{"title":"通过将牧草高度与不同的气象数据汇总相结合,预测小型农场的牧草生物量","authors":"Luca Scheurer, Joerg Leukel, Tobias Zimpel, Jessica Werner, Sari Perdana-Decker, Uta Dickhoefer","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate predictions of herbage biomass are important for efficient grazing management. Small-scale farms face challenges using remote sensing technologies due to insufficient resources. This limitation hinders their ability to develop machine learning-based prediction models. An alternative is to adopt less expensive measurement methods and readily available data such as weather data. This study aimed to examine how different temporal aggregations of weather data combined with compressed sward height (CSH) affect the prediction performance. We considered weather features based on different numbers of weather variables, statistical functions, weather events, and periods. Between 2019 and 2021, data were collected from 11 organic dairy farms in Germany. Herbage biomass exhibited high variability (coefficient of variation [CV] = 0.65). Weather data were obtained from on-farm and nearby public stations. Prediction models were learned on a training set (<i>n</i> = 291) and evaluated on a test set (<i>n</i> = 125). Random forest models performed better than models based on artificial neural networks and support vector regression. Representing weather data by a single feature for leaf wetness reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) by 12.1% (from 536 to 471 kg DM ha<sup>−1</sup>, where DM is dry matter) and increased the <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> by 0.109 (from 0.518 to 0.627). Adding features based on multiple variables, functions, events, and periods resulted in a further reduction in RMSE by 15.9% (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.737). Overall, different aggregations of weather data enhanced the accuracy of CSH-based models. These aggregations do not cause additional effort for data collection and, therefore, should be integrated into CSH-based models for small-scale farms.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 6","pages":"3205-3221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21705","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting herbage biomass on small-scale farms by combining sward height with different aggregations of weather data\",\"authors\":\"Luca Scheurer, Joerg Leukel, Tobias Zimpel, Jessica Werner, Sari Perdana-Decker, Uta Dickhoefer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate predictions of herbage biomass are important for efficient grazing management. Small-scale farms face challenges using remote sensing technologies due to insufficient resources. This limitation hinders their ability to develop machine learning-based prediction models. An alternative is to adopt less expensive measurement methods and readily available data such as weather data. This study aimed to examine how different temporal aggregations of weather data combined with compressed sward height (CSH) affect the prediction performance. We considered weather features based on different numbers of weather variables, statistical functions, weather events, and periods. Between 2019 and 2021, data were collected from 11 organic dairy farms in Germany. Herbage biomass exhibited high variability (coefficient of variation [CV] = 0.65). Weather data were obtained from on-farm and nearby public stations. Prediction models were learned on a training set (<i>n</i> = 291) and evaluated on a test set (<i>n</i> = 125). Random forest models performed better than models based on artificial neural networks and support vector regression. Representing weather data by a single feature for leaf wetness reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) by 12.1% (from 536 to 471 kg DM ha<sup>−1</sup>, where DM is dry matter) and increased the <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> by 0.109 (from 0.518 to 0.627). Adding features based on multiple variables, functions, events, and periods resulted in a further reduction in RMSE by 15.9% (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.737). Overall, different aggregations of weather data enhanced the accuracy of CSH-based models. These aggregations do not cause additional effort for data collection and, therefore, should be integrated into CSH-based models for small-scale farms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"116 6\",\"pages\":\"3205-3221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21705\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21705\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting herbage biomass on small-scale farms by combining sward height with different aggregations of weather data
Accurate predictions of herbage biomass are important for efficient grazing management. Small-scale farms face challenges using remote sensing technologies due to insufficient resources. This limitation hinders their ability to develop machine learning-based prediction models. An alternative is to adopt less expensive measurement methods and readily available data such as weather data. This study aimed to examine how different temporal aggregations of weather data combined with compressed sward height (CSH) affect the prediction performance. We considered weather features based on different numbers of weather variables, statistical functions, weather events, and periods. Between 2019 and 2021, data were collected from 11 organic dairy farms in Germany. Herbage biomass exhibited high variability (coefficient of variation [CV] = 0.65). Weather data were obtained from on-farm and nearby public stations. Prediction models were learned on a training set (n = 291) and evaluated on a test set (n = 125). Random forest models performed better than models based on artificial neural networks and support vector regression. Representing weather data by a single feature for leaf wetness reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) by 12.1% (from 536 to 471 kg DM ha−1, where DM is dry matter) and increased the R2 by 0.109 (from 0.518 to 0.627). Adding features based on multiple variables, functions, events, and periods resulted in a further reduction in RMSE by 15.9% (R2 = 0.737). Overall, different aggregations of weather data enhanced the accuracy of CSH-based models. These aggregations do not cause additional effort for data collection and, therefore, should be integrated into CSH-based models for small-scale farms.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.