美国东南部草地施用尿素肥料的空气吸水率和氨流失量

Miguel L. Cabrera, Dorcas Franklin, David Kissel
{"title":"美国东南部草地施用尿素肥料的空气吸水率和氨流失量","authors":"Miguel L. Cabrera,&nbsp;Dorcas Franklin,&nbsp;David Kissel","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Information on water absorption from the air by urea fertilizers and on NH<sub>3</sub> loss when applied to grasslands is limited. Urea application to grassland is typically broadcast (Bcast), whereas urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN) is applied either Bcast or in bands (dribble). This work was conducted to (1) evaluate water absorption from the air by Bcast granular urea, Bcast UAN, and dribble UAN under laboratory conditions, and (2) compare NH<sub>3</sub> losses from Bcast urea, Bcast UAN, and dribble UAN when applied to a grassland. Six field studies were conducted from 2017 to 2019. In the laboratory, Bcast UAN exposed to 100% relative humidity absorbed water from air at a faster rate than dribble UAN and Bcast urea. In the field, all three fertilizers lost similar amounts of NH<sub>3</sub> when applied to relatively wet soil (&gt; −0.1 MPa). In contrast, when the fertilizers were applied to dry soil (≤ −1.2 MPa), Bcast UAN lost the most NH<sub>3</sub> (17.3% and 19.8%) likely because of its capacity to absorb water from the air. Also, at −1.2 MPa, dribble UAN lost more NH<sub>3</sub> than Bcast urea (15.3 vs. 10.7%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), probably because the low osmotic potential of UAN (−55 MPa) allowed it to absorb water from the soil at a faster rate than urea could absorb water from the air. In contrast, when the soil water potential was −5.7 MPa, dribble UAN lost less NH<sub>3</sub> than Bcast urea (4.4 vs. 17.3%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), likely because the low soil water potential reduced its water absorption.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"88 6","pages":"2266-2276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20778","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Water absorption from air and ammonia loss from urea fertilizers applied to grassland in southeastern United States\",\"authors\":\"Miguel L. Cabrera,&nbsp;Dorcas Franklin,&nbsp;David Kissel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.20778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Information on water absorption from the air by urea fertilizers and on NH<sub>3</sub> loss when applied to grasslands is limited. Urea application to grassland is typically broadcast (Bcast), whereas urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN) is applied either Bcast or in bands (dribble). This work was conducted to (1) evaluate water absorption from the air by Bcast granular urea, Bcast UAN, and dribble UAN under laboratory conditions, and (2) compare NH<sub>3</sub> losses from Bcast urea, Bcast UAN, and dribble UAN when applied to a grassland. Six field studies were conducted from 2017 to 2019. In the laboratory, Bcast UAN exposed to 100% relative humidity absorbed water from air at a faster rate than dribble UAN and Bcast urea. In the field, all three fertilizers lost similar amounts of NH<sub>3</sub> when applied to relatively wet soil (&gt; −0.1 MPa). In contrast, when the fertilizers were applied to dry soil (≤ −1.2 MPa), Bcast UAN lost the most NH<sub>3</sub> (17.3% and 19.8%) likely because of its capacity to absorb water from the air. Also, at −1.2 MPa, dribble UAN lost more NH<sub>3</sub> than Bcast urea (15.3 vs. 10.7%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), probably because the low osmotic potential of UAN (−55 MPa) allowed it to absorb water from the soil at a faster rate than urea could absorb water from the air. In contrast, when the soil water potential was −5.7 MPa, dribble UAN lost less NH<sub>3</sub> than Bcast urea (4.4 vs. 17.3%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), likely because the low soil water potential reduced its water absorption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"volume\":\"88 6\",\"pages\":\"2266-2276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20778\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有关尿素肥料从空气中吸收水分以及施用到草地上的 NH3 损失的信息非常有限。在草地上施用尿素通常采用播撒(Bcast)方式,而硝酸尿素铵(UAN)则采用播撒或带状(滴灌)施用方式。这项工作的目的是:(1) 评估在实验室条件下播撒颗粒尿素、播撒尿素-硝酸铵和点播尿素-硝酸铵从空气中吸收水分的情况;(2) 比较在草地上施用播撒尿素、播撒尿素-硝酸铵和点播尿素-硝酸铵时的 NH3 损失情况。从 2017 年到 2019 年,共进行了六次实地研究。在实验室中,暴露在 100%相对湿度下的 Bcast UAN 从空气中吸收水分的速度快于 Dribble UAN 和 Bcast 尿素。在田间,当施用到相对潮湿的土壤(> -0.1兆帕)中时,这三种肥料损失的 NH3 量相似。相反,在干燥土壤(≤-1.2 兆帕)中施用这些肥料时,Bcast UAN 的 NH3 损失量最大(17.3% 和 19.8%),这可能是因为它具有从空气中吸收水分的能力。此外,在-1.2 兆帕时,滴灌尿素比加注尿素损失更多的 NH3(15.3% 对 10.7%,p <0.05),这可能是因为 UAN 的低渗透势(-55 兆帕)使其从土壤中吸收水分的速度快于尿素从空气中吸收水分的速度。相比之下,当土壤水势为 -5.7 MPa 时,滴灌尿素的 NH3 损失少于滴播尿素(4.4% vs. 17.3%,p < 0.05),这可能是因为土壤水势低降低了尿素的吸水性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Water absorption from air and ammonia loss from urea fertilizers applied to grassland in southeastern United States

Water absorption from air and ammonia loss from urea fertilizers applied to grassland in southeastern United States

Information on water absorption from the air by urea fertilizers and on NH3 loss when applied to grasslands is limited. Urea application to grassland is typically broadcast (Bcast), whereas urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN) is applied either Bcast or in bands (dribble). This work was conducted to (1) evaluate water absorption from the air by Bcast granular urea, Bcast UAN, and dribble UAN under laboratory conditions, and (2) compare NH3 losses from Bcast urea, Bcast UAN, and dribble UAN when applied to a grassland. Six field studies were conducted from 2017 to 2019. In the laboratory, Bcast UAN exposed to 100% relative humidity absorbed water from air at a faster rate than dribble UAN and Bcast urea. In the field, all three fertilizers lost similar amounts of NH3 when applied to relatively wet soil (> −0.1 MPa). In contrast, when the fertilizers were applied to dry soil (≤ −1.2 MPa), Bcast UAN lost the most NH3 (17.3% and 19.8%) likely because of its capacity to absorb water from the air. Also, at −1.2 MPa, dribble UAN lost more NH3 than Bcast urea (15.3 vs. 10.7%, p < 0.05), probably because the low osmotic potential of UAN (−55 MPa) allowed it to absorb water from the soil at a faster rate than urea could absorb water from the air. In contrast, when the soil water potential was −5.7 MPa, dribble UAN lost less NH3 than Bcast urea (4.4 vs. 17.3%, p < 0.05), likely because the low soil water potential reduced its water absorption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信