绩效管理、指标质量和信任:来自医疗机构的调查证据

Hilco J. van Elten, Berend van der Kolk
{"title":"绩效管理、指标质量和信任:来自医疗机构的调查证据","authors":"Hilco J. van Elten, Berend van der Kolk","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the impact of performance management (PM) and metric quality on trust and performance in healthcare organizations. Prior research found that PM can elicit feelings of distrust, as healthcare professionals can perceive control as curbing their autonomy. We examine whether the quality of metrics (i.e., their accuracy, sensitivity, and verifiability) can help PM to enhance interpersonal trust in healthcare settings. We mobilize self-determination theory (SDT) and argue that PM using high-quality metrics can address managers' needs for competence and autonomy, which in turn can impact interpersonal trust and unit performance. Using survey data from 152 middle managers in healthcare settings, we find that metric quality moderates the relationship between PM and interpersonal trust, which is subsequently positively linked with unit performance. Also, we find that action control and cultural control are positively associated with interpersonal trust. We complement literature on the control-trust nexus by highlighting the importance of metric quality, and by showing which forms of control can be instrumental in creating a high-trust work environment.","PeriodicalId":501001,"journal":{"name":"The British Accounting Review","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance management, metric quality, and trust: Survey evidence from healthcare organizations\",\"authors\":\"Hilco J. van Elten, Berend van der Kolk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine the impact of performance management (PM) and metric quality on trust and performance in healthcare organizations. Prior research found that PM can elicit feelings of distrust, as healthcare professionals can perceive control as curbing their autonomy. We examine whether the quality of metrics (i.e., their accuracy, sensitivity, and verifiability) can help PM to enhance interpersonal trust in healthcare settings. We mobilize self-determination theory (SDT) and argue that PM using high-quality metrics can address managers' needs for competence and autonomy, which in turn can impact interpersonal trust and unit performance. Using survey data from 152 middle managers in healthcare settings, we find that metric quality moderates the relationship between PM and interpersonal trust, which is subsequently positively linked with unit performance. Also, we find that action control and cultural control are positively associated with interpersonal trust. We complement literature on the control-trust nexus by highlighting the importance of metric quality, and by showing which forms of control can be instrumental in creating a high-trust work environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British Accounting Review\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British Accounting Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了绩效管理(PM)和指标质量对医疗机构信任和绩效的影响。先前的研究发现,绩效管理会引发不信任感,因为医疗保健专业人员会认为控制会限制他们的自主权。我们研究了衡量标准的质量(即其准确性、敏感性和可验证性)是否有助于项目管理增强医疗机构中的人际信任。我们运用自我决定理论(SDT),认为使用高质量衡量标准的项目管理可以满足管理人员对能力和自主权的需求,进而影响人际信任和单位绩效。通过对医疗机构 152 名中层管理人员的调查数据,我们发现衡量标准的质量调节了项目管理与人际信任之间的关系,而人际信任又与单位绩效正相关。此外,我们还发现行动控制和文化控制与人际信任正相关。我们对有关控制与信任关系的文献进行了补充,强调了度量衡质量的重要性,并说明了哪些形式的控制有助于创造高信任度的工作环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance management, metric quality, and trust: Survey evidence from healthcare organizations
We examine the impact of performance management (PM) and metric quality on trust and performance in healthcare organizations. Prior research found that PM can elicit feelings of distrust, as healthcare professionals can perceive control as curbing their autonomy. We examine whether the quality of metrics (i.e., their accuracy, sensitivity, and verifiability) can help PM to enhance interpersonal trust in healthcare settings. We mobilize self-determination theory (SDT) and argue that PM using high-quality metrics can address managers' needs for competence and autonomy, which in turn can impact interpersonal trust and unit performance. Using survey data from 152 middle managers in healthcare settings, we find that metric quality moderates the relationship between PM and interpersonal trust, which is subsequently positively linked with unit performance. Also, we find that action control and cultural control are positively associated with interpersonal trust. We complement literature on the control-trust nexus by highlighting the importance of metric quality, and by showing which forms of control can be instrumental in creating a high-trust work environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信