通过将牧草高度与不同的气象数据汇总相结合,预测小型农场的牧草生物量

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Luca Scheurer, Joerg Leukel, Tobias Zimpel, Jessica Werner, Sari Perdana-Decker, Uta Dickhoefer
{"title":"通过将牧草高度与不同的气象数据汇总相结合,预测小型农场的牧草生物量","authors":"Luca Scheurer,&nbsp;Joerg Leukel,&nbsp;Tobias Zimpel,&nbsp;Jessica Werner,&nbsp;Sari Perdana-Decker,&nbsp;Uta Dickhoefer","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate predictions of herbage biomass are important for efficient grazing management. Small-scale farms face challenges using remote sensing technologies due to insufficient resources. This limitation hinders their ability to develop machine learning-based prediction models. An alternative is to adopt less expensive measurement methods and readily available data such as weather data. This study aimed to examine how different temporal aggregations of weather data combined with compressed sward height (CSH) affect the prediction performance. We considered weather features based on different numbers of weather variables, statistical functions, weather events, and periods. Between 2019 and 2021, data were collected from 11 organic dairy farms in Germany. Herbage biomass exhibited high variability (coefficient of variation [CV] = 0.65). Weather data were obtained from on-farm and nearby public stations. Prediction models were learned on a training set (<i>n</i> = 291) and evaluated on a test set (<i>n</i> = 125). Random forest models performed better than models based on artificial neural networks and support vector regression. Representing weather data by a single feature for leaf wetness reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) by 12.1% (from 536 to 471 kg DM ha<sup>−1</sup>, where DM is dry matter) and increased the <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> by 0.109 (from 0.518 to 0.627). Adding features based on multiple variables, functions, events, and periods resulted in a further reduction in RMSE by 15.9% (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.737). Overall, different aggregations of weather data enhanced the accuracy of CSH-based models. These aggregations do not cause additional effort for data collection and, therefore, should be integrated into CSH-based models for small-scale farms.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 6","pages":"3205-3221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21705","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting herbage biomass on small-scale farms by combining sward height with different aggregations of weather data\",\"authors\":\"Luca Scheurer,&nbsp;Joerg Leukel,&nbsp;Tobias Zimpel,&nbsp;Jessica Werner,&nbsp;Sari Perdana-Decker,&nbsp;Uta Dickhoefer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate predictions of herbage biomass are important for efficient grazing management. Small-scale farms face challenges using remote sensing technologies due to insufficient resources. This limitation hinders their ability to develop machine learning-based prediction models. An alternative is to adopt less expensive measurement methods and readily available data such as weather data. This study aimed to examine how different temporal aggregations of weather data combined with compressed sward height (CSH) affect the prediction performance. We considered weather features based on different numbers of weather variables, statistical functions, weather events, and periods. Between 2019 and 2021, data were collected from 11 organic dairy farms in Germany. Herbage biomass exhibited high variability (coefficient of variation [CV] = 0.65). Weather data were obtained from on-farm and nearby public stations. Prediction models were learned on a training set (<i>n</i> = 291) and evaluated on a test set (<i>n</i> = 125). Random forest models performed better than models based on artificial neural networks and support vector regression. Representing weather data by a single feature for leaf wetness reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) by 12.1% (from 536 to 471 kg DM ha<sup>−1</sup>, where DM is dry matter) and increased the <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> by 0.109 (from 0.518 to 0.627). Adding features based on multiple variables, functions, events, and periods resulted in a further reduction in RMSE by 15.9% (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.737). Overall, different aggregations of weather data enhanced the accuracy of CSH-based models. These aggregations do not cause additional effort for data collection and, therefore, should be integrated into CSH-based models for small-scale farms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"116 6\",\"pages\":\"3205-3221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21705\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21705\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确预测牧草生物量对高效放牧管理非常重要。由于资源不足,小型农场在使用遥感技术方面面临挑战。这种限制阻碍了他们开发基于机器学习的预测模型的能力。一种替代方法是采用成本较低的测量方法和现成的数据,如天气数据。本研究旨在探讨不同时间段的天气数据集合与压缩草皮高度(CSH)的结合如何影响预测性能。我们考虑了基于不同天气变量数量、统计函数、天气事件和时段的天气特征。2019 年至 2021 年期间,我们从德国 11 个有机奶牛场收集了数据。垃圾生物量表现出很高的变异性(变异系数 [CV] = 0.65)。天气数据来自农场和附近的公共站点。预测模型在训练集(n = 291)上学习,并在测试集(n = 125)上进行评估。随机森林模型的表现优于基于人工神经网络和支持向量回归的模型。通过叶片湿润度这一单一特征来表示天气数据,可将均方根误差 (RMSE) 降低 12.1%(从 536 千克 DM ha-1 降至 471 千克 DM ha-1,其中 DM 为干物质),并将 R2 提高 0.109(从 0.518 升至 0.627)。增加基于多个变量、函数、事件和时期的特征后,RMSE 进一步降低了 15.9%(R2 = 0.737)。总体而言,对天气数据进行不同的聚合可提高基于 CSH 的模型的准确性。这些聚合不会增加数据收集的工作量,因此应将其纳入基于 CSH 的小型农场模型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predicting herbage biomass on small-scale farms by combining sward height with different aggregations of weather data

Predicting herbage biomass on small-scale farms by combining sward height with different aggregations of weather data

Accurate predictions of herbage biomass are important for efficient grazing management. Small-scale farms face challenges using remote sensing technologies due to insufficient resources. This limitation hinders their ability to develop machine learning-based prediction models. An alternative is to adopt less expensive measurement methods and readily available data such as weather data. This study aimed to examine how different temporal aggregations of weather data combined with compressed sward height (CSH) affect the prediction performance. We considered weather features based on different numbers of weather variables, statistical functions, weather events, and periods. Between 2019 and 2021, data were collected from 11 organic dairy farms in Germany. Herbage biomass exhibited high variability (coefficient of variation [CV] = 0.65). Weather data were obtained from on-farm and nearby public stations. Prediction models were learned on a training set (n = 291) and evaluated on a test set (n = 125). Random forest models performed better than models based on artificial neural networks and support vector regression. Representing weather data by a single feature for leaf wetness reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) by 12.1% (from 536 to 471 kg DM ha−1, where DM is dry matter) and increased the R2 by 0.109 (from 0.518 to 0.627). Adding features based on multiple variables, functions, events, and periods resulted in a further reduction in RMSE by 15.9% (R2 = 0.737). Overall, different aggregations of weather data enhanced the accuracy of CSH-based models. These aggregations do not cause additional effort for data collection and, therefore, should be integrated into CSH-based models for small-scale farms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信