异丙酚与七氟醚对儿童 Moyamoya 病脑氧饱和度的影响。近红外光谱研究。

J R Seshan, I Kapoor, H Prabhakar, C Mahajan
{"title":"异丙酚与七氟醚对儿童 Moyamoya 病脑氧饱和度的影响。近红外光谱研究。","authors":"J R Seshan, I Kapoor, H Prabhakar, C Mahajan","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2024.101630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Anaesthesia during surgery for moyamoya disease (MMD) has different effects on cerebral physiology. Both sevoflurane and propofol have cerebral protective effects, albeit with different mechanisms. We used near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to observe the effect of sevoflurane and propofol on rSO<sub>2</sub> in paediatric patients undergoing MMD surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included paediatric patients ASA grade I aged between 1 and 18 years undergoing surgery for MMD over a period of 1 year (from 1 April 2018 to 1 April 2019). Patients were randomized to 2 groups: Group S (sevoflurane) and Group P (propofol). NIRS values were recorded at 5 time points: T1 (baseline) T2 (after preoxygenation), T3 (after induction), T4 (end of surgery), T5 (after extubation). One-way ANOVA was used for intra-group comparisons and two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction were used for inter-group comparisons. P value <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients were included in the study. The average age was 10.5 ± 4.3 years. The mean baseline rSO<sub>2</sub> was 78.35 ± 10.58 and 77.95 ± 8.81 in the right and left hemispheres, respectively. In both groups, rSO<sub>2</sub> values increased between baseline and anaesthesia induction and fell slightly at the end of surgery. The inter-group analysis showed no statistically significant change between rSO<sub>2</sub> values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both sevoflurane and propofol maintain adequate rSO<sub>2</sub> levels in children undergoing surgery for MMD.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>CTRI/2018/04/013229 registered on 12.04.2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":" ","pages":"101630"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of propofol versus sevoflurane on cerebral oxygenation in childhood Moyamoya disease. A near infrared spectroscopy study.\",\"authors\":\"J R Seshan, I Kapoor, H Prabhakar, C Mahajan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.redare.2024.101630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Anaesthesia during surgery for moyamoya disease (MMD) has different effects on cerebral physiology. Both sevoflurane and propofol have cerebral protective effects, albeit with different mechanisms. We used near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to observe the effect of sevoflurane and propofol on rSO<sub>2</sub> in paediatric patients undergoing MMD surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included paediatric patients ASA grade I aged between 1 and 18 years undergoing surgery for MMD over a period of 1 year (from 1 April 2018 to 1 April 2019). Patients were randomized to 2 groups: Group S (sevoflurane) and Group P (propofol). NIRS values were recorded at 5 time points: T1 (baseline) T2 (after preoxygenation), T3 (after induction), T4 (end of surgery), T5 (after extubation). One-way ANOVA was used for intra-group comparisons and two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction were used for inter-group comparisons. P value <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients were included in the study. The average age was 10.5 ± 4.3 years. The mean baseline rSO<sub>2</sub> was 78.35 ± 10.58 and 77.95 ± 8.81 in the right and left hemispheres, respectively. In both groups, rSO<sub>2</sub> values increased between baseline and anaesthesia induction and fell slightly at the end of surgery. The inter-group analysis showed no statistically significant change between rSO<sub>2</sub> values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both sevoflurane and propofol maintain adequate rSO<sub>2</sub> levels in children undergoing surgery for MMD.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>CTRI/2018/04/013229 registered on 12.04.2018.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2024.101630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2024.101630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和目的:莫亚莫亚病(MMD)手术中的麻醉对大脑生理有不同的影响。七氟醚和丙泊酚都有保护大脑的作用,尽管机制不同。我们使用近红外光谱(NIRS)观察了七氟醚和异丙酚对接受MMD手术的儿科患者rSO2的影响:我们纳入了 1 至 18 岁接受 MMD 手术的 ASA I 级儿科患者,为期 1 年(从 2018 年 4 月 1 日至 2019 年 4 月 1 日)。患者被随机分为 2 组:S组(七氟烷)和P组(异丙酚)。在 5 个时间点记录 NIRS 值:T1(基线)、T2(预吸氧后)、T3(诱导后)、T4(手术结束)、T5(拔管后)。组内比较采用单因素方差分析,组间比较采用带 Bonferroni 校正的双因素重复测量方差分析。P 值 结果:本研究共纳入 20 名患者。平均年龄为 10.5 ± 4.3 岁。右半球和左半球的基线 rSO2 平均值分别为 78.35 ± 10.58 和 77.95 ± 8.81。两组患者的 rSO2 值在基线和麻醉诱导期间均有所上升,在手术结束时略有下降。组间分析显示,两组的rSO2值没有统计学意义上的显著变化:结论:七氟烷和异丙酚都能在接受MMD手术的儿童中维持足够的rSO2水平:CTRI/2018/04/013229注册于2018年4月12日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of propofol versus sevoflurane on cerebral oxygenation in childhood Moyamoya disease. A near infrared spectroscopy study.

Introduction and objectives: Anaesthesia during surgery for moyamoya disease (MMD) has different effects on cerebral physiology. Both sevoflurane and propofol have cerebral protective effects, albeit with different mechanisms. We used near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to observe the effect of sevoflurane and propofol on rSO2 in paediatric patients undergoing MMD surgery.

Materials and methods: We included paediatric patients ASA grade I aged between 1 and 18 years undergoing surgery for MMD over a period of 1 year (from 1 April 2018 to 1 April 2019). Patients were randomized to 2 groups: Group S (sevoflurane) and Group P (propofol). NIRS values were recorded at 5 time points: T1 (baseline) T2 (after preoxygenation), T3 (after induction), T4 (end of surgery), T5 (after extubation). One-way ANOVA was used for intra-group comparisons and two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction were used for inter-group comparisons. P value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: A total of 20 patients were included in the study. The average age was 10.5 ± 4.3 years. The mean baseline rSO2 was 78.35 ± 10.58 and 77.95 ± 8.81 in the right and left hemispheres, respectively. In both groups, rSO2 values increased between baseline and anaesthesia induction and fell slightly at the end of surgery. The inter-group analysis showed no statistically significant change between rSO2 values.

Conclusion: Both sevoflurane and propofol maintain adequate rSO2 levels in children undergoing surgery for MMD.

Clinical trial registration number: CTRI/2018/04/013229 registered on 12.04.2018.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信