Micaela N. Warfield , Scott D. Nei , Kristin C. Cole , Abby K. Krauter
{"title":"评估研究生一年级住院医师项目主任在评估住院医师候选人时的偏好和优先事项。","authors":"Micaela N. Warfield , Scott D. Nei , Kristin C. Cole , Abby K. Krauter","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Limited and conflicting evidence exists evaluating how components of pharmacy residency applications are prioritized by residency program directors (RPDs). This study aims to identify what pharmacy residency programs prioritize when selecting candidates to interview given the incorporation of new American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Pharmacy Residency Standards.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A Qualtrics survey was distributed to postgraduate year 1 RPDs across the United States. Programs were identified using the American College of Clinical Pharmacy and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists residency directory. Data were collected from October 23, 2023 to December 4, 2023, and priorities were captured using percentage weighting and rank order lists.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1389 survey links disseminated, a total of 254 programs submitted responses for a response rate of 18.2%. According to RPDs, the highest weighted section of a residency application was the curriculum vitae (CV), with an average weight of 51.7%, followed by letters of recommendation, letter of intent, and supplemental application (if applicable) in descending order. Within the CV, programs valued <em>work</em>, <em>leadership</em>, and <em>rotation experiences</em> most. <em>Ability to organize and manage time</em> was reported to be the most important characteristic within letters of recommendation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Based on the results of this study, when reviewing pharmacy residency applications, postgraduate year 1 RPDs prioritize the CV, followed by letters of recommendation and letter of intent. These findings could be used by RPDs when assessing current scoring rubrics and may help to inform the efforts of students and letter of recommendation writers when preparing individual components of an application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"88 12","pages":"Article 101323"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Postgraduate Year 1 Residency Program Director Preferences and Priorities in Evaluation of Pharmacy Residency Candidates\",\"authors\":\"Micaela N. Warfield , Scott D. Nei , Kristin C. Cole , Abby K. Krauter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Limited and conflicting evidence exists evaluating how components of pharmacy residency applications are prioritized by residency program directors (RPDs). This study aims to identify what pharmacy residency programs prioritize when selecting candidates to interview given the incorporation of new American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Pharmacy Residency Standards.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A Qualtrics survey was distributed to postgraduate year 1 RPDs across the United States. Programs were identified using the American College of Clinical Pharmacy and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists residency directory. Data were collected from October 23, 2023 to December 4, 2023, and priorities were captured using percentage weighting and rank order lists.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1389 survey links disseminated, a total of 254 programs submitted responses for a response rate of 18.2%. According to RPDs, the highest weighted section of a residency application was the curriculum vitae (CV), with an average weight of 51.7%, followed by letters of recommendation, letter of intent, and supplemental application (if applicable) in descending order. Within the CV, programs valued <em>work</em>, <em>leadership</em>, and <em>rotation experiences</em> most. <em>Ability to organize and manage time</em> was reported to be the most important characteristic within letters of recommendation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Based on the results of this study, when reviewing pharmacy residency applications, postgraduate year 1 RPDs prioritize the CV, followed by letters of recommendation and letter of intent. These findings could be used by RPDs when assessing current scoring rubrics and may help to inform the efforts of students and letter of recommendation writers when preparing individual components of an application.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"88 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 101323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000294592411042X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000294592411042X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of Postgraduate Year 1 Residency Program Director Preferences and Priorities in Evaluation of Pharmacy Residency Candidates
Objective
Limited and conflicting evidence exists evaluating how components of pharmacy residency applications are prioritized by residency program directors (RPDs). This study aims to identify what pharmacy residency programs prioritize when selecting candidates to interview given the incorporation of new American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Pharmacy Residency Standards.
Methods
A Qualtrics survey was distributed to postgraduate year 1 RPDs across the United States. Programs were identified using the American College of Clinical Pharmacy and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists residency directory. Data were collected from October 23, 2023 to December 4, 2023, and priorities were captured using percentage weighting and rank order lists.
Results
Of the 1389 survey links disseminated, a total of 254 programs submitted responses for a response rate of 18.2%. According to RPDs, the highest weighted section of a residency application was the curriculum vitae (CV), with an average weight of 51.7%, followed by letters of recommendation, letter of intent, and supplemental application (if applicable) in descending order. Within the CV, programs valued work, leadership, and rotation experiences most. Ability to organize and manage time was reported to be the most important characteristic within letters of recommendation.
Conclusion
Based on the results of this study, when reviewing pharmacy residency applications, postgraduate year 1 RPDs prioritize the CV, followed by letters of recommendation and letter of intent. These findings could be used by RPDs when assessing current scoring rubrics and may help to inform the efforts of students and letter of recommendation writers when preparing individual components of an application.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.