开发儿科神经肿瘤学服务评估辅助工具:儿科神经肿瘤学服务能力评估工具。

IF 3.7 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuro-oncology advances Pub Date : 2024-10-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/noajnl/vdae171
Revathi Rajagopal, Rosdali Diaz Coronado, Syed Ahmer Hamid, Regina Navarro Martin Del Campo, Frederick Boop, Asim Bag, Alma Edith Benito Reséndiz, Vasudeva Bhat K, Danny Campos, Kenneth Chang, Ramona Cirt, Ludi Dhyani Rahmartani, Jen Chun Foo, Julieta Hoveyan, John T Lucas, Thandeka Ngcana, Rahat Ul Ain, Nuha Omran, Diana S Osorio, Bilal Mazhar Qureshi, Noah D Sabin, Ernestina Schandorf, Patrick Bankah, Mary-Ann Dadzie, Hafisatu Gbadamos, Hend Sharafeldin, Mahendra Somathilaka, Peiyi Yang, Yao Atteby Jean-Jacques, Anan Zhang, Zeena Salman, Miriam Gonzalez, Paola Friedrich, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, Ibrahim Qaddoumi, Daniel C Moreira
{"title":"开发儿科神经肿瘤学服务评估辅助工具:儿科神经肿瘤学服务能力评估工具。","authors":"Revathi Rajagopal, Rosdali Diaz Coronado, Syed Ahmer Hamid, Regina Navarro Martin Del Campo, Frederick Boop, Asim Bag, Alma Edith Benito Reséndiz, Vasudeva Bhat K, Danny Campos, Kenneth Chang, Ramona Cirt, Ludi Dhyani Rahmartani, Jen Chun Foo, Julieta Hoveyan, John T Lucas, Thandeka Ngcana, Rahat Ul Ain, Nuha Omran, Diana S Osorio, Bilal Mazhar Qureshi, Noah D Sabin, Ernestina Schandorf, Patrick Bankah, Mary-Ann Dadzie, Hafisatu Gbadamos, Hend Sharafeldin, Mahendra Somathilaka, Peiyi Yang, Yao Atteby Jean-Jacques, Anan Zhang, Zeena Salman, Miriam Gonzalez, Paola Friedrich, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, Ibrahim Qaddoumi, Daniel C Moreira","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To enhance the quality of care available for children with central nervous system (CNS) tumors across the world, a systematic evaluation of capacity is needed to identify gaps and prioritize interventions. To that end, we created the pediatric neuro-oncology (PNO) resource assessment aid (PANORAMA) tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The development of PANORAMA encompassed 3 phases: operationalization, consensus building, and piloting. PANORAMA aimed to capture the elements of the PNO care continuum through domains with weighted assessments reflecting their importance. Responses were ordinally scored to reflect the level of satisfaction. PANORAMA was revised based on feedback at various phases to improve its relevance, usability, and clarity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operationalization phase identified 14 domains by using 252 questions. The consensus phase involved 15 experts (6 pediatric oncologists, 3 radiation oncologists, 2 neurosurgeons, 2 radiologists, and 2 pathologists). The consensus phase validated the identified domains, questions, and scoring methodology. The PANORAMA domains included national context, hospital infrastructure, organization and service integration, human resources, financing, laboratory, neurosurgery, diagnostic imaging, pathology, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, supportive care, and patient outcomes. PANORAMA was piloted at 13 institutions in 12 countries, representing diverse patient care contexts. Face validity was assessed by examining the correlation between the estimated score by respondents and calculated PANORAMA scores for each domain (<i>r</i> = 0.67, <i>P</i> < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PANORAMA was developed through a systematic, collaborative approach, ensuring its relevance to evaluate core elements of PNO service capacity. Distribution of PANORAMA will enable quantitative service evaluations across institutions, facilitating benchmarking and the prioritization of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"6 1","pages":"vdae171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the pediatric neuro-oncology services assessment aid: An assessment tool for pediatric neuro-oncology service delivery capacity.\",\"authors\":\"Revathi Rajagopal, Rosdali Diaz Coronado, Syed Ahmer Hamid, Regina Navarro Martin Del Campo, Frederick Boop, Asim Bag, Alma Edith Benito Reséndiz, Vasudeva Bhat K, Danny Campos, Kenneth Chang, Ramona Cirt, Ludi Dhyani Rahmartani, Jen Chun Foo, Julieta Hoveyan, John T Lucas, Thandeka Ngcana, Rahat Ul Ain, Nuha Omran, Diana S Osorio, Bilal Mazhar Qureshi, Noah D Sabin, Ernestina Schandorf, Patrick Bankah, Mary-Ann Dadzie, Hafisatu Gbadamos, Hend Sharafeldin, Mahendra Somathilaka, Peiyi Yang, Yao Atteby Jean-Jacques, Anan Zhang, Zeena Salman, Miriam Gonzalez, Paola Friedrich, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, Ibrahim Qaddoumi, Daniel C Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/noajnl/vdae171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To enhance the quality of care available for children with central nervous system (CNS) tumors across the world, a systematic evaluation of capacity is needed to identify gaps and prioritize interventions. To that end, we created the pediatric neuro-oncology (PNO) resource assessment aid (PANORAMA) tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The development of PANORAMA encompassed 3 phases: operationalization, consensus building, and piloting. PANORAMA aimed to capture the elements of the PNO care continuum through domains with weighted assessments reflecting their importance. Responses were ordinally scored to reflect the level of satisfaction. PANORAMA was revised based on feedback at various phases to improve its relevance, usability, and clarity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operationalization phase identified 14 domains by using 252 questions. The consensus phase involved 15 experts (6 pediatric oncologists, 3 radiation oncologists, 2 neurosurgeons, 2 radiologists, and 2 pathologists). The consensus phase validated the identified domains, questions, and scoring methodology. The PANORAMA domains included national context, hospital infrastructure, organization and service integration, human resources, financing, laboratory, neurosurgery, diagnostic imaging, pathology, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, supportive care, and patient outcomes. PANORAMA was piloted at 13 institutions in 12 countries, representing diverse patient care contexts. Face validity was assessed by examining the correlation between the estimated score by respondents and calculated PANORAMA scores for each domain (<i>r</i> = 0.67, <i>P</i> < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PANORAMA was developed through a systematic, collaborative approach, ensuring its relevance to evaluate core elements of PNO service capacity. Distribution of PANORAMA will enable quantitative service evaluations across institutions, facilitating benchmarking and the prioritization of interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology advances\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"vdae171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555432/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为提高全球中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤患儿的治疗质量,需要对治疗能力进行系统评估,以找出差距并确定干预措施的优先次序。为此,我们开发了儿科神经肿瘤学(PNO)资源评估辅助工具(PANORAMA):PANORAMA 的开发包括三个阶段:操作化、建立共识和试点。PANORAMA 的目标是通过反映其重要性的加权评估领域来捕捉脑神经网络病治疗连续性的要素。回答按顺序打分,以反映满意程度。根据各阶段的反馈意见对 PANORAMA 进行了修订,以提高其相关性、可用性和清晰度:操作阶段通过 252 个问题确定了 14 个领域。15 位专家(6 位儿科肿瘤学家、3 位放射肿瘤学家、2 位神经外科医生、2 位放射科医生和 2 位病理学家)参与了共识阶段。共识阶段对确定的领域、问题和评分方法进行了验证。PANORAMA 的领域包括国家背景、医院基础设施、组织和服务整合、人力资源、融资、实验室、神经外科、影像诊断、病理学、化疗、放疗、支持性护理和患者预后。PANORAMA 在 12 个国家的 13 家机构进行了试点,代表了不同的患者护理环境。通过检查受访者的估计得分与计算得出的 PANORAMA 各领域得分之间的相关性(r = 0.67,P 结论),对表面效度进行了评估:PANORAMA 是通过系统化的合作方法开发的,确保了其与评估 PNO 服务能力核心要素的相关性。分发 PANORAMA 可以对各机构的服务进行定量评估,有助于制定基准和确定干预措施的优先次序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of the pediatric neuro-oncology services assessment aid: An assessment tool for pediatric neuro-oncology service delivery capacity.

Background: To enhance the quality of care available for children with central nervous system (CNS) tumors across the world, a systematic evaluation of capacity is needed to identify gaps and prioritize interventions. To that end, we created the pediatric neuro-oncology (PNO) resource assessment aid (PANORAMA) tool.

Methods: The development of PANORAMA encompassed 3 phases: operationalization, consensus building, and piloting. PANORAMA aimed to capture the elements of the PNO care continuum through domains with weighted assessments reflecting their importance. Responses were ordinally scored to reflect the level of satisfaction. PANORAMA was revised based on feedback at various phases to improve its relevance, usability, and clarity.

Results: The operationalization phase identified 14 domains by using 252 questions. The consensus phase involved 15 experts (6 pediatric oncologists, 3 radiation oncologists, 2 neurosurgeons, 2 radiologists, and 2 pathologists). The consensus phase validated the identified domains, questions, and scoring methodology. The PANORAMA domains included national context, hospital infrastructure, organization and service integration, human resources, financing, laboratory, neurosurgery, diagnostic imaging, pathology, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, supportive care, and patient outcomes. PANORAMA was piloted at 13 institutions in 12 countries, representing diverse patient care contexts. Face validity was assessed by examining the correlation between the estimated score by respondents and calculated PANORAMA scores for each domain (r = 0.67, P < .0001).

Conclusions: PANORAMA was developed through a systematic, collaborative approach, ensuring its relevance to evaluate core elements of PNO service capacity. Distribution of PANORAMA will enable quantitative service evaluations across institutions, facilitating benchmarking and the prioritization of interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信