卡巴齐他赛与 177Lu-PSMA 放射性药物治疗转移性钙化抗性前列腺癌的真实世界比较。

Mike Wenzel, Florestan Koll, Benedikt Hoeh, Clara Humke, Carolin Siech, Nicolai Mader, Amir Sabet, Daniel Groener, Thomas Steuber, Markus Graefen, Tobias Maurer, Christian Brandts, Severine Banek, Felix K H Chun, Philipp Mandel
{"title":"卡巴齐他赛与 177Lu-PSMA 放射性药物治疗转移性钙化抗性前列腺癌的真实世界比较。","authors":"Mike Wenzel, Florestan Koll, Benedikt Hoeh, Clara Humke, Carolin Siech, Nicolai Mader, Amir Sabet, Daniel Groener, Thomas Steuber, Markus Graefen, Tobias Maurer, Christian Brandts, Severine Banek, Felix K H Chun, Philipp Mandel","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><sup>177</sup>Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan prostate-specific membrane antigen (<sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA) therapy is under current scientific investigation and aims to become established in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, real-world evidence in treatment comparison is scant. <b>Methods:</b> We relied on the FRAMCAP database and compared cabazitaxel versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA therapy in mCRPC patients regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Sensitivity analyses addressed second- to fourth-line mCRPC treatment to approximate current phase III patient selection criteria. <b>Results:</b> Of 373 patients, 14% received cabazitaxel, 65% received <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA, and 21% received both. Patients undergoing <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA therapy were significantly older than cabazitaxel patients (median, 72 y vs. 66 y; <i>P</i> < 0.01), and a higher proportion had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 2 or more (12% vs. 5.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.1). Rates of a prostate-specific antigen decline of at least 50% were 32% versus 0% for <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus cabazitaxel. In outcome analyses, significant superior median PFS was observed for <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus cabazitaxel (13.4 mo vs. 7.1 mo, <i>P</i> < 0.001), even after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.38; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Regarding OS, rates also significantly differed, with median OS of 14.7 mo versus 16.5 mo versus 29.6 mo for cabazitaxel versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus both treatments (<i>P</i> < 0.01). In sensitivity analyses of second- to fourth-line mCRPC treatment, PFS rates and median OS rates for cabazitaxel versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus both therapies qualitatively remained the same as for the entire cohort. <b>Conclusion:</b> In a real-world setting, <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA provides significantly better PFS and qualitatively better OS rates than does cabazitaxel chemotherapy and should therefore be considered a valuable treatment option for advanced mCRPC patients according to the European Medicines Agency approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":94099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Comparison of Cabazitaxel Versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Mike Wenzel, Florestan Koll, Benedikt Hoeh, Clara Humke, Carolin Siech, Nicolai Mader, Amir Sabet, Daniel Groener, Thomas Steuber, Markus Graefen, Tobias Maurer, Christian Brandts, Severine Banek, Felix K H Chun, Philipp Mandel\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnumed.124.268807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><sup>177</sup>Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan prostate-specific membrane antigen (<sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA) therapy is under current scientific investigation and aims to become established in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, real-world evidence in treatment comparison is scant. <b>Methods:</b> We relied on the FRAMCAP database and compared cabazitaxel versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA therapy in mCRPC patients regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Sensitivity analyses addressed second- to fourth-line mCRPC treatment to approximate current phase III patient selection criteria. <b>Results:</b> Of 373 patients, 14% received cabazitaxel, 65% received <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA, and 21% received both. Patients undergoing <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA therapy were significantly older than cabazitaxel patients (median, 72 y vs. 66 y; <i>P</i> < 0.01), and a higher proportion had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 2 or more (12% vs. 5.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.1). Rates of a prostate-specific antigen decline of at least 50% were 32% versus 0% for <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus cabazitaxel. In outcome analyses, significant superior median PFS was observed for <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus cabazitaxel (13.4 mo vs. 7.1 mo, <i>P</i> < 0.001), even after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.38; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Regarding OS, rates also significantly differed, with median OS of 14.7 mo versus 16.5 mo versus 29.6 mo for cabazitaxel versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus both treatments (<i>P</i> < 0.01). In sensitivity analyses of second- to fourth-line mCRPC treatment, PFS rates and median OS rates for cabazitaxel versus <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA versus both therapies qualitatively remained the same as for the entire cohort. <b>Conclusion:</b> In a real-world setting, <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA provides significantly better PFS and qualitatively better OS rates than does cabazitaxel chemotherapy and should therefore be considered a valuable treatment option for advanced mCRPC patients according to the European Medicines Agency approval.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

177Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan前列腺特异性膜抗原(177Lu-PSMA)疗法目前正在接受科学调查,旨在成为治疗转移性耐受性前列腺癌(mCRPC)的成熟疗法。然而,治疗对比的实际证据却很少。方法:我们利用 FRAMCAP 数据库,比较了卡巴他赛与 177Lu-PSMA 治疗 mCRPC 患者的无进展生存期 (PFS) 和总生存期 (OS)。敏感性分析针对二线至四线 mCRPC 治疗,以接近当前的 III 期患者选择标准。结果显示在373名患者中,14%接受了卡巴他赛治疗,65%接受了177Lu-PSMA治疗,21%同时接受了这两种治疗。接受177Lu-PSMA治疗的患者年龄明显大于卡巴他赛患者(中位数为72岁对66岁;P<0.01),东方合作肿瘤组织评分为2分或以上的患者比例较高(12%对5.0%,P=0.1)。177Lu-PSMA与卡巴他赛相比,前列腺特异性抗原下降至少50%的比例分别为32%和0%。在结果分析中,177Lu-PSMA的中位PFS明显优于卡巴他赛(13.4个月对7.1个月,P<0.001),即使经过多变量调整后也是如此(危险比为0.38;P<0.001)。在OS方面,卡巴齐他赛与177Lu-PSMA相比,两种治疗方法的中位OS分别为14.7个月对16.5个月对29.6个月(P<0.01)。在二线至四线mCRPC治疗的敏感性分析中,卡巴他赛与177Lu-PSMA相比,两种疗法的PFS率和中位OS率在性质上与整个队列相同。结论在现实世界中,177Lu-PSMA的PFS率和OS率明显优于卡巴他赛化疗,因此根据欧洲药品管理局的批准,177Lu-PSMA应被视为晚期mCRPC患者的重要治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-World Comparison of Cabazitaxel Versus 177Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

177Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan prostate-specific membrane antigen (177Lu-PSMA) therapy is under current scientific investigation and aims to become established in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, real-world evidence in treatment comparison is scant. Methods: We relied on the FRAMCAP database and compared cabazitaxel versus 177Lu-PSMA therapy in mCRPC patients regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Sensitivity analyses addressed second- to fourth-line mCRPC treatment to approximate current phase III patient selection criteria. Results: Of 373 patients, 14% received cabazitaxel, 65% received 177Lu-PSMA, and 21% received both. Patients undergoing 177Lu-PSMA therapy were significantly older than cabazitaxel patients (median, 72 y vs. 66 y; P < 0.01), and a higher proportion had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 2 or more (12% vs. 5.0%, P = 0.1). Rates of a prostate-specific antigen decline of at least 50% were 32% versus 0% for 177Lu-PSMA versus cabazitaxel. In outcome analyses, significant superior median PFS was observed for 177Lu-PSMA versus cabazitaxel (13.4 mo vs. 7.1 mo, P < 0.001), even after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.38; P < 0.001). Regarding OS, rates also significantly differed, with median OS of 14.7 mo versus 16.5 mo versus 29.6 mo for cabazitaxel versus 177Lu-PSMA versus both treatments (P < 0.01). In sensitivity analyses of second- to fourth-line mCRPC treatment, PFS rates and median OS rates for cabazitaxel versus 177Lu-PSMA versus both therapies qualitatively remained the same as for the entire cohort. Conclusion: In a real-world setting, 177Lu-PSMA provides significantly better PFS and qualitatively better OS rates than does cabazitaxel chemotherapy and should therefore be considered a valuable treatment option for advanced mCRPC patients according to the European Medicines Agency approval.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信