使用电子健康记录对心血管疾病住院患者进行人工智能(AI)驱动的虚弱预测。

Circulation reports Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0112
Masashi Yamashita, Kentaro Kamiya, Kazuki Hotta, Anna Kubota, Kenji Sato, Emi Maekawa, Hiroaki Miyata, Junya Ako
{"title":"使用电子健康记录对心血管疾病住院患者进行人工智能(AI)驱动的虚弱预测。","authors":"Masashi Yamashita, Kentaro Kamiya, Kazuki Hotta, Anna Kubota, Kenji Sato, Emi Maekawa, Hiroaki Miyata, Junya Ako","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to create a deep learning model for predicting phenotypic physical frailty from electronic medical record information in patients with cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This single-center retrospective study enrolled patients who could be assessed for physical frailty according to cardiovascular health study criteria (25.5% [691/2,705] of the patients were frail). Patients were randomly separated for training (Train set: 80%) and validation (Test set: 20%) of the deep learning model. Multiple models were created using LightGBM, random forest, and logistic regression for deep learning, and their predictive abilities were compared. The LightGBM model had the highest accuracy (in a Test set: F1 score 0.561; accuracy 0.726; area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics [AUC] 0.804). These results using only commonly used blood biochemistry test indices (in a Test set: F1 score 0.551; accuracy 0.721; AUC 0.793) were similar. The created models were consistently and strongly associated with physical functions at hospital discharge, all-cause death, and heart failure-related readmission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep learning models derived from large sample sizes of phenotypic physical frailty have shown good accuracy and consistent associations with prognosis and physical functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":"6 11","pages":"495-504"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Frailty Prediction Using Electronic Health Records in Hospitalized Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Masashi Yamashita, Kentaro Kamiya, Kazuki Hotta, Anna Kubota, Kenji Sato, Emi Maekawa, Hiroaki Miyata, Junya Ako\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to create a deep learning model for predicting phenotypic physical frailty from electronic medical record information in patients with cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This single-center retrospective study enrolled patients who could be assessed for physical frailty according to cardiovascular health study criteria (25.5% [691/2,705] of the patients were frail). Patients were randomly separated for training (Train set: 80%) and validation (Test set: 20%) of the deep learning model. Multiple models were created using LightGBM, random forest, and logistic regression for deep learning, and their predictive abilities were compared. The LightGBM model had the highest accuracy (in a Test set: F1 score 0.561; accuracy 0.726; area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics [AUC] 0.804). These results using only commonly used blood biochemistry test indices (in a Test set: F1 score 0.551; accuracy 0.721; AUC 0.793) were similar. The created models were consistently and strongly associated with physical functions at hospital discharge, all-cause death, and heart failure-related readmission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep learning models derived from large sample sizes of phenotypic physical frailty have shown good accuracy and consistent associations with prognosis and physical functions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation reports\",\"volume\":\"6 11\",\"pages\":\"495-504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在创建一个深度学习模型,从心血管疾病患者的电子病历信息中预测表型体质虚弱:这项单中心回顾性研究招募了根据心血管健康研究标准可评估身体虚弱的患者(25.5% [691/2,705] 的患者身体虚弱)。患者被随机分开进行深度学习模型的训练(训练集:80%)和验证(测试集:20%)。利用深度学习的 LightGBM、随机森林和逻辑回归创建了多个模型,并对其预测能力进行了比较。LightGBM 模型的准确率最高(在测试集中:F1 分数为 0.561;准确率为 0.726;接收者操作特征曲线下面积 [AUC] 为 0.804)。仅使用常用的血液生化检验指数(在测试集中:F1 得分为 0.551;准确率为 0.721;AUC 为 0.793)得出的结果也类似。创建的模型与出院时的身体机能、全因死亡和心衰相关的再入院有着一致且紧密的联系:从表型体质虚弱的大量样本中得出的深度学习模型显示出良好的准确性以及与预后和身体功能的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Frailty Prediction Using Electronic Health Records in Hospitalized Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.

Background: This study aimed to create a deep learning model for predicting phenotypic physical frailty from electronic medical record information in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Methods and results: This single-center retrospective study enrolled patients who could be assessed for physical frailty according to cardiovascular health study criteria (25.5% [691/2,705] of the patients were frail). Patients were randomly separated for training (Train set: 80%) and validation (Test set: 20%) of the deep learning model. Multiple models were created using LightGBM, random forest, and logistic regression for deep learning, and their predictive abilities were compared. The LightGBM model had the highest accuracy (in a Test set: F1 score 0.561; accuracy 0.726; area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics [AUC] 0.804). These results using only commonly used blood biochemistry test indices (in a Test set: F1 score 0.551; accuracy 0.721; AUC 0.793) were similar. The created models were consistently and strongly associated with physical functions at hospital discharge, all-cause death, and heart failure-related readmission.

Conclusions: Deep learning models derived from large sample sizes of phenotypic physical frailty have shown good accuracy and consistent associations with prognosis and physical functions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信