富含益生菌的饮食和/或益生菌补充剂对人类认知的影响:"肠道感觉 "随机对照试验的次要结果。

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Tanya M Freijy, Lachlan Cribb, Georgina Oliver, Najwa-Joelle Metri, Rachelle S Opie, Felice N Jacka, Jason A Hawrelak, Julia J Rucklidge, Chee H Ng, Jerome Sarris
{"title":"富含益生菌的饮食和/或益生菌补充剂对人类认知的影响:\"肠道感觉 \"随机对照试验的次要结果。","authors":"Tanya M Freijy, Lachlan Cribb, Georgina Oliver, Najwa-Joelle Metri, Rachelle S Opie, Felice N Jacka, Jason A Hawrelak, Julia J Rucklidge, Chee H Ng, Jerome Sarris","doi":"10.1080/1028415X.2024.2425570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging evidence indicates that gut microbiota-targeted interventions may lead to improvements in cognition. We assessed whether a prebiotic-rich dietary intervention, probiotic supplement, or synbiotic combination of both would improve human cognition, as part of the 'Gut Feelings' trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An 8-week, 2 × 2 factorial randomised controlled trial was conducted on 118 adults with low mood and potential for dietary improvement. Treatment arms: (1) probiotic supplement and diet-as-usual (probiotic group); (2) high-prebiotic diet and placebo supplement (prebiotic diet group); (3) probiotic supplement and high-prebiotic diet (synbiotic group); and (4) placebo supplement and diet-as-usual (placebo group). At baseline and 8-weeks, the Cogstate Brief Battery was administered, testing processing speed, attention, visual learning, and working memory. Data were analysed using Bayesian linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found weak evidence that the probiotic improved working memory (Cohen's <i>d</i> = -0.32, 95% CI: -0.67, 0.03; posterior probability [post. prob] of benefit: 96%). For the other treatments, there was little or no evidence of cognitive improvement. We found weak evidence that the prebiotic diet impaired processing speed (<i>d</i> = 0.25, 95% CI: -0.02, 0.51; post. prob of harm: 97%). There was little indication of a synergistic interaction between the probiotic and prebiotic diet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found suggestive evidence of a probiotic-induced improvement in working memory, and prebiotic-induced impairment in processing speed. However, the evidence remains inconclusive regarding any cognitive benefit or harm induced by the probiotic, prebiotic diet, or synbiotic treatments. Larger intervention studies are recommended, with inclusion of neuroimaging or electrophysiology measures.<b>Trial Registration:</b> Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000795392; registered 31 May 2017).</p>","PeriodicalId":19423,"journal":{"name":"Nutritional Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of a prebiotic-rich diet and/or probiotic supplements on human cognition: secondary outcomes from the 'gut feelings' randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tanya M Freijy, Lachlan Cribb, Georgina Oliver, Najwa-Joelle Metri, Rachelle S Opie, Felice N Jacka, Jason A Hawrelak, Julia J Rucklidge, Chee H Ng, Jerome Sarris\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1028415X.2024.2425570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging evidence indicates that gut microbiota-targeted interventions may lead to improvements in cognition. We assessed whether a prebiotic-rich dietary intervention, probiotic supplement, or synbiotic combination of both would improve human cognition, as part of the 'Gut Feelings' trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An 8-week, 2 × 2 factorial randomised controlled trial was conducted on 118 adults with low mood and potential for dietary improvement. Treatment arms: (1) probiotic supplement and diet-as-usual (probiotic group); (2) high-prebiotic diet and placebo supplement (prebiotic diet group); (3) probiotic supplement and high-prebiotic diet (synbiotic group); and (4) placebo supplement and diet-as-usual (placebo group). At baseline and 8-weeks, the Cogstate Brief Battery was administered, testing processing speed, attention, visual learning, and working memory. Data were analysed using Bayesian linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found weak evidence that the probiotic improved working memory (Cohen's <i>d</i> = -0.32, 95% CI: -0.67, 0.03; posterior probability [post. prob] of benefit: 96%). For the other treatments, there was little or no evidence of cognitive improvement. We found weak evidence that the prebiotic diet impaired processing speed (<i>d</i> = 0.25, 95% CI: -0.02, 0.51; post. prob of harm: 97%). There was little indication of a synergistic interaction between the probiotic and prebiotic diet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found suggestive evidence of a probiotic-induced improvement in working memory, and prebiotic-induced impairment in processing speed. However, the evidence remains inconclusive regarding any cognitive benefit or harm induced by the probiotic, prebiotic diet, or synbiotic treatments. Larger intervention studies are recommended, with inclusion of neuroimaging or electrophysiology measures.<b>Trial Registration:</b> Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000795392; registered 31 May 2017).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutritional Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutritional Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2024.2425570\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutritional Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2024.2425570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新的证据表明,针对肠道微生物群的干预措施可能会改善认知能力。作为 "肠道感觉 "试验的一部分,我们评估了富含益生菌的饮食干预、益生菌补充剂或两者的合成益生菌组合是否会改善人类认知:方法:对 118 名情绪低落且有可能改善饮食的成年人进行了为期 8 周的 2 × 2 因式随机对照试验。治疗组:(1)益生菌补充剂和正常饮食(益生菌组);(2)高益生饮食和安慰剂补充剂(益生饮食组);(3)益生菌补充剂和高益生饮食(合成益生菌组);以及(4)安慰剂补充剂和正常饮食(安慰剂组)。在基线和 8 周时,进行 Cogstate Brief Battery 测试,测试处理速度、注意力、视觉学习和工作记忆。数据采用贝叶斯线性回归法进行分析:我们发现,益生菌改善工作记忆的证据不足(Cohen's d = -0.32,95% CI:-0.67,0.03;获益的后验概率[post. prob]:96%)。其他治疗方法几乎没有改善认知能力的证据。我们发现,有微弱证据表明益生元饮食会损害处理速度(d = 0.25,95% CI:-0.02,0.51;损害的后验概率:97%)。几乎没有迹象表明益生菌和益生元饮食之间存在协同作用:我们发现了益生菌诱导工作记忆改善和益生元诱导处理速度受损的提示性证据。然而,关于益生菌、益生元饮食或合成益生菌治疗对认知的益处或害处,目前仍无定论。建议进行更大规模的干预研究,包括神经影像学或电生理学测量:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12617000795392;2017年5月31日注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of a prebiotic-rich diet and/or probiotic supplements on human cognition: secondary outcomes from the 'gut feelings' randomised controlled trial.

Background: Emerging evidence indicates that gut microbiota-targeted interventions may lead to improvements in cognition. We assessed whether a prebiotic-rich dietary intervention, probiotic supplement, or synbiotic combination of both would improve human cognition, as part of the 'Gut Feelings' trial.

Methods: An 8-week, 2 × 2 factorial randomised controlled trial was conducted on 118 adults with low mood and potential for dietary improvement. Treatment arms: (1) probiotic supplement and diet-as-usual (probiotic group); (2) high-prebiotic diet and placebo supplement (prebiotic diet group); (3) probiotic supplement and high-prebiotic diet (synbiotic group); and (4) placebo supplement and diet-as-usual (placebo group). At baseline and 8-weeks, the Cogstate Brief Battery was administered, testing processing speed, attention, visual learning, and working memory. Data were analysed using Bayesian linear regression.

Results: We found weak evidence that the probiotic improved working memory (Cohen's d = -0.32, 95% CI: -0.67, 0.03; posterior probability [post. prob] of benefit: 96%). For the other treatments, there was little or no evidence of cognitive improvement. We found weak evidence that the prebiotic diet impaired processing speed (d = 0.25, 95% CI: -0.02, 0.51; post. prob of harm: 97%). There was little indication of a synergistic interaction between the probiotic and prebiotic diet.

Conclusion: We found suggestive evidence of a probiotic-induced improvement in working memory, and prebiotic-induced impairment in processing speed. However, the evidence remains inconclusive regarding any cognitive benefit or harm induced by the probiotic, prebiotic diet, or synbiotic treatments. Larger intervention studies are recommended, with inclusion of neuroimaging or electrophysiology measures.Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000795392; registered 31 May 2017).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutritional Neuroscience
Nutritional Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
236
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutritional Neuroscience is an international, interdisciplinary broad-based, online journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the field of nutrition that relates to the central and peripheral nervous system. Studies may include the role of different components of normal diet (protein, carbohydrate, fat, moderate use of alcohol, etc.), dietary supplements (minerals, vitamins, hormones, herbs, etc.), and food additives (artificial flavours, colours, sweeteners, etc.) on neurochemistry, neurobiology, and behavioural biology of all vertebrate and invertebrate organisms. Ideally this journal will serve as a forum for neuroscientists, nutritionists, neurologists, psychiatrists, and those interested in preventive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信