评估研究生一年级住院医师项目主任在评估住院医师候选人时的偏好和优先事项。

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Micaela Warfield, Scott D Nei, Kristin C Cole, Abby K Krauter
{"title":"评估研究生一年级住院医师项目主任在评估住院医师候选人时的偏好和优先事项。","authors":"Micaela Warfield, Scott D Nei, Kristin C Cole, Abby K Krauter","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited and conflicting evidence exists evaluating how components of pharmacy residency applications are prioritized by residency program directors (RPDs). This study aims to identify what pharmacy residency programs prioritize when selecting candidates to interview given the incorporation of new American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) Pharmacy Residency Standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Qualtrics survey was distributed to postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) RPDs across the United States. Programs were identified using the American College of Clinical Pharmacy and ASHP residency directory. Data was collected from October 23, 2023, to December 4, 2023, and priorities were captured using percentage weighting and rank order lists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1389 survey links disseminated, a total of 254 programs submitted responses for a total response rate of 18.2%. According to RPDs the highest weighted section of a residency application was the curriculum vitae (CV) with an average weight of 51.7% followed by letters of recommendation, letter of intent, and supplemental application (if applicable) in descending order, respectively. Within the CV, programs valued work, leadership, and rotation experiences most. Ability to organize and manage time was reported to be the most important characteristic within letters of recommendation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results of this study, when reviewing pharmacy residency applications, PGY1 RPDs prioritize the CV, followed by letters of recommendation and letter of intent. These findings could be used by RPDs when assessing current scoring rubrics and may help to inform the efforts of students and letter of recommendation writers when preparing individual components of an application.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101323"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Postgraduate Year 1 Residency Program Director Preferences and Priorities in Evaluation of Pharmacy Residency Candidates.\",\"authors\":\"Micaela Warfield, Scott D Nei, Kristin C Cole, Abby K Krauter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited and conflicting evidence exists evaluating how components of pharmacy residency applications are prioritized by residency program directors (RPDs). This study aims to identify what pharmacy residency programs prioritize when selecting candidates to interview given the incorporation of new American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) Pharmacy Residency Standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Qualtrics survey was distributed to postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) RPDs across the United States. Programs were identified using the American College of Clinical Pharmacy and ASHP residency directory. Data was collected from October 23, 2023, to December 4, 2023, and priorities were captured using percentage weighting and rank order lists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1389 survey links disseminated, a total of 254 programs submitted responses for a total response rate of 18.2%. According to RPDs the highest weighted section of a residency application was the curriculum vitae (CV) with an average weight of 51.7% followed by letters of recommendation, letter of intent, and supplemental application (if applicable) in descending order, respectively. Within the CV, programs valued work, leadership, and rotation experiences most. Ability to organize and manage time was reported to be the most important characteristic within letters of recommendation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results of this study, when reviewing pharmacy residency applications, PGY1 RPDs prioritize the CV, followed by letters of recommendation and letter of intent. These findings could be used by RPDs when assessing current scoring rubrics and may help to inform the efforts of students and letter of recommendation writers when preparing individual components of an application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101323\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于住院医师培训项目主任(RPDs)如何优先考虑药学住院医师培训申请内容的评估证据有限且相互矛盾。本研究旨在确定在纳入新的美国卫生系统药剂师协会(ASHP)药学住院医师标准的情况下,药学住院医师项目在选择面试候选人时会优先考虑哪些因素:我们向全美的研究生一年级(PGY1)住院医师发放了一份 Qualtrics 调查问卷。通过美国临床药学院和 ASHP 住院医师目录确定了这些项目。数据收集时间为 2023 年 10 月 23 日至 2023 年 12 月 4 日,优先级采用百分比加权法和排序列表法:在发布的 1389 个调查链接中,共有 254 个项目提交了回复,总回复率为 18.2%。根据住院医师培训项目的调查,住院医师培训申请中权重最高的部分是简历,平均权重为 51.7%,其次依次是推荐信、意向书和补充申请(如适用)。在简历中,项目最看重的是工作、领导能力和轮转经历。在推荐信中,组织和管理时间的能力被认为是最重要的特征:根据这项研究的结果,在审核药学住院实习申请时,PGY1 的 RPD 会优先考虑个人简历,其次是推荐信和意向书。住院医师在评估目前的评分标准时可以利用这些发现,并有助于学生和推荐信作者在准备申请材料的各个部分时有所参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Postgraduate Year 1 Residency Program Director Preferences and Priorities in Evaluation of Pharmacy Residency Candidates.

Objective: Limited and conflicting evidence exists evaluating how components of pharmacy residency applications are prioritized by residency program directors (RPDs). This study aims to identify what pharmacy residency programs prioritize when selecting candidates to interview given the incorporation of new American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) Pharmacy Residency Standards.

Methods: A Qualtrics survey was distributed to postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) RPDs across the United States. Programs were identified using the American College of Clinical Pharmacy and ASHP residency directory. Data was collected from October 23, 2023, to December 4, 2023, and priorities were captured using percentage weighting and rank order lists.

Results: Of the 1389 survey links disseminated, a total of 254 programs submitted responses for a total response rate of 18.2%. According to RPDs the highest weighted section of a residency application was the curriculum vitae (CV) with an average weight of 51.7% followed by letters of recommendation, letter of intent, and supplemental application (if applicable) in descending order, respectively. Within the CV, programs valued work, leadership, and rotation experiences most. Ability to organize and manage time was reported to be the most important characteristic within letters of recommendation.

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, when reviewing pharmacy residency applications, PGY1 RPDs prioritize the CV, followed by letters of recommendation and letter of intent. These findings could be used by RPDs when assessing current scoring rubrics and may help to inform the efforts of students and letter of recommendation writers when preparing individual components of an application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信