小麦秸秆对煤炭生物甲烷化的协同影响:洞察微生物群落动力学,迈向非靶向代谢组学

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Sohail Khan, Ze Deng, Irfan Ali Phulpoto, Anam Jalil, Bobo Wang, Zhisheng Yu
{"title":"小麦秸秆对煤炭生物甲烷化的协同影响:洞察微生物群落动力学,迈向非靶向代谢组学","authors":"Sohail Khan,&nbsp;Ze Deng,&nbsp;Irfan Ali Phulpoto,&nbsp;Anam Jalil,&nbsp;Bobo Wang,&nbsp;Zhisheng Yu","doi":"10.1155/2024/4676624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Biogenic methane (BM) production from coal is quite limited due to its complex chemical nature, which makes the responsible microbes sensitive to its denaturation. In the current investigation, wheat straw (WS) at different concentrations as a cosubstrate were used with coal to augment methane generation from coal. Results revealed that the codigestion approach significantly enhanced the cumulative methane generation in CS1 (17.25 mmol) (coal:straw, 75:25), which was 59.52%–256.47% higher than the CS2 (coal:straw, 85:15), and WS single digestion, respectively. Moreover, the lowest methane yield (0.295 mmol/g) was achieved from single coal digestion. Particularly, the highest methane content, 68.37% in the collected biogas, was observed in CS1, followed by CS2 (49.53%), WS (44.92%), and coal (3.53%). Microbial community analysis illustrates that <i>Methanobacteriaceae</i> (51.33%) and <i>Methanosarcinaceae</i> (48.66%) were the leading archaeal communities at the peak methanogenic stage in CS1. While the abundant bacteria at this stage were <i>Hungateiclostridiaceae</i> (40.18%), <i>Rhodobacteriaceae</i> (21.40%), and <i>Lentimicrobiaceae</i> (19.20%) in CS1. According to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, several microbes were seen to be attached to the coal surface in CS1 and CS2. Moreover, the nontargeted metabolomic results showed that aromatics, aliphatic, long-chain fatty acids, and alkane (C19–C36) compounds were found to be highly expressed in only coal, CS1, and CS2 reactors compared to WS. In addition, volatile fatty acids (VFAs) analysis showed that acetic acids were abundantly present in CS1 (2,190,175 ng/ml), followed by WS (1,543,492.88 ng/ml), CS2 (1,159,050 ng/ml), and coal (50,998.31 ng/ml). These results promote the significance of using WS as a cosubstrate with coal to enhance methane production, which can be used as a fuel in power plants. Further studies are required to investigate the potential cosubstrate with coal to enhance methane production and identify the specific metabolic pathways involved.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Research","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4676624","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergistic Impacts of Wheat Straw on Coal Bio-Methanation: Insights Into Microbial Community Dynamics Toward Nontargeted Metabolomics\",\"authors\":\"Sohail Khan,&nbsp;Ze Deng,&nbsp;Irfan Ali Phulpoto,&nbsp;Anam Jalil,&nbsp;Bobo Wang,&nbsp;Zhisheng Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/4676624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Biogenic methane (BM) production from coal is quite limited due to its complex chemical nature, which makes the responsible microbes sensitive to its denaturation. In the current investigation, wheat straw (WS) at different concentrations as a cosubstrate were used with coal to augment methane generation from coal. Results revealed that the codigestion approach significantly enhanced the cumulative methane generation in CS1 (17.25 mmol) (coal:straw, 75:25), which was 59.52%–256.47% higher than the CS2 (coal:straw, 85:15), and WS single digestion, respectively. Moreover, the lowest methane yield (0.295 mmol/g) was achieved from single coal digestion. Particularly, the highest methane content, 68.37% in the collected biogas, was observed in CS1, followed by CS2 (49.53%), WS (44.92%), and coal (3.53%). Microbial community analysis illustrates that <i>Methanobacteriaceae</i> (51.33%) and <i>Methanosarcinaceae</i> (48.66%) were the leading archaeal communities at the peak methanogenic stage in CS1. While the abundant bacteria at this stage were <i>Hungateiclostridiaceae</i> (40.18%), <i>Rhodobacteriaceae</i> (21.40%), and <i>Lentimicrobiaceae</i> (19.20%) in CS1. According to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, several microbes were seen to be attached to the coal surface in CS1 and CS2. Moreover, the nontargeted metabolomic results showed that aromatics, aliphatic, long-chain fatty acids, and alkane (C19–C36) compounds were found to be highly expressed in only coal, CS1, and CS2 reactors compared to WS. In addition, volatile fatty acids (VFAs) analysis showed that acetic acids were abundantly present in CS1 (2,190,175 ng/ml), followed by WS (1,543,492.88 ng/ml), CS2 (1,159,050 ng/ml), and coal (50,998.31 ng/ml). These results promote the significance of using WS as a cosubstrate with coal to enhance methane production, which can be used as a fuel in power plants. Further studies are required to investigate the potential cosubstrate with coal to enhance methane production and identify the specific metabolic pathways involved.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Energy Research\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4676624\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Energy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4676624\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4676624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于煤的化学性质复杂,使得相关微生物对其变性非常敏感,因此从煤中产生的生物甲烷(BM)相当有限。在当前的研究中,不同浓度的小麦秸秆(WS)作为共基质与煤炭一起使用,以提高煤炭的甲烷产量。结果显示,在 CS1(煤:秸秆,75:25)(17.25 毫摩尔)和 CS2(煤:秸秆,85:15)中,协同消化法显著提高了甲烷的累积生成量,分别比 WS 单消化法高 59.52%-256.47% 。此外,单一煤炭消化的甲烷产量最低(0.295 mmol/g)。特别是,在收集的沼气中,CS1 的甲烷含量最高,为 68.37%,其次是 CS2(49.53%)、WS(44.92%)和煤(3.53%)。微生物群落分析表明,甲烷杆菌科(51.33%)和甲烷胂科(48.66%)是 CS1 中甲烷生成高峰阶段的主要古菌群落。在这一阶段,CS1 的大量细菌是 Hungateiclostridiaceae(40.18%)、Rhodobacteriaceae(21.40%)和 Lentimicrobiaceae(19.20%)。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析显示,CS1 和 CS2 的煤炭表面附着了多种微生物。此外,非目标代谢组学结果显示,与 WS 相比,只有煤、CS1 和 CS2 反应器中芳烃、脂肪族、长链脂肪酸和烷烃(C19-C36)化合物的表达量较高。此外,挥发性脂肪酸(VFAs)分析表明,乙酸在 CS1(2,190,175 纳克/毫升)中大量存在,其次是 WS(1,543,492.88 纳克/毫升)、CS2(1,159,050 纳克/毫升)和煤(50,998.31 纳克/毫升)。这些结果促进了将 WS 作为煤的共基质来提高甲烷产量的意义,甲烷可用作发电厂的燃料。还需要进一步研究与煤共底物提高甲烷产量的潜力,并确定所涉及的特定代谢途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Synergistic Impacts of Wheat Straw on Coal Bio-Methanation: Insights Into Microbial Community Dynamics Toward Nontargeted Metabolomics

Synergistic Impacts of Wheat Straw on Coal Bio-Methanation: Insights Into Microbial Community Dynamics Toward Nontargeted Metabolomics

Biogenic methane (BM) production from coal is quite limited due to its complex chemical nature, which makes the responsible microbes sensitive to its denaturation. In the current investigation, wheat straw (WS) at different concentrations as a cosubstrate were used with coal to augment methane generation from coal. Results revealed that the codigestion approach significantly enhanced the cumulative methane generation in CS1 (17.25 mmol) (coal:straw, 75:25), which was 59.52%–256.47% higher than the CS2 (coal:straw, 85:15), and WS single digestion, respectively. Moreover, the lowest methane yield (0.295 mmol/g) was achieved from single coal digestion. Particularly, the highest methane content, 68.37% in the collected biogas, was observed in CS1, followed by CS2 (49.53%), WS (44.92%), and coal (3.53%). Microbial community analysis illustrates that Methanobacteriaceae (51.33%) and Methanosarcinaceae (48.66%) were the leading archaeal communities at the peak methanogenic stage in CS1. While the abundant bacteria at this stage were Hungateiclostridiaceae (40.18%), Rhodobacteriaceae (21.40%), and Lentimicrobiaceae (19.20%) in CS1. According to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, several microbes were seen to be attached to the coal surface in CS1 and CS2. Moreover, the nontargeted metabolomic results showed that aromatics, aliphatic, long-chain fatty acids, and alkane (C19–C36) compounds were found to be highly expressed in only coal, CS1, and CS2 reactors compared to WS. In addition, volatile fatty acids (VFAs) analysis showed that acetic acids were abundantly present in CS1 (2,190,175 ng/ml), followed by WS (1,543,492.88 ng/ml), CS2 (1,159,050 ng/ml), and coal (50,998.31 ng/ml). These results promote the significance of using WS as a cosubstrate with coal to enhance methane production, which can be used as a fuel in power plants. Further studies are required to investigate the potential cosubstrate with coal to enhance methane production and identify the specific metabolic pathways involved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Energy Research
International Journal of Energy Research 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1170
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Energy Research (IJER) is dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, unique platform for researchers, scientists, engineers, technology developers, planners, and policy makers to present their research results and findings in a compelling manner on novel energy systems and applications. IJER covers the entire spectrum of energy from production to conversion, conservation, management, systems, technologies, etc. We encourage papers submissions aiming at better efficiency, cost improvements, more effective resource use, improved design and analysis, reduced environmental impact, and hence leading to better sustainability. IJER is concerned with the development and exploitation of both advanced traditional and new energy sources, systems, technologies and applications. Interdisciplinary subjects in the area of novel energy systems and applications are also encouraged. High-quality research papers are solicited in, but are not limited to, the following areas with innovative and novel contents: -Biofuels and alternatives -Carbon capturing and storage technologies -Clean coal technologies -Energy conversion, conservation and management -Energy storage -Energy systems -Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation -Hydrogen energy and fuel cells -Hydrogen production technologies -Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies -Nuclear energy -Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass) -Smart energy system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信