M. C. Nottingham, N. M. Curran, J. Pernet-Fisher, R. Burgess, I. A. Crawford, J. D. Gilmour, R. Tartèse, K. H. Joy
{"title":"阿波罗 16 号着陆点撞击历史的制约因素:类土壤角砾岩惰性气体记录的意义","authors":"M. C. Nottingham, N. M. Curran, J. Pernet-Fisher, R. Burgess, I. A. Crawford, J. D. Gilmour, R. Tartèse, K. H. Joy","doi":"10.1111/maps.14244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Apollo 16 regolith breccia sample suite provides a record of lunar regolith formation from the basin-forming epoch (~3.9 Ga) through to a time of declining impactor flux (~2 Ga). These rocks have been characterized into three groups: the “ancient,” “young,” and “soil-like” regolith breccias on the basis of their petrographic characteristics, and, in the case of the “ancient” and “young” regolith breccias, noble gas inventory. This study investigates the as-yet unexamined noble gas records of the “soil-like” regolith breccias to understand more recent regolith evolution processes that occurred at the Apollo 16 landing site. The range of gas concentrations measured for each noble gas in these samples is comparable to those previously reported for the local Apollo 16 soils. The “soil-like” regolith breccias were found to be more gas rich than the gas poor “young” and “ancient” regolith breccias, consistent with them having formed from comparatively mature soil(s). Our results further confirm the scientific value of lunar regolith breccias and bulk regolith samples as probes of the impact history and the space environment of the lunar surface across a wide range of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":18555,"journal":{"name":"Meteoritics & Planetary Science","volume":"59 11","pages":"2883-2921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/maps.14244","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constraints on the impact history of the Apollo 16 landing site: Implications of soil-like breccia noble gas records\",\"authors\":\"M. C. Nottingham, N. M. Curran, J. Pernet-Fisher, R. Burgess, I. A. Crawford, J. D. Gilmour, R. Tartèse, K. H. Joy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/maps.14244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Apollo 16 regolith breccia sample suite provides a record of lunar regolith formation from the basin-forming epoch (~3.9 Ga) through to a time of declining impactor flux (~2 Ga). These rocks have been characterized into three groups: the “ancient,” “young,” and “soil-like” regolith breccias on the basis of their petrographic characteristics, and, in the case of the “ancient” and “young” regolith breccias, noble gas inventory. This study investigates the as-yet unexamined noble gas records of the “soil-like” regolith breccias to understand more recent regolith evolution processes that occurred at the Apollo 16 landing site. The range of gas concentrations measured for each noble gas in these samples is comparable to those previously reported for the local Apollo 16 soils. The “soil-like” regolith breccias were found to be more gas rich than the gas poor “young” and “ancient” regolith breccias, consistent with them having formed from comparatively mature soil(s). Our results further confirm the scientific value of lunar regolith breccias and bulk regolith samples as probes of the impact history and the space environment of the lunar surface across a wide range of time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meteoritics & Planetary Science\",\"volume\":\"59 11\",\"pages\":\"2883-2921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/maps.14244\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meteoritics & Planetary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.14244\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteoritics & Planetary Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.14244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Constraints on the impact history of the Apollo 16 landing site: Implications of soil-like breccia noble gas records
The Apollo 16 regolith breccia sample suite provides a record of lunar regolith formation from the basin-forming epoch (~3.9 Ga) through to a time of declining impactor flux (~2 Ga). These rocks have been characterized into three groups: the “ancient,” “young,” and “soil-like” regolith breccias on the basis of their petrographic characteristics, and, in the case of the “ancient” and “young” regolith breccias, noble gas inventory. This study investigates the as-yet unexamined noble gas records of the “soil-like” regolith breccias to understand more recent regolith evolution processes that occurred at the Apollo 16 landing site. The range of gas concentrations measured for each noble gas in these samples is comparable to those previously reported for the local Apollo 16 soils. The “soil-like” regolith breccias were found to be more gas rich than the gas poor “young” and “ancient” regolith breccias, consistent with them having formed from comparatively mature soil(s). Our results further confirm the scientific value of lunar regolith breccias and bulk regolith samples as probes of the impact history and the space environment of the lunar surface across a wide range of time.
期刊介绍:
First issued in 1953, the journal publishes research articles describing the latest results of new studies, invited reviews of major topics in planetary science, editorials on issues of current interest in the field, and book reviews. The publications are original, not considered for publication elsewhere, and undergo peer-review. The topics include the origin and history of the solar system, planets and natural satellites, interplanetary dust and interstellar medium, lunar samples, meteors, and meteorites, asteroids, comets, craters, and tektites. Our authors and editors are professional scientists representing numerous disciplines, including astronomy, astrophysics, physics, geophysics, chemistry, isotope geochemistry, mineralogy, earth science, geology, and biology. MAPS has subscribers in over 40 countries. Fifty percent of MAPS'' readers are based outside the USA. The journal is available in hard copy and online.