使用微轴血流泵治疗老年心源性休克患者:危险吗?

IF 21.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Anika Klein, Rasmus P. Beske, Christian Hassager, Lisette O. Jensen, Hans Eiskjær, Norman Mangner, Axel Linke, Amin Polzin, P. Christian Schulze, Carsten Skurk, Peter Nordbeck, Peter Clemmensen, Vasileios Panoulas, Sebastian Zimmer, Andreas Schäfer, Nikos Werner, Thomas Engstøm, Lene Holmvang, Anders Junker, Henrik Schmidt, Jacob E. Møller
{"title":"使用微轴血流泵治疗老年心源性休克患者:危险吗?","authors":"Anika Klein, Rasmus P. Beske, Christian Hassager, Lisette O. Jensen, Hans Eiskjær, Norman Mangner, Axel Linke, Amin Polzin, P. Christian Schulze, Carsten Skurk, Peter Nordbeck, Peter Clemmensen, Vasileios Panoulas, Sebastian Zimmer, Andreas Schäfer, Nikos Werner, Thomas Engstøm, Lene Holmvang, Anders Junker, Henrik Schmidt, Jacob E. Møller","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Whether age impacts the recently demonstrated survival benefit of microaxial flow pump (mAFP) treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) is unknown.<h3>Objectives</h3>The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of age on mortality and complication rates in patients with STEMI-related CS randomized to standard care or mAFP on top of standard care.<h3>Methods</h3>This is a secondary analysis of the Danish-German Cardiogenic Shock (DanGer Shock) trial, an international, multicenter, open-label trial, in which 355 adult patients with STEMI-related CS were randomized to receive a mAFP (Impella CP) plus standard care or standard care alone. The primary outcome of 180-day all-cause mortality is analysed according to age and intervention.<h3>Results</h3>From lowest to highest age quartile, the median ages (range) were: 54 (31-59), 65 (60-69), 73 (70-76), and 81 (77-92) years. There were no differences in blood pressure, lactate level, left ventricular ejection fraction or shock severity at randomization across age groups.Mortality increased from lowest to highest quartile (31%, 47%, 61%, and 73%, respectively; log-rank p&lt;0.001), with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) for death at 180 days of 7.85 (95% CI, 3.37-19.2; p&lt;0.001) in the highest quartile compared to the lowest. The predicted risk of mortality was higher in the standard-care group until approximately 77 years, after which the predicted risk became higher in the mAFP group (p-interaction=0.2). In patients younger than 77 years, a reduced 180-day mortality was observed in patients randomized to the mAFP (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.73; p=0.001), opposed to patients aged 77 years or older (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.57–4.08; p=0.40), p=0.028 for interaction. Complications were more frequent in the mAFP group, but there were no apparent differences in incidence of complications across all ages.<h3>Conclusions</h3>This exploratory secondary analysis of the DanGer Shock trial demonstrates that elderly patients with STEMI-related CS experience high mortality and may not attain the same benefit from routine treatment with a mAFP as younger patients. Incorporating age as a factor in patient selection may enhance the overall benefit of this therapy. (DanGer Shock, NCT01633502)","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treating Older Patients in Cardiogenic Shock with a Microaxial Flow Pump: Is it DANGERous?\",\"authors\":\"Anika Klein, Rasmus P. Beske, Christian Hassager, Lisette O. Jensen, Hans Eiskjær, Norman Mangner, Axel Linke, Amin Polzin, P. Christian Schulze, Carsten Skurk, Peter Nordbeck, Peter Clemmensen, Vasileios Panoulas, Sebastian Zimmer, Andreas Schäfer, Nikos Werner, Thomas Engstøm, Lene Holmvang, Anders Junker, Henrik Schmidt, Jacob E. Møller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>Whether age impacts the recently demonstrated survival benefit of microaxial flow pump (mAFP) treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) is unknown.<h3>Objectives</h3>The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of age on mortality and complication rates in patients with STEMI-related CS randomized to standard care or mAFP on top of standard care.<h3>Methods</h3>This is a secondary analysis of the Danish-German Cardiogenic Shock (DanGer Shock) trial, an international, multicenter, open-label trial, in which 355 adult patients with STEMI-related CS were randomized to receive a mAFP (Impella CP) plus standard care or standard care alone. The primary outcome of 180-day all-cause mortality is analysed according to age and intervention.<h3>Results</h3>From lowest to highest age quartile, the median ages (range) were: 54 (31-59), 65 (60-69), 73 (70-76), and 81 (77-92) years. There were no differences in blood pressure, lactate level, left ventricular ejection fraction or shock severity at randomization across age groups.Mortality increased from lowest to highest quartile (31%, 47%, 61%, and 73%, respectively; log-rank p&lt;0.001), with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) for death at 180 days of 7.85 (95% CI, 3.37-19.2; p&lt;0.001) in the highest quartile compared to the lowest. The predicted risk of mortality was higher in the standard-care group until approximately 77 years, after which the predicted risk became higher in the mAFP group (p-interaction=0.2). In patients younger than 77 years, a reduced 180-day mortality was observed in patients randomized to the mAFP (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.73; p=0.001), opposed to patients aged 77 years or older (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.57–4.08; p=0.40), p=0.028 for interaction. Complications were more frequent in the mAFP group, but there were no apparent differences in incidence of complications across all ages.<h3>Conclusions</h3>This exploratory secondary analysis of the DanGer Shock trial demonstrates that elderly patients with STEMI-related CS experience high mortality and may not attain the same benefit from routine treatment with a mAFP as younger patients. Incorporating age as a factor in patient selection may enhance the overall benefit of this therapy. (DanGer Shock, NCT01633502)\",\"PeriodicalId\":17187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景微轴血流泵(mAFP)治疗对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和心源性休克(CS)患者的生存获益最近已得到证实,但年龄是否会对这种获益产生影响尚不清楚。方法这是丹麦-德国心源性休克(DanGer Shock)试验的二次分析,该试验是一项国际多中心开放标签试验,355 名 STEMI 相关 CS 成人患者被随机分配接受 mAFP(Impella CP)加标准护理或单独标准护理。根据年龄和干预措施对 180 天全因死亡率这一主要结果进行了分析:54(31-59)、65(60-69)、73(70-76)和 81(77-92)岁。死亡率从最低四分位数到最高四分位数依次增加(分别为 31%、47%、61% 和 73%;对数秩 p<0.001),与最低四分位数相比,最高四分位数的 180 天死亡调整后几率比 (OR) 为 7.85(95% CI,3.37-19.2;p<0.001)。在 77 岁左右之前,标准护理组的预测死亡风险较高,而在 77 岁之后,mAFP 组的预测死亡风险较高(p-交互作用=0.2)。在 77 岁以下的患者中,随机接受 mAFP 治疗的患者 180 天死亡率降低(OR,0.45;95% CI,0.28-0.73;p=0.001),而 77 岁或以上的患者 180 天死亡率降低(OR,1.52;95% CI,0.57-4.08;p=0.40),交互作用 p=0.028。结论这项DanGer休克试验的探索性二次分析表明,STEMI相关CS老年患者死亡率较高,可能无法像年轻患者一样从mAFP常规治疗中获益。将年龄作为选择患者的一个因素可能会提高这种疗法的整体效益。(DanGer Shock,NCT01633502)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treating Older Patients in Cardiogenic Shock with a Microaxial Flow Pump: Is it DANGERous?

Background

Whether age impacts the recently demonstrated survival benefit of microaxial flow pump (mAFP) treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) is unknown.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of age on mortality and complication rates in patients with STEMI-related CS randomized to standard care or mAFP on top of standard care.

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of the Danish-German Cardiogenic Shock (DanGer Shock) trial, an international, multicenter, open-label trial, in which 355 adult patients with STEMI-related CS were randomized to receive a mAFP (Impella CP) plus standard care or standard care alone. The primary outcome of 180-day all-cause mortality is analysed according to age and intervention.

Results

From lowest to highest age quartile, the median ages (range) were: 54 (31-59), 65 (60-69), 73 (70-76), and 81 (77-92) years. There were no differences in blood pressure, lactate level, left ventricular ejection fraction or shock severity at randomization across age groups.Mortality increased from lowest to highest quartile (31%, 47%, 61%, and 73%, respectively; log-rank p<0.001), with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) for death at 180 days of 7.85 (95% CI, 3.37-19.2; p<0.001) in the highest quartile compared to the lowest. The predicted risk of mortality was higher in the standard-care group until approximately 77 years, after which the predicted risk became higher in the mAFP group (p-interaction=0.2). In patients younger than 77 years, a reduced 180-day mortality was observed in patients randomized to the mAFP (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.73; p=0.001), opposed to patients aged 77 years or older (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.57–4.08; p=0.40), p=0.028 for interaction. Complications were more frequent in the mAFP group, but there were no apparent differences in incidence of complications across all ages.

Conclusions

This exploratory secondary analysis of the DanGer Shock trial demonstrates that elderly patients with STEMI-related CS experience high mortality and may not attain the same benefit from routine treatment with a mAFP as younger patients. Incorporating age as a factor in patient selection may enhance the overall benefit of this therapy. (DanGer Shock, NCT01633502)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
42.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
5097
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints. Content Profile: -Original Investigations -JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews -JACC Review Topics of the Week -Guidelines & Clinical Documents -JACC Guideline Comparisons -JACC Scientific Expert Panels -Cardiovascular Medicine & Society -Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation) -Research Letters -Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages -Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信