Mike Wenzel, Florestan Koll, Benedikt Hoeh, Clara Humke, Carolin Siech, Nicolai Mader, Amir Sabet, Daniel Groener, Thomas Steuber, Markus Graefen, Tobias Maurer, Christian Brandts, Severine Banek, Felix K H Chun, Philipp Mandel
{"title":"卡巴齐他赛与 177Lu-PSMA 放射性药物治疗转移性钙化抗性前列腺癌的真实世界比较。","authors":"Mike Wenzel, Florestan Koll, Benedikt Hoeh, Clara Humke, Carolin Siech, Nicolai Mader, Amir Sabet, Daniel Groener, Thomas Steuber, Markus Graefen, Tobias Maurer, Christian Brandts, Severine Banek, Felix K H Chun, Philipp Mandel","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><sup>177</sup>Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan prostate-specific membrane antigen (<sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA) therapy is under current scientific investigation and aims to become established in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, real-world evidence in treatment comparison is scant. <b>Methods:</b> We relied on the FRAMCAP database and compared cabazitaxel versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA therapy in mCRPC patients regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Sensitivity analyses addressed second- to fourth-line mCRPC treatment to approximate current phase III patient selection criteria. <b>Results:</b> Of 373 patients, 14% received cabazitaxel, 65% received <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA, and 21% received both. Patients undergoing <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA therapy were significantly older than cabazitaxel patients (median, 72 y vs. 66 y; <i>P</i> < 0.01), and a higher proportion had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 2 or more (12% vs. 5.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.1). Rates of a prostate-specific antigen decline of at least 50% were 32% versus 0% for <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus cabazitaxel. In outcome analyses, significant superior median PFS was observed for <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus cabazitaxel (13.4 mo vs. 7.1 mo, <i>P</i> < 0.001), even after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.38; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Regarding OS, rates also significantly differed, with median OS of 14.7 mo versus 16.5 mo versus 29.6 mo for cabazitaxel versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus both treatments (<i>P</i> < 0.01). In sensitivity analyses of second- to fourth-line mCRPC treatment, PFS rates and median OS rates for cabazitaxel versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus both therapies qualitatively remained the same as for the entire cohort. <b>Conclusion:</b> In a real-world setting, <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA provides significantly better PFS and qualitatively better OS rates than does cabazitaxel chemotherapy and should therefore be considered a valuable treatment option for advanced mCRPC patients according to the European Medicines Agency approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":94099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Comparison of Cabazitaxel Versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Mike Wenzel, Florestan Koll, Benedikt Hoeh, Clara Humke, Carolin Siech, Nicolai Mader, Amir Sabet, Daniel Groener, Thomas Steuber, Markus Graefen, Tobias Maurer, Christian Brandts, Severine Banek, Felix K H Chun, Philipp Mandel\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnumed.124.268807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><sup>177</sup>Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan prostate-specific membrane antigen (<sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA) therapy is under current scientific investigation and aims to become established in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, real-world evidence in treatment comparison is scant. <b>Methods:</b> We relied on the FRAMCAP database and compared cabazitaxel versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA therapy in mCRPC patients regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Sensitivity analyses addressed second- to fourth-line mCRPC treatment to approximate current phase III patient selection criteria. <b>Results:</b> Of 373 patients, 14% received cabazitaxel, 65% received <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA, and 21% received both. Patients undergoing <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA therapy were significantly older than cabazitaxel patients (median, 72 y vs. 66 y; <i>P</i> < 0.01), and a higher proportion had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 2 or more (12% vs. 5.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.1). Rates of a prostate-specific antigen decline of at least 50% were 32% versus 0% for <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus cabazitaxel. In outcome analyses, significant superior median PFS was observed for <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus cabazitaxel (13.4 mo vs. 7.1 mo, <i>P</i> < 0.001), even after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.38; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Regarding OS, rates also significantly differed, with median OS of 14.7 mo versus 16.5 mo versus 29.6 mo for cabazitaxel versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus both treatments (<i>P</i> < 0.01). In sensitivity analyses of second- to fourth-line mCRPC treatment, PFS rates and median OS rates for cabazitaxel versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus both therapies qualitatively remained the same as for the entire cohort. <b>Conclusion:</b> In a real-world setting, <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA provides significantly better PFS and qualitatively better OS rates than does cabazitaxel chemotherapy and should therefore be considered a valuable treatment option for advanced mCRPC patients according to the European Medicines Agency approval.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-World Comparison of Cabazitaxel Versus 177Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
177Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan prostate-specific membrane antigen (177Lu-PSMA) therapy is under current scientific investigation and aims to become established in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, real-world evidence in treatment comparison is scant. Methods: We relied on the FRAMCAP database and compared cabazitaxel versus 177Lu-PSMA therapy in mCRPC patients regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Sensitivity analyses addressed second- to fourth-line mCRPC treatment to approximate current phase III patient selection criteria. Results: Of 373 patients, 14% received cabazitaxel, 65% received 177Lu-PSMA, and 21% received both. Patients undergoing 177Lu-PSMA therapy were significantly older than cabazitaxel patients (median, 72 y vs. 66 y; P < 0.01), and a higher proportion had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 2 or more (12% vs. 5.0%, P = 0.1). Rates of a prostate-specific antigen decline of at least 50% were 32% versus 0% for 177Lu-PSMA versus cabazitaxel. In outcome analyses, significant superior median PFS was observed for 177Lu-PSMA versus cabazitaxel (13.4 mo vs. 7.1 mo, P < 0.001), even after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.38; P < 0.001). Regarding OS, rates also significantly differed, with median OS of 14.7 mo versus 16.5 mo versus 29.6 mo for cabazitaxel versus 177Lu-PSMA versus both treatments (P < 0.01). In sensitivity analyses of second- to fourth-line mCRPC treatment, PFS rates and median OS rates for cabazitaxel versus 177Lu-PSMA versus both therapies qualitatively remained the same as for the entire cohort. Conclusion: In a real-world setting, 177Lu-PSMA provides significantly better PFS and qualitatively better OS rates than does cabazitaxel chemotherapy and should therefore be considered a valuable treatment option for advanced mCRPC patients according to the European Medicines Agency approval.