波兰人和塞尔维亚人唾液微生物组特征及其预测生物地理祖先的潜力。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Katarzyna Skonieczna , Natasa Kovacevic-Grujicic , Aashish Srivastava , Mariusz Gawrych , Marzanna Ciesielka , Nisha Rana , Danijela Drakulic , Marija Mojsin , Milena Milivojevic , Milena Stevanovic , Grzegorz Teresiński , Tomasz Grzybowski
{"title":"波兰人和塞尔维亚人唾液微生物组特征及其预测生物地理祖先的潜力。","authors":"Katarzyna Skonieczna ,&nbsp;Natasa Kovacevic-Grujicic ,&nbsp;Aashish Srivastava ,&nbsp;Mariusz Gawrych ,&nbsp;Marzanna Ciesielka ,&nbsp;Nisha Rana ,&nbsp;Danijela Drakulic ,&nbsp;Marija Mojsin ,&nbsp;Milena Milivojevic ,&nbsp;Milena Stevanovic ,&nbsp;Grzegorz Teresiński ,&nbsp;Tomasz Grzybowski","doi":"10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biogeographical ancestry analysis is valuable in forensic investigations, especially in missing person cases or crimes without eyewitnesses, as it helps to infer geographic origins from genetic markers. This approach enhances forensic efforts by providing essential clues for identifying individuals with limited direct evidence. Slavic-speaking populations are poorly distinguishable based on human genome variability. However, recent studies show that even populations with close biogeographic origin could be differentiated based on salivary microbiomes. Nevertheless, the salivary microbiomes of Slavs have not been characterized yet. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the composition of the salivary microbiomes of Western and Southern Slavs’ representatives. 16S rRNA libraries from salivary microbiomes of 40 Poles (Western Slavs) and 40 Serbians (Southern Slavs) were prepared <em>via</em> PCR and sequenced on the MiSeq FGx platform (Illumina), giving approximately 100,000 reads per sample. Bioinformatic and statistical analyses were performed to assess the alpha and beta diversity of microbiomes and determine the differences in the abundance of bacterial genera between the groups studied. Analyses of alpha (ACE, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) and beta (Jaccard and Bray-Curtis dissimilarity) diversities in the salivary microbiomes clearly distinguished between Poles and Serbians. Alpha and beta diversity metrics were significantly higher in the Serbian population. <em>Fusobacterium, Lautropia, Porphyromonas, Actinobacillus, Capnocytophaga</em>, and <em>Kingella</em> were the most significantly increased genera in Serbians, whereas <em>Veillonella, Selenomonas, Megasphaera,</em> and <em>Atopobium</em> were more prevalent in Poles. In summary, our study identified significant differences in the salivary microbiomes of Poles and Serbians, with distinct microbial signatures associated with each population. These findings highlight the potential of salivary microbiome analysis as a tool for predicting biogeographic ancestry. Nevertheless, further analysis extended to other Slavic-speaking populations is necessary to clarify this issue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50435,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 103173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salivary microbiome signatures of Poles and Serbians and its potential for prediction of biogeographic ancestry\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Skonieczna ,&nbsp;Natasa Kovacevic-Grujicic ,&nbsp;Aashish Srivastava ,&nbsp;Mariusz Gawrych ,&nbsp;Marzanna Ciesielka ,&nbsp;Nisha Rana ,&nbsp;Danijela Drakulic ,&nbsp;Marija Mojsin ,&nbsp;Milena Milivojevic ,&nbsp;Milena Stevanovic ,&nbsp;Grzegorz Teresiński ,&nbsp;Tomasz Grzybowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Biogeographical ancestry analysis is valuable in forensic investigations, especially in missing person cases or crimes without eyewitnesses, as it helps to infer geographic origins from genetic markers. This approach enhances forensic efforts by providing essential clues for identifying individuals with limited direct evidence. Slavic-speaking populations are poorly distinguishable based on human genome variability. However, recent studies show that even populations with close biogeographic origin could be differentiated based on salivary microbiomes. Nevertheless, the salivary microbiomes of Slavs have not been characterized yet. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the composition of the salivary microbiomes of Western and Southern Slavs’ representatives. 16S rRNA libraries from salivary microbiomes of 40 Poles (Western Slavs) and 40 Serbians (Southern Slavs) were prepared <em>via</em> PCR and sequenced on the MiSeq FGx platform (Illumina), giving approximately 100,000 reads per sample. Bioinformatic and statistical analyses were performed to assess the alpha and beta diversity of microbiomes and determine the differences in the abundance of bacterial genera between the groups studied. Analyses of alpha (ACE, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) and beta (Jaccard and Bray-Curtis dissimilarity) diversities in the salivary microbiomes clearly distinguished between Poles and Serbians. Alpha and beta diversity metrics were significantly higher in the Serbian population. <em>Fusobacterium, Lautropia, Porphyromonas, Actinobacillus, Capnocytophaga</em>, and <em>Kingella</em> were the most significantly increased genera in Serbians, whereas <em>Veillonella, Selenomonas, Megasphaera,</em> and <em>Atopobium</em> were more prevalent in Poles. In summary, our study identified significant differences in the salivary microbiomes of Poles and Serbians, with distinct microbial signatures associated with each population. These findings highlight the potential of salivary microbiome analysis as a tool for predicting biogeographic ancestry. Nevertheless, further analysis extended to other Slavic-speaking populations is necessary to clarify this issue.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International-Genetics\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International-Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497324001698\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497324001698","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物地理祖先分析在法医调查中很有价值,特别是在失踪人员案件或没有目击证人的犯罪案件中,因为它有助于从遗传标记推断地理起源。这种方法能在直接证据有限的情况下为确定个人身份提供重要线索,从而加强法医工作。根据人类基因组的变异性,讲斯拉夫语的人群很难区分。然而,最近的研究表明,即使是生物地理起源相近的人群也可以根据唾液微生物组进行区分。尽管如此,斯拉夫人唾液微生物组的特征尚未得到研究。因此,本研究旨在比较西方和南方斯拉夫人代表的唾液微生物组的组成。研究人员通过 PCR 从 40 个波兰人(西部斯拉夫人)和 40 个塞尔维亚人(南部斯拉夫人)的唾液微生物组中制备了 16S rRNA 文库,并在 MiSeq FGx 平台(Illumina)上进行了测序,每个样本可获得约 100,000 个读数。研究人员进行了生物信息学和统计学分析,以评估微生物组的α和β多样性,并确定研究群体之间细菌属丰度的差异。对唾液微生物组的α(ACE、Chao1、Shannon和Simpson)和β(Jaccard和Bray-Curtis相似性)多样性进行的分析明确区分了波兰人和塞尔维亚人。塞尔维亚人的α和β多样性指标明显更高。在塞尔维亚人中,Fusobacterium、Lautropia、Porphyromonas、Actinobacillus、Capnocytophaga 和 Kingella 是增加最明显的菌属,而在波兰人中,Veillonella、Selenomonas、Megasphaera 和 Atopobium 则更为普遍。总之,我们的研究发现了波兰人和塞尔维亚人唾液微生物组的显著差异,每个人群都有不同的微生物特征。这些发现凸显了唾液微生物组分析作为预测生物地理祖先的工具的潜力。不过,有必要对其他斯拉夫语人群进行进一步分析,以澄清这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Salivary microbiome signatures of Poles and Serbians and its potential for prediction of biogeographic ancestry
Biogeographical ancestry analysis is valuable in forensic investigations, especially in missing person cases or crimes without eyewitnesses, as it helps to infer geographic origins from genetic markers. This approach enhances forensic efforts by providing essential clues for identifying individuals with limited direct evidence. Slavic-speaking populations are poorly distinguishable based on human genome variability. However, recent studies show that even populations with close biogeographic origin could be differentiated based on salivary microbiomes. Nevertheless, the salivary microbiomes of Slavs have not been characterized yet. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the composition of the salivary microbiomes of Western and Southern Slavs’ representatives. 16S rRNA libraries from salivary microbiomes of 40 Poles (Western Slavs) and 40 Serbians (Southern Slavs) were prepared via PCR and sequenced on the MiSeq FGx platform (Illumina), giving approximately 100,000 reads per sample. Bioinformatic and statistical analyses were performed to assess the alpha and beta diversity of microbiomes and determine the differences in the abundance of bacterial genera between the groups studied. Analyses of alpha (ACE, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) and beta (Jaccard and Bray-Curtis dissimilarity) diversities in the salivary microbiomes clearly distinguished between Poles and Serbians. Alpha and beta diversity metrics were significantly higher in the Serbian population. Fusobacterium, Lautropia, Porphyromonas, Actinobacillus, Capnocytophaga, and Kingella were the most significantly increased genera in Serbians, whereas Veillonella, Selenomonas, Megasphaera, and Atopobium were more prevalent in Poles. In summary, our study identified significant differences in the salivary microbiomes of Poles and Serbians, with distinct microbial signatures associated with each population. These findings highlight the potential of salivary microbiome analysis as a tool for predicting biogeographic ancestry. Nevertheless, further analysis extended to other Slavic-speaking populations is necessary to clarify this issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
32.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
11.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International: Genetics is the premier journal in the field of Forensic Genetics. This branch of Forensic Science can be defined as the application of genetics to human and non-human material (in the sense of a science with the purpose of studying inherited characteristics for the analysis of inter- and intra-specific variations in populations) for the resolution of legal conflicts. The scope of the journal includes: Forensic applications of human polymorphism. Testing of paternity and other family relationships, immigration cases, typing of biological stains and tissues from criminal casework, identification of human remains by DNA testing methodologies. Description of human polymorphisms of forensic interest, with special interest in DNA polymorphisms. Autosomal DNA polymorphisms, mini- and microsatellites (or short tandem repeats, STRs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), X and Y chromosome polymorphisms, mtDNA polymorphisms, and any other type of DNA variation with potential forensic applications. Non-human DNA polymorphisms for crime scene investigation. Population genetics of human polymorphisms of forensic interest. Population data, especially from DNA polymorphisms of interest for the solution of forensic problems. DNA typing methodologies and strategies. Biostatistical methods in forensic genetics. Evaluation of DNA evidence in forensic problems (such as paternity or immigration cases, criminal casework, identification), classical and new statistical approaches. Standards in forensic genetics. Recommendations of regulatory bodies concerning methods, markers, interpretation or strategies or proposals for procedural or technical standards. Quality control. Quality control and quality assurance strategies, proficiency testing for DNA typing methodologies. Criminal DNA databases. Technical, legal and statistical issues. General ethical and legal issues related to forensic genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信