在产科重症患者中使用 28 项治疗干预评分系统 (TISS-28) 检测多器官功能障碍的实用性:前瞻性队列研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jose Rojas-Suarez, Jeniffer González-Hernández, Diana Borre-Naranjo, Alejandra Vergara-Schotborgh, Laura Saavedra-Valencia, Carmelo Dueñas-Castell, Jose Santacruz-Arias, Wendy Pollock
{"title":"在产科重症患者中使用 28 项治疗干预评分系统 (TISS-28) 检测多器官功能障碍的实用性:前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Jose Rojas-Suarez, Jeniffer González-Hernández, Diana Borre-Naranjo, Alejandra Vergara-Schotborgh, Laura Saavedra-Valencia, Carmelo Dueñas-Castell, Jose Santacruz-Arias, Wendy Pollock","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the effectiveness of the 28-item Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) in detecting multiorgan dysfunction (MOD) among critically ill obstetric patients and compared its predictive potential to other severity models, such as Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Mortality Probability Model II (MPM II).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted including obstetric patients, pregnant and up to 42 days postpartum, admitted to the intensive care units of two referral hospitals in Colombia. A total of 93 patients were recruited between March 2016 and February 2017 and from September 2019 to November 2019. Scores from the MPM II, SOFA, and TISS-28 were calculated within the first 24 h post-intensive care unit admission. The primary outcome was to evaluate the effectiveness of TISS-28 in predicting MOD, as defined by the World Health Organization near-miss criteria. We compared the TISS-28 with SOFA and MPM II scores in identifying MOD using the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 93 patients were analysed, of whom 22 developed MOD. Hypertensive disorders were the predominant diagnosis (n = 62; 66.7%). Patients with sepsis exhibited the highest TISS-28 score, indicating more intensive therapeutic interventions. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for TISS-28, SOFA, and MPM II were 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.92), 0.66 (0.51-0.80), and 0.59 (0.43-0.74), respectively (p = 0.001). The cut-off value of a TISS-28 score ≥21 was associated with an increased likelihood of MOD (sensitivity: 83.2%, specificity: 71.2%), a positive predictive value of 47.3%, and a negative predictive value) of 93.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TISS-28 demonstrated robust performance in identifying MOD among obstetric patients compared to other severity indexes. The TISS-28 score complements physiology-derived severity scores by reflecting the level of care required, making it a valuable tool in risk stratification and resource allocation for critically ill obstetric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"101137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The usefulness of a 28-item Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) in critically ill obstetric patients to detect multiorgan dysfunction: A prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Jose Rojas-Suarez, Jeniffer González-Hernández, Diana Borre-Naranjo, Alejandra Vergara-Schotborgh, Laura Saavedra-Valencia, Carmelo Dueñas-Castell, Jose Santacruz-Arias, Wendy Pollock\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the effectiveness of the 28-item Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) in detecting multiorgan dysfunction (MOD) among critically ill obstetric patients and compared its predictive potential to other severity models, such as Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Mortality Probability Model II (MPM II).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted including obstetric patients, pregnant and up to 42 days postpartum, admitted to the intensive care units of two referral hospitals in Colombia. A total of 93 patients were recruited between March 2016 and February 2017 and from September 2019 to November 2019. Scores from the MPM II, SOFA, and TISS-28 were calculated within the first 24 h post-intensive care unit admission. The primary outcome was to evaluate the effectiveness of TISS-28 in predicting MOD, as defined by the World Health Organization near-miss criteria. We compared the TISS-28 with SOFA and MPM II scores in identifying MOD using the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 93 patients were analysed, of whom 22 developed MOD. Hypertensive disorders were the predominant diagnosis (n = 62; 66.7%). Patients with sepsis exhibited the highest TISS-28 score, indicating more intensive therapeutic interventions. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for TISS-28, SOFA, and MPM II were 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.92), 0.66 (0.51-0.80), and 0.59 (0.43-0.74), respectively (p = 0.001). The cut-off value of a TISS-28 score ≥21 was associated with an increased likelihood of MOD (sensitivity: 83.2%, specificity: 71.2%), a positive predictive value of 47.3%, and a negative predictive value) of 93.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TISS-28 demonstrated robust performance in identifying MOD among obstetric patients compared to other severity indexes. The TISS-28 score complements physiology-derived severity scores by reflecting the level of care required, making it a valuable tool in risk stratification and resource allocation for critically ill obstetric patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101137\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究评估了28项治疗干预评分系统(TISS-28)在检测重症产科病人多器官功能障碍(MOD)方面的有效性,并将其预测潜力与其他严重程度模型(如序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和死亡率概率模型II(MPM II))进行了比较:这项前瞻性多中心队列研究的对象包括哥伦比亚两家转诊医院重症监护室收治的妊娠期和产后 42 天内的产科病人。在2016年3月至2017年2月以及2019年9月至2019年11月期间,共招募了93名患者。在重症监护室入院后的头 24 小时内计算了 MPM II、SOFA 和 TISS-28 的得分。主要结果是评估 TISS-28 在预测 MOD(由世界卫生组织近乎失误标准定义)方面的有效性。我们使用阳性预测值、阴性预测值和接收器操作特征曲线下面积比较了 TISS-28 与 SOFA 和 MPM II 评分在识别 MOD 方面的效果:结果:分析了 93 名患者的数据,其中 22 人发展为 MOD。高血压疾病是主要的诊断依据(n = 62;66.7%)。脓毒症患者的 TISS-28 评分最高,表明需要更多的治疗干预。TISS-28、SOFA 和 MPM II 的接收器操作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.83(95% 置信区间:0.73-0.92)、0.66(0.51-0.80)和 0.59(0.43-0.74)(P = 0.001)。TISS-28评分≥21分的临界值与发生MOD的可能性增加有关(灵敏度:83.2%,特异性:71.2%),阳性预测值为47.3%,阴性预测值为93.2%:与其他严重程度指数相比,TISS-28 在识别产科病人的 MOD 方面表现出色。TISS-28评分反映了所需的护理水平,是对生理学严重程度评分的补充,因此是产科重症患者进行风险分层和资源分配的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The usefulness of a 28-item Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) in critically ill obstetric patients to detect multiorgan dysfunction: A prospective cohort study.

Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of the 28-item Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) in detecting multiorgan dysfunction (MOD) among critically ill obstetric patients and compared its predictive potential to other severity models, such as Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Mortality Probability Model II (MPM II).

Methods: A prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted including obstetric patients, pregnant and up to 42 days postpartum, admitted to the intensive care units of two referral hospitals in Colombia. A total of 93 patients were recruited between March 2016 and February 2017 and from September 2019 to November 2019. Scores from the MPM II, SOFA, and TISS-28 were calculated within the first 24 h post-intensive care unit admission. The primary outcome was to evaluate the effectiveness of TISS-28 in predicting MOD, as defined by the World Health Organization near-miss criteria. We compared the TISS-28 with SOFA and MPM II scores in identifying MOD using the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: Data from 93 patients were analysed, of whom 22 developed MOD. Hypertensive disorders were the predominant diagnosis (n = 62; 66.7%). Patients with sepsis exhibited the highest TISS-28 score, indicating more intensive therapeutic interventions. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for TISS-28, SOFA, and MPM II were 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.92), 0.66 (0.51-0.80), and 0.59 (0.43-0.74), respectively (p = 0.001). The cut-off value of a TISS-28 score ≥21 was associated with an increased likelihood of MOD (sensitivity: 83.2%, specificity: 71.2%), a positive predictive value of 47.3%, and a negative predictive value) of 93.2%.

Conclusions: TISS-28 demonstrated robust performance in identifying MOD among obstetric patients compared to other severity indexes. The TISS-28 score complements physiology-derived severity scores by reflecting the level of care required, making it a valuable tool in risk stratification and resource allocation for critically ill obstetric patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信