基于差分博弈的跨界流域双向生态补偿策略研究。

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hao Xu, Liuxin Chen, Qiongfang Li
{"title":"基于差分博弈的跨界流域双向生态补偿策略研究。","authors":"Hao Xu, Liuxin Chen, Qiongfang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Water pollution control in transboundary watersheds can improve the water environment quality, alleviate water resource conflicts, and is an important guarantee for achieving healthy and stable development of watersheds. Ecological compensation is an important measure to solve the problem of water pollution in transboundary watersheds and has been widely applied in China. We constructed differential game models for water pollution control in transboundary watersheds under four scenarios: (1) no ecological compensation scenario, (2) upstream one-way ecological compensation scenario, (3) downstream one-way ecological compensation scenario, and (4) upstream and downstream two-way ecological compensation scenario. We studied the optimal water pollution control strategies and ecological compensation strategies under different scenarios, and compared the results obtained under different scenarios to explore which scenario has better water pollution control and ecological compensation, as well as the applicable conditions for different one-way ecological compensation. The results indicate that both upstream and downstream one-way ecological compensation can promote water pollution control, and the optimal one-way ecological compensation should be determined based on the cost and benefit parameters of upstream and downstream water pollution control. The upstream and downstream two-way ecological compensation can reduce the pollutant reduction furthest and improve the social welfare extremely, making it the best ecological compensation. Finally, it is necessary to actively promote the formation of two-way ecological compensation in the upstream and downstream of transboundary watersheds to achieve long-term sustainable development of the watershed.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on two-way ecological compensation strategy for transboundary watershed based on differential game.\",\"authors\":\"Hao Xu, Liuxin Chen, Qiongfang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Water pollution control in transboundary watersheds can improve the water environment quality, alleviate water resource conflicts, and is an important guarantee for achieving healthy and stable development of watersheds. Ecological compensation is an important measure to solve the problem of water pollution in transboundary watersheds and has been widely applied in China. We constructed differential game models for water pollution control in transboundary watersheds under four scenarios: (1) no ecological compensation scenario, (2) upstream one-way ecological compensation scenario, (3) downstream one-way ecological compensation scenario, and (4) upstream and downstream two-way ecological compensation scenario. We studied the optimal water pollution control strategies and ecological compensation strategies under different scenarios, and compared the results obtained under different scenarios to explore which scenario has better water pollution control and ecological compensation, as well as the applicable conditions for different one-way ecological compensation. The results indicate that both upstream and downstream one-way ecological compensation can promote water pollution control, and the optimal one-way ecological compensation should be determined based on the cost and benefit parameters of upstream and downstream water pollution control. The upstream and downstream two-way ecological compensation can reduce the pollutant reduction furthest and improve the social welfare extremely, making it the best ecological compensation. Finally, it is necessary to actively promote the formation of two-way ecological compensation in the upstream and downstream of transboundary watersheds to achieve long-term sustainable development of the watershed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123314\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨界流域水污染治理可以改善水环境质量,缓解水资源矛盾,是实现流域健康稳定发展的重要保障。生态补偿是解决跨界流域水污染问题的重要措施,在我国已得到广泛应用。我们构建了四种情景下跨界流域水污染控制的微分博弈模型:(1)无生态补偿情景;(2)上游单向生态补偿情景;(3)下游单向生态补偿情景;(4)上下游双向生态补偿情景。我们研究了不同方案下的最优水污染控制策略和生态补偿策略,并对不同方案下的结果进行了比较,以探讨哪种方案具有更好的水污染控制和生态补偿效果,以及不同单向生态补偿的适用条件。结果表明,上下游单向生态补偿都能促进水污染控制,最优的单向生态补偿应根据上下游水污染控制的成本和效益参数来确定。而上下游双向生态补偿能最大幅度地减少污染物减排量,极大地改善社会福利,是最佳的生态补偿方式。最后,要积极推动跨界流域上下游双向生态补偿的形成,实现流域的长期可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on two-way ecological compensation strategy for transboundary watershed based on differential game.

Water pollution control in transboundary watersheds can improve the water environment quality, alleviate water resource conflicts, and is an important guarantee for achieving healthy and stable development of watersheds. Ecological compensation is an important measure to solve the problem of water pollution in transboundary watersheds and has been widely applied in China. We constructed differential game models for water pollution control in transboundary watersheds under four scenarios: (1) no ecological compensation scenario, (2) upstream one-way ecological compensation scenario, (3) downstream one-way ecological compensation scenario, and (4) upstream and downstream two-way ecological compensation scenario. We studied the optimal water pollution control strategies and ecological compensation strategies under different scenarios, and compared the results obtained under different scenarios to explore which scenario has better water pollution control and ecological compensation, as well as the applicable conditions for different one-way ecological compensation. The results indicate that both upstream and downstream one-way ecological compensation can promote water pollution control, and the optimal one-way ecological compensation should be determined based on the cost and benefit parameters of upstream and downstream water pollution control. The upstream and downstream two-way ecological compensation can reduce the pollutant reduction furthest and improve the social welfare extremely, making it the best ecological compensation. Finally, it is necessary to actively promote the formation of two-way ecological compensation in the upstream and downstream of transboundary watersheds to achieve long-term sustainable development of the watershed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信