Yi Zhang, Guangyang Ou, Rongkang Li, Lei Peng, Jianguo Shi
{"title":"良性前列腺增生与前列腺癌之间的因果关系:双向孟德尔随机分析。","authors":"Yi Zhang, Guangyang Ou, Rongkang Li, Lei Peng, Jianguo Shi","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgae163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim is to explore the relation between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) from a genetic level utilizing Mendelian randomization (MR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IEU genome-wide association studies database was surveyed for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with BPH, PCa, and PCa (validation cohort). Single nucleotide polymorphisms were subjected to stringent quality control based on rigorous screening criteria. BPH and PCa risk were evaluated using the inverse-variance weighted method (IVW), MR-Egger, simple mode, weighted median, and weighted mode. Horizontal pleiotropy of single nucleotide polymorphisms was assessed using the MR-Egger intercept test, while heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q test. Reverse causality was assessed by evaluating PCa as the exposure and BPH as the outcome. A validation database was used to verify the exposure and outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk of PCa increased significantly with genetically predicted BPH (IVW: OR [95% CI] = 1.3849 × 107 [2330, 8.2294 × 1010], P = 2.0814 × 10-4). In reverse MR analysis, PCa also increased the risk of BPH (IVW: OR [95% CI] = 1.0011 [1.0003, 1.0019], P = 0.0031). The findings were consistent with the MR analysis results of the PCa validation cohort. Sensitivity analyses indicated the presence of heterogeneity but no horizontal pleiotropy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study presents proof of a significant bidirectional causal relationship between genetically predicted BPH and an increased risk of PCa. Key message Three research questions and three bullet points What is already known on this topic? Observational studies suggest a controversial relationship between BPH and PCa. MR allows investigation of causality using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs). What does this study add? The study presents proof of a significant bidirectional causal relationship between genetically predicted BPH and an increased risk of PCa. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy? Recognizing the bidirectional relationship between BPH and PCa, men diagnosed with BPH may benefit from more stringent PCa screening protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal relationship between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yi Zhang, Guangyang Ou, Rongkang Li, Lei Peng, Jianguo Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/postmj/qgae163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim is to explore the relation between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) from a genetic level utilizing Mendelian randomization (MR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IEU genome-wide association studies database was surveyed for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with BPH, PCa, and PCa (validation cohort). Single nucleotide polymorphisms were subjected to stringent quality control based on rigorous screening criteria. BPH and PCa risk were evaluated using the inverse-variance weighted method (IVW), MR-Egger, simple mode, weighted median, and weighted mode. Horizontal pleiotropy of single nucleotide polymorphisms was assessed using the MR-Egger intercept test, while heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q test. Reverse causality was assessed by evaluating PCa as the exposure and BPH as the outcome. A validation database was used to verify the exposure and outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk of PCa increased significantly with genetically predicted BPH (IVW: OR [95% CI] = 1.3849 × 107 [2330, 8.2294 × 1010], P = 2.0814 × 10-4). In reverse MR analysis, PCa also increased the risk of BPH (IVW: OR [95% CI] = 1.0011 [1.0003, 1.0019], P = 0.0031). The findings were consistent with the MR analysis results of the PCa validation cohort. Sensitivity analyses indicated the presence of heterogeneity but no horizontal pleiotropy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study presents proof of a significant bidirectional causal relationship between genetically predicted BPH and an increased risk of PCa. Key message Three research questions and three bullet points What is already known on this topic? Observational studies suggest a controversial relationship between BPH and PCa. MR allows investigation of causality using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs). What does this study add? The study presents proof of a significant bidirectional causal relationship between genetically predicted BPH and an increased risk of PCa. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy? Recognizing the bidirectional relationship between BPH and PCa, men diagnosed with BPH may benefit from more stringent PCa screening protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae163\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Causal relationship between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis.
Objective: Our aim is to explore the relation between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) from a genetic level utilizing Mendelian randomization (MR).
Methods: The IEU genome-wide association studies database was surveyed for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with BPH, PCa, and PCa (validation cohort). Single nucleotide polymorphisms were subjected to stringent quality control based on rigorous screening criteria. BPH and PCa risk were evaluated using the inverse-variance weighted method (IVW), MR-Egger, simple mode, weighted median, and weighted mode. Horizontal pleiotropy of single nucleotide polymorphisms was assessed using the MR-Egger intercept test, while heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q test. Reverse causality was assessed by evaluating PCa as the exposure and BPH as the outcome. A validation database was used to verify the exposure and outcome.
Results: The risk of PCa increased significantly with genetically predicted BPH (IVW: OR [95% CI] = 1.3849 × 107 [2330, 8.2294 × 1010], P = 2.0814 × 10-4). In reverse MR analysis, PCa also increased the risk of BPH (IVW: OR [95% CI] = 1.0011 [1.0003, 1.0019], P = 0.0031). The findings were consistent with the MR analysis results of the PCa validation cohort. Sensitivity analyses indicated the presence of heterogeneity but no horizontal pleiotropy.
Conclusion: The study presents proof of a significant bidirectional causal relationship between genetically predicted BPH and an increased risk of PCa. Key message Three research questions and three bullet points What is already known on this topic? Observational studies suggest a controversial relationship between BPH and PCa. MR allows investigation of causality using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs). What does this study add? The study presents proof of a significant bidirectional causal relationship between genetically predicted BPH and an increased risk of PCa. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy? Recognizing the bidirectional relationship between BPH and PCa, men diagnosed with BPH may benefit from more stringent PCa screening protocols.
期刊介绍:
Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.