了解谷物产量监测技术的局限性,为农场研究提供依据

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Alysa Gauci, John Fulton, Scott Shearer, David J. Barker, Elizabeth Hawkins, Alexander J. Lindsey
{"title":"了解谷物产量监测技术的局限性,为农场研究提供依据","authors":"Alysa Gauci,&nbsp;John Fulton,&nbsp;Scott Shearer,&nbsp;David J. Barker,&nbsp;Elizabeth Hawkins,&nbsp;Alexander J. Lindsey","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Yield monitoring technology (YM) is a valuable tool to evaluate crop performance in on-farm research (OFR). However, limited information exists on utilizing this technology to accurately inform OFR. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of grain yield monitor mass flow sensors to detect changes in corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) yield for different plot lengths, provide a recommended minimum plot length to utilize YM in OFR, and determine if differences in estimating yield existed between YMs. Six treatment lengths that varied in distance of intentional yield differences (7.6, 15.2, 30.5, 61.0, 121.9, and 243.8 m) were created by alternating high-yield (202 kg N/ha application) and low-yield (0 kg N/ha application) plots. A total of four grain YMs with impact-style mass flow sensors were used within two commercially available combines. Yield comparisons were made between the plot combine and YMs to evaluate the accuracy of each technology for detecting the magnitude of yield change across lengths using analysis of variance and exponential regression curves. Results indicated that the mass flow sensors were not sensitive enough to detect quickly changing flow rates for alternating yield changes in small plot lengths. Minimum plot lengths ranged from 43 to 107 m depending on YM. Significant differences were observed between grain YMs from different manufacturers. Future work could evaluate the influence additional crops or smaller yield differences have on the optimum OFR plot length.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 6","pages":"3181-3190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21695","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the limitations of grain yield monitor technology to inform on-farm research\",\"authors\":\"Alysa Gauci,&nbsp;John Fulton,&nbsp;Scott Shearer,&nbsp;David J. Barker,&nbsp;Elizabeth Hawkins,&nbsp;Alexander J. Lindsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Yield monitoring technology (YM) is a valuable tool to evaluate crop performance in on-farm research (OFR). However, limited information exists on utilizing this technology to accurately inform OFR. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of grain yield monitor mass flow sensors to detect changes in corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) yield for different plot lengths, provide a recommended minimum plot length to utilize YM in OFR, and determine if differences in estimating yield existed between YMs. Six treatment lengths that varied in distance of intentional yield differences (7.6, 15.2, 30.5, 61.0, 121.9, and 243.8 m) were created by alternating high-yield (202 kg N/ha application) and low-yield (0 kg N/ha application) plots. A total of four grain YMs with impact-style mass flow sensors were used within two commercially available combines. Yield comparisons were made between the plot combine and YMs to evaluate the accuracy of each technology for detecting the magnitude of yield change across lengths using analysis of variance and exponential regression curves. Results indicated that the mass flow sensors were not sensitive enough to detect quickly changing flow rates for alternating yield changes in small plot lengths. Minimum plot lengths ranged from 43 to 107 m depending on YM. Significant differences were observed between grain YMs from different manufacturers. Future work could evaluate the influence additional crops or smaller yield differences have on the optimum OFR plot length.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"116 6\",\"pages\":\"3181-3190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21695\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21695\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21695","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

产量监测技术(YM)是评估农田研究(OFR)中作物表现的重要工具。然而,有关利用该技术为农田研究提供准确信息的资料却很有限。本研究的目的是评估谷物产量监测质量流量传感器检测不同地块长度的玉米(Zea mays L.)产量变化的能力,提供在农场研究中使用谷物产量监测技术的推荐最小地块长度,并确定不同谷物产量监测技术在估计产量方面是否存在差异。通过交替使用高产地块(每公顷施用 202 千克氮)和低产地块(每公顷施用 0 千克氮),创建了六种处理长度(7.6 米、15.2 米、30.5 米、61.0 米、121.9 米和 243.8 米),这些处理的有意产量差异距离各不相同。在两台市售联合收割机上共使用了四个装有冲击式质量流量传感器的谷物 YM。在小区联合收割机和 YM 之间进行了产量比较,以评估每种技术利用方差分析和指数回归曲线检测不同长度产量变化幅度的准确性。结果表明,质量流量传感器的灵敏度不够,无法检测到在小地块长度上产量交替变化的快速流量变化。根据不同的 YM,最小小区长度从 43 米到 107 米不等。不同制造商生产的谷物 YM 之间存在显著差异。未来的工作可以评估更多作物或更小的产量差异对最佳 OFR 小区长度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Understanding the limitations of grain yield monitor technology to inform on-farm research

Understanding the limitations of grain yield monitor technology to inform on-farm research

Yield monitoring technology (YM) is a valuable tool to evaluate crop performance in on-farm research (OFR). However, limited information exists on utilizing this technology to accurately inform OFR. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of grain yield monitor mass flow sensors to detect changes in corn (Zea mays L.) yield for different plot lengths, provide a recommended minimum plot length to utilize YM in OFR, and determine if differences in estimating yield existed between YMs. Six treatment lengths that varied in distance of intentional yield differences (7.6, 15.2, 30.5, 61.0, 121.9, and 243.8 m) were created by alternating high-yield (202 kg N/ha application) and low-yield (0 kg N/ha application) plots. A total of four grain YMs with impact-style mass flow sensors were used within two commercially available combines. Yield comparisons were made between the plot combine and YMs to evaluate the accuracy of each technology for detecting the magnitude of yield change across lengths using analysis of variance and exponential regression curves. Results indicated that the mass flow sensors were not sensitive enough to detect quickly changing flow rates for alternating yield changes in small plot lengths. Minimum plot lengths ranged from 43 to 107 m depending on YM. Significant differences were observed between grain YMs from different manufacturers. Future work could evaluate the influence additional crops or smaller yield differences have on the optimum OFR plot length.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信