继发性下肢淋巴水肿的三维非对比磁共振淋巴造影分期系统

Lymphology Pub Date : 2024-01-01
T Kageyama, Y Shiko, Y Kawasaki, T Miyazaki, H Sakai, R Tsukuura, T Yamamoto
{"title":"继发性下肢淋巴水肿的三维非对比磁共振淋巴造影分期系统","authors":"T Kageyama, Y Shiko, Y Kawasaki, T Miyazaki, H Sakai, R Tsukuura, T Yamamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-contrast magnetic resonance lymphography (NMRL) has been reported to be efficient for the evaluation of lymphedema. However, its characteristic findings and grading system are yet fully clarified. We retrospectively examined 48 patients with secondary lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) who underwent NMRL and indocyanine green lymphography (ICG-L). The lower extremity was divided into 5 areas for NMRL evaluation, and the prevalence of characteristic NMRL findings (Mist, Spray, and Inky) and the 3D NMRL stage that we proposed were compared according to the ICG-L stage. All characteristic NMRL findings increased in prevalence with the progression of the ICG-L stage (Mist, Spray, and Inky: P < 0.001, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively) Pre-dominant findings in each segment changed significantly from Mist in the ICG-L stage 0-Ⅱ, to the Spray in ICG-L stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ, to the Inky in ICG-L stage Ⅴ (P < 0.001). 3D NMRL stage significantly advanced with the progression of the ICG-L stage (rs = 0.72; P < 0.001). We believe this severity grading system is useful for efficient evaluation of fluid accumulation in LEL patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94343,"journal":{"name":"Lymphology","volume":"57 2","pages":"59-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Staging System of Three-Dimensional Non-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphography in Secondary Lower Extremity Lymphedema.\",\"authors\":\"T Kageyama, Y Shiko, Y Kawasaki, T Miyazaki, H Sakai, R Tsukuura, T Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Non-contrast magnetic resonance lymphography (NMRL) has been reported to be efficient for the evaluation of lymphedema. However, its characteristic findings and grading system are yet fully clarified. We retrospectively examined 48 patients with secondary lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) who underwent NMRL and indocyanine green lymphography (ICG-L). The lower extremity was divided into 5 areas for NMRL evaluation, and the prevalence of characteristic NMRL findings (Mist, Spray, and Inky) and the 3D NMRL stage that we proposed were compared according to the ICG-L stage. All characteristic NMRL findings increased in prevalence with the progression of the ICG-L stage (Mist, Spray, and Inky: P < 0.001, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively) Pre-dominant findings in each segment changed significantly from Mist in the ICG-L stage 0-Ⅱ, to the Spray in ICG-L stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ, to the Inky in ICG-L stage Ⅴ (P < 0.001). 3D NMRL stage significantly advanced with the progression of the ICG-L stage (rs = 0.72; P < 0.001). We believe this severity grading system is useful for efficient evaluation of fluid accumulation in LEL patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lymphology\",\"volume\":\"57 2\",\"pages\":\"59-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lymphology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lymphology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报道,非对比磁共振淋巴造影(NMRL)可有效评估淋巴水肿。然而,其特征性结果和分级系统尚未完全明确。我们对 48 例继发性下肢淋巴水肿(LEL)患者进行了回顾性研究,他们都接受了 NMRL 和吲哚青绿淋巴造影(ICG-L)检查。将下肢分为 5 个区域进行 NMRL 评估,并根据 ICG-L 分期比较了特征性 NMRL 结果(雾状、喷射状和墨状)的发生率和我们提出的 3D NMRL 分期。随着 ICG-L 分期的进展,所有特征性 NMRL 结果的患病率均有所上升(雾状、喷雾状和墨色:P 分别<0.001、<0.001 和<0.001),各区段的前主导结果均发生了显著变化,从 ICG-L 0-Ⅱ 期的雾状,到 ICG-L Ⅲ-Ⅳ 期的喷雾状,再到 ICG-L Ⅴ 期的墨色(P <0.001)。3D NMRL 阶段随着 ICG-L 阶段的进展而明显提前(rs = 0.72;P <0.001)。我们认为该严重程度分级系统有助于有效评估 LEL 患者的积液情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Staging System of Three-Dimensional Non-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphography in Secondary Lower Extremity Lymphedema.

Non-contrast magnetic resonance lymphography (NMRL) has been reported to be efficient for the evaluation of lymphedema. However, its characteristic findings and grading system are yet fully clarified. We retrospectively examined 48 patients with secondary lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) who underwent NMRL and indocyanine green lymphography (ICG-L). The lower extremity was divided into 5 areas for NMRL evaluation, and the prevalence of characteristic NMRL findings (Mist, Spray, and Inky) and the 3D NMRL stage that we proposed were compared according to the ICG-L stage. All characteristic NMRL findings increased in prevalence with the progression of the ICG-L stage (Mist, Spray, and Inky: P < 0.001, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively) Pre-dominant findings in each segment changed significantly from Mist in the ICG-L stage 0-Ⅱ, to the Spray in ICG-L stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ, to the Inky in ICG-L stage Ⅴ (P < 0.001). 3D NMRL stage significantly advanced with the progression of the ICG-L stage (rs = 0.72; P < 0.001). We believe this severity grading system is useful for efficient evaluation of fluid accumulation in LEL patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信