Dino Pedreschi , Luca Pappalardo , Emanuele Ferragina , Ricardo Baeza-Yates , Albert-László Barabási , Frank Dignum , Virginia Dignum , Tina Eliassi-Rad , Fosca Giannotti , János Kertész , Alistair Knott , Yannis Ioannidis , Paul Lukowicz , Andrea Passarella , Alex Sandy Pentland , John Shawe-Taylor , Alessandro Vespignani
{"title":"人类与人工智能的共同进化","authors":"Dino Pedreschi , Luca Pappalardo , Emanuele Ferragina , Ricardo Baeza-Yates , Albert-László Barabási , Frank Dignum , Virginia Dignum , Tina Eliassi-Rad , Fosca Giannotti , János Kertész , Alistair Knott , Yannis Ioannidis , Paul Lukowicz , Andrea Passarella , Alex Sandy Pentland , John Shawe-Taylor , Alessandro Vespignani","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human-AI coevolution, defined as a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other, increasingly characterises our society, but is understudied in artificial intelligence and complexity science literature. Recommender systems and assistants play a prominent role in human-AI coevolution, as they permeate many facets of daily life and influence human choices through online platforms. The interaction between users and AI results in a potentially endless feedback loop, wherein users' choices generate data to train AI models, which, in turn, shape subsequent user preferences. This human-AI feedback loop has peculiar characteristics compared to traditional human-machine interaction and gives rise to complex and often “unintended” systemic outcomes. This paper introduces human-AI coevolution as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science focused on the theoretical, empirical, and mathematical investigation of the human-AI feedback loop. In doing so, we: <em>(i)</em> outline the pros and cons of existing methodologies and highlight shortcomings and potential ways for capturing feedback loop mechanisms; <em>(ii)</em> propose a reflection at the intersection between complexity science, AI and society; <em>(iii)</em> provide real-world examples for different human-AI ecosystems; and <em>(iv)</em> illustrate challenges to the creation of such a field of study, conceptualising them at increasing levels of abstraction, i.e., scientific, legal and socio-political.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8434,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence","volume":"339 ","pages":"Article 104244"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human-AI coevolution\",\"authors\":\"Dino Pedreschi , Luca Pappalardo , Emanuele Ferragina , Ricardo Baeza-Yates , Albert-László Barabási , Frank Dignum , Virginia Dignum , Tina Eliassi-Rad , Fosca Giannotti , János Kertész , Alistair Knott , Yannis Ioannidis , Paul Lukowicz , Andrea Passarella , Alex Sandy Pentland , John Shawe-Taylor , Alessandro Vespignani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Human-AI coevolution, defined as a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other, increasingly characterises our society, but is understudied in artificial intelligence and complexity science literature. Recommender systems and assistants play a prominent role in human-AI coevolution, as they permeate many facets of daily life and influence human choices through online platforms. The interaction between users and AI results in a potentially endless feedback loop, wherein users' choices generate data to train AI models, which, in turn, shape subsequent user preferences. This human-AI feedback loop has peculiar characteristics compared to traditional human-machine interaction and gives rise to complex and often “unintended” systemic outcomes. This paper introduces human-AI coevolution as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science focused on the theoretical, empirical, and mathematical investigation of the human-AI feedback loop. In doing so, we: <em>(i)</em> outline the pros and cons of existing methodologies and highlight shortcomings and potential ways for capturing feedback loop mechanisms; <em>(ii)</em> propose a reflection at the intersection between complexity science, AI and society; <em>(iii)</em> provide real-world examples for different human-AI ecosystems; and <em>(iv)</em> illustrate challenges to the creation of such a field of study, conceptualising them at increasing levels of abstraction, i.e., scientific, legal and socio-political.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"339 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224001802\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224001802","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Human-AI coevolution, defined as a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other, increasingly characterises our society, but is understudied in artificial intelligence and complexity science literature. Recommender systems and assistants play a prominent role in human-AI coevolution, as they permeate many facets of daily life and influence human choices through online platforms. The interaction between users and AI results in a potentially endless feedback loop, wherein users' choices generate data to train AI models, which, in turn, shape subsequent user preferences. This human-AI feedback loop has peculiar characteristics compared to traditional human-machine interaction and gives rise to complex and often “unintended” systemic outcomes. This paper introduces human-AI coevolution as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science focused on the theoretical, empirical, and mathematical investigation of the human-AI feedback loop. In doing so, we: (i) outline the pros and cons of existing methodologies and highlight shortcomings and potential ways for capturing feedback loop mechanisms; (ii) propose a reflection at the intersection between complexity science, AI and society; (iii) provide real-world examples for different human-AI ecosystems; and (iv) illustrate challenges to the creation of such a field of study, conceptualising them at increasing levels of abstraction, i.e., scientific, legal and socio-political.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Artificial Intelligence (AIJ) welcomes papers covering a broad spectrum of AI topics, including cognition, automated reasoning, computer vision, machine learning, and more. Papers should demonstrate advancements in AI and propose innovative approaches to AI problems. Additionally, the journal accepts papers describing AI applications, focusing on how new methods enhance performance rather than reiterating conventional approaches. In addition to regular papers, AIJ also accepts Research Notes, Research Field Reviews, Position Papers, Book Reviews, and summary papers on AI challenges and competitions.