Jessica L Sheehan, Ariel A Jordan, Kira L Newman, Laura A Johnson, Dala Eloubeidi, Shirley Cohen-Mekelburg, Jeffrey A Berinstein, Renuka Tipirneni, Peter D R Higgins
{"title":"社会弱势人群中炎性肠病患者接种疫苗的差异。","authors":"Jessica L Sheehan, Ariel A Jordan, Kira L Newman, Laura A Johnson, Dala Eloubeidi, Shirley Cohen-Mekelburg, Jeffrey A Berinstein, Renuka Tipirneni, Peter D R Higgins","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08733-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH) have a known impact on disparities in vaccination. Despite an increased risk for infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), SDOH and vaccination in this population have not been studied. Using census tract-level data from the Centers for Disease Control's social vulnerability index (SVI), we aimed to understand the relationship between SDOH and adherence to guideline-recommended vaccinations in patients with IBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort of patients with IBD was used to geocode patient addresses to their individual census tract and corresponding SVI and subthemes (Socioeconomic Status, Household Composition, Minority Status, and Housing/Transportation). We used separate multivariable logistic regressions to examine the relationship between SVI and vaccination against influenza, COVID-19, pneumococcal pneumonia, and herpes zoster.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,036 patients were included. Rates of vaccination varied across vaccine-types: influenza (57%), COVID-19 (65%), pneumococcal pneumonia (58%), and herpes zoster (11%). High social vulnerability was associated with lower odds of vaccination against influenza (OR 0.47, p < 0.001), COVID-19 (OR 0.54, p < 0.001), pneumonia (OR 0.73, p = 0.012), and herpes zoster (OR 0.39, p < 0.001). Within the SVI subthemes, Socioeconomic Status, Household Composition, and Minority Status were important factors associated with differences in vaccine uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher social vulnerability was associated with lower rates of vaccination across all vaccine types. Identifying these disparities in vaccination for socially vulnerable patients with IBD is the first step to reducing preventable infections and ensuring all patients receive high quality, equitable care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Vaccination Amongst Socially Vulnerable Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica L Sheehan, Ariel A Jordan, Kira L Newman, Laura A Johnson, Dala Eloubeidi, Shirley Cohen-Mekelburg, Jeffrey A Berinstein, Renuka Tipirneni, Peter D R Higgins\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-024-08733-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH) have a known impact on disparities in vaccination. Despite an increased risk for infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), SDOH and vaccination in this population have not been studied. Using census tract-level data from the Centers for Disease Control's social vulnerability index (SVI), we aimed to understand the relationship between SDOH and adherence to guideline-recommended vaccinations in patients with IBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort of patients with IBD was used to geocode patient addresses to their individual census tract and corresponding SVI and subthemes (Socioeconomic Status, Household Composition, Minority Status, and Housing/Transportation). We used separate multivariable logistic regressions to examine the relationship between SVI and vaccination against influenza, COVID-19, pneumococcal pneumonia, and herpes zoster.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,036 patients were included. Rates of vaccination varied across vaccine-types: influenza (57%), COVID-19 (65%), pneumococcal pneumonia (58%), and herpes zoster (11%). High social vulnerability was associated with lower odds of vaccination against influenza (OR 0.47, p < 0.001), COVID-19 (OR 0.54, p < 0.001), pneumonia (OR 0.73, p = 0.012), and herpes zoster (OR 0.39, p < 0.001). Within the SVI subthemes, Socioeconomic Status, Household Composition, and Minority Status were important factors associated with differences in vaccine uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher social vulnerability was associated with lower rates of vaccination across all vaccine types. Identifying these disparities in vaccination for socially vulnerable patients with IBD is the first step to reducing preventable infections and ensuring all patients receive high quality, equitable care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08733-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08733-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disparities in Vaccination Amongst Socially Vulnerable Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Introduction: Social determinants of health (SDOH) have a known impact on disparities in vaccination. Despite an increased risk for infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), SDOH and vaccination in this population have not been studied. Using census tract-level data from the Centers for Disease Control's social vulnerability index (SVI), we aimed to understand the relationship between SDOH and adherence to guideline-recommended vaccinations in patients with IBD.
Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort of patients with IBD was used to geocode patient addresses to their individual census tract and corresponding SVI and subthemes (Socioeconomic Status, Household Composition, Minority Status, and Housing/Transportation). We used separate multivariable logistic regressions to examine the relationship between SVI and vaccination against influenza, COVID-19, pneumococcal pneumonia, and herpes zoster.
Results: A total of 7,036 patients were included. Rates of vaccination varied across vaccine-types: influenza (57%), COVID-19 (65%), pneumococcal pneumonia (58%), and herpes zoster (11%). High social vulnerability was associated with lower odds of vaccination against influenza (OR 0.47, p < 0.001), COVID-19 (OR 0.54, p < 0.001), pneumonia (OR 0.73, p = 0.012), and herpes zoster (OR 0.39, p < 0.001). Within the SVI subthemes, Socioeconomic Status, Household Composition, and Minority Status were important factors associated with differences in vaccine uptake.
Conclusion: Higher social vulnerability was associated with lower rates of vaccination across all vaccine types. Identifying these disparities in vaccination for socially vulnerable patients with IBD is the first step to reducing preventable infections and ensuring all patients receive high quality, equitable care.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.