of protein function. Here, we review hydrostatic and osmotic pressure-based techniques to address this shortcoming for the paradigm of rhodopsin. Hydrostatic and osmotic pressure data contribute important examples, which are interpreted in terms of an energy landscape for hydration-mediated protein dynamics. We find that perturbations of rhodopsin conformational equilibria by force-based methods are not unrelated phenomena; rather they probe various hydration states involving functional proton reactions. Hydrostatic pressure acts on small numbers of strongly interacting structural or solvent-shell water molecules with relatively high energies, while osmotic pressure acts on large numbers of weakly interacting bulk-like water molecules with low energies. Local solvent fluctuations due to the hydration shell and collective water interactions affect hydrogen-bonded networks and domain motions that are explained by a hierarchical energy landscape model for protein dynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4167-4179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Structural biology relies on several powerful techniques, but these tend to be limited in their ability to characterize protein fluctuations and mobility. Overreliance on structural approaches can lead to omission of critical information regarding biological function. Currently there is a need for complementary biophysical methods to visualize these mobile aspects of protein function. Here, we review hydrostatic and osmotic pressure-based techniques to address this shortcoming for the paradigm of rhodopsin. Hydrostatic and osmotic pressure data contribute important examples, which are interpreted in terms of an energy landscape for hydration-mediated protein dynamics. We find that perturbations of rhodopsin conformational equilibria by force-based methods are not unrelated phenomena; rather they probe various hydration states involving functional proton reactions. Hydrostatic pressure acts on small numbers of strongly interacting structural or solvent-shell water molecules with relatively high energies, while osmotic pressure acts on large numbers of weakly interacting bulk-like water molecules with low energies. Local solvent fluctuations due to the hydration shell and collective water interactions affect hydrogen-bonded networks and domain motions that are explained by a hierarchical energy landscape model for protein dynamics.
期刊介绍:
BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.