{"title":"极性编码连续取消翻转解码的灵活重启机制","authors":"Xue Xiyue;He Meilin;Guo Rui","doi":"10.1109/LCOMM.2024.3465393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polar codes can achieve near-capacity performance under low-complexity successive cancellation (SC) decoding. However, short to medium-length block codes exhibit insufficient error-correction performance with the SC algorithm, which limits their practical applications. Although the successive cancellation flip (SCF) decoder improves SC performance, its variable execution time poses challenges in certain scenarios. The simplified restart mechanism (SRM) reduces the execution time of SCF decoders through conditional restart of the additional trials from the second half of the codeword. However, regardless of the position of the flipped bit on the RHS, additional decoding trials can only start from a fixed restart position, which limits efficiency improvements. This letter proposes a flexible restart mechanism (FRM), introducing multiple optional restart positions to further optimize the simplified restart mechanism, reducing both execution time and its variability. In simulations, we used P(1024, 128) and P(2048, 256) polar codes to compare the performance of SCF decoders embedding with FRM and SRM. The results indicate that, compared to the SCF decoder, the SCF decoder with FRM reduces average execution time, average additional execution time, execution time variance, and median additional execution time by 14.95%, 63.42%, 86.55%, and 58.20%, respectively. Compared to the SCF decoder embedding with SRM, FRM achieves improvements in these metrics by 5.15%, 23.14%, 20.24%, and 29.71%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":13197,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Communications Letters","volume":"28 11","pages":"2459-2463"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexible Restart Mechanism for Successive Cancellation Flip Decoding of Polar Codes\",\"authors\":\"Xue Xiyue;He Meilin;Guo Rui\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LCOMM.2024.3465393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Polar codes can achieve near-capacity performance under low-complexity successive cancellation (SC) decoding. However, short to medium-length block codes exhibit insufficient error-correction performance with the SC algorithm, which limits their practical applications. Although the successive cancellation flip (SCF) decoder improves SC performance, its variable execution time poses challenges in certain scenarios. The simplified restart mechanism (SRM) reduces the execution time of SCF decoders through conditional restart of the additional trials from the second half of the codeword. However, regardless of the position of the flipped bit on the RHS, additional decoding trials can only start from a fixed restart position, which limits efficiency improvements. This letter proposes a flexible restart mechanism (FRM), introducing multiple optional restart positions to further optimize the simplified restart mechanism, reducing both execution time and its variability. In simulations, we used P(1024, 128) and P(2048, 256) polar codes to compare the performance of SCF decoders embedding with FRM and SRM. The results indicate that, compared to the SCF decoder, the SCF decoder with FRM reduces average execution time, average additional execution time, execution time variance, and median additional execution time by 14.95%, 63.42%, 86.55%, and 58.20%, respectively. Compared to the SCF decoder embedding with SRM, FRM achieves improvements in these metrics by 5.15%, 23.14%, 20.24%, and 29.71%, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Communications Letters\",\"volume\":\"28 11\",\"pages\":\"2459-2463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Communications Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10693474/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TELECOMMUNICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Communications Letters","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10693474/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TELECOMMUNICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flexible Restart Mechanism for Successive Cancellation Flip Decoding of Polar Codes
Polar codes can achieve near-capacity performance under low-complexity successive cancellation (SC) decoding. However, short to medium-length block codes exhibit insufficient error-correction performance with the SC algorithm, which limits their practical applications. Although the successive cancellation flip (SCF) decoder improves SC performance, its variable execution time poses challenges in certain scenarios. The simplified restart mechanism (SRM) reduces the execution time of SCF decoders through conditional restart of the additional trials from the second half of the codeword. However, regardless of the position of the flipped bit on the RHS, additional decoding trials can only start from a fixed restart position, which limits efficiency improvements. This letter proposes a flexible restart mechanism (FRM), introducing multiple optional restart positions to further optimize the simplified restart mechanism, reducing both execution time and its variability. In simulations, we used P(1024, 128) and P(2048, 256) polar codes to compare the performance of SCF decoders embedding with FRM and SRM. The results indicate that, compared to the SCF decoder, the SCF decoder with FRM reduces average execution time, average additional execution time, execution time variance, and median additional execution time by 14.95%, 63.42%, 86.55%, and 58.20%, respectively. Compared to the SCF decoder embedding with SRM, FRM achieves improvements in these metrics by 5.15%, 23.14%, 20.24%, and 29.71%, respectively.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Communications Letters publishes short papers in a rapid publication cycle on advances in the state-of-the-art of communication over different media and channels including wire, underground, waveguide, optical fiber, and storage channels. Both theoretical contributions (including new techniques, concepts, and analyses) and practical contributions (including system experiments and prototypes, and new applications) are encouraged. This journal focuses on the physical layer and the link layer of communication systems.