{"title":"在一线治疗老年输血依赖型非重型再生障碍性贫血患者时,环孢素加阿伐溴铂与环孢素单药对比:一项单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Zhuxin Zhang, Qinglin Hu, Leyu Wang, Chen Yang, Miao Chen, Bing Han","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2024.2424451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elderly patients with transfusion-dependent non-severe aplastic anemia (TD-NSAA) face limited treatment options owing to transplantation incompatibility and safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from older patients (≥60 years) newly diagnosed with TD-NSAA and had been treated with either avatrombopag (AVA) + cyclosporine (CsA) or CsA monotherapy at our center were retrospectively collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 52 patients were enrolled, with 26 receiving AVA + CsA and 26 receiving CsA monotherapy. The overall response (OR) rate was higher in the AVA + CsA group than in the CsA group at the 1<sup>st</sup>, 2<sup>nd</sup>, 3<sup>rd</sup>, 6<sup>th</sup> months, and at the end of the follow-up (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The complete response (CR) rate was higher in the AVA + CsA group than in the CsA group at the 6<sup>th</sup> month and at the end of follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.017 and 0.039). Patients receiving AVA + CsA had a shorter time to achieve the first response (<i>p</i> = 0.008) and CR (<i>p</i> = 0.010) than those receiving CsA monotherapy. Furthermore, patients receiving AVA + CsA exhibited a higher rate of platelet transfusion independence at the 3<sup>rd</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.041), 6<sup>th</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.008) months, and likewise at the end of the follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.097).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of AVA to CsA can significantly improve the OR or CR rate and platelet levels with acceptable side effects in elderly patients, which implies that the combination is a viable alternative for elderly patients with TD-NSAA.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"56 1","pages":"2424451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyclosporine plus avatrombopag versus cyclosporine monotherapy for first-line treatment of elderly patients with transfusion-dependent non-severe aplastic anemia: a single center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhuxin Zhang, Qinglin Hu, Leyu Wang, Chen Yang, Miao Chen, Bing Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07853890.2024.2424451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elderly patients with transfusion-dependent non-severe aplastic anemia (TD-NSAA) face limited treatment options owing to transplantation incompatibility and safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from older patients (≥60 years) newly diagnosed with TD-NSAA and had been treated with either avatrombopag (AVA) + cyclosporine (CsA) or CsA monotherapy at our center were retrospectively collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 52 patients were enrolled, with 26 receiving AVA + CsA and 26 receiving CsA monotherapy. The overall response (OR) rate was higher in the AVA + CsA group than in the CsA group at the 1<sup>st</sup>, 2<sup>nd</sup>, 3<sup>rd</sup>, 6<sup>th</sup> months, and at the end of the follow-up (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The complete response (CR) rate was higher in the AVA + CsA group than in the CsA group at the 6<sup>th</sup> month and at the end of follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.017 and 0.039). Patients receiving AVA + CsA had a shorter time to achieve the first response (<i>p</i> = 0.008) and CR (<i>p</i> = 0.010) than those receiving CsA monotherapy. Furthermore, patients receiving AVA + CsA exhibited a higher rate of platelet transfusion independence at the 3<sup>rd</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.041), 6<sup>th</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.008) months, and likewise at the end of the follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.097).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of AVA to CsA can significantly improve the OR or CR rate and platelet levels with acceptable side effects in elderly patients, which implies that the combination is a viable alternative for elderly patients with TD-NSAA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"2424451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559020/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2424451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2424451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cyclosporine plus avatrombopag versus cyclosporine monotherapy for first-line treatment of elderly patients with transfusion-dependent non-severe aplastic anemia: a single center retrospective study.
Background: Elderly patients with transfusion-dependent non-severe aplastic anemia (TD-NSAA) face limited treatment options owing to transplantation incompatibility and safety concerns.
Methods: Data from older patients (≥60 years) newly diagnosed with TD-NSAA and had been treated with either avatrombopag (AVA) + cyclosporine (CsA) or CsA monotherapy at our center were retrospectively collected.
Results: In total, 52 patients were enrolled, with 26 receiving AVA + CsA and 26 receiving CsA monotherapy. The overall response (OR) rate was higher in the AVA + CsA group than in the CsA group at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th months, and at the end of the follow-up (all p < 0.05). The complete response (CR) rate was higher in the AVA + CsA group than in the CsA group at the 6th month and at the end of follow-up (p = 0.017 and 0.039). Patients receiving AVA + CsA had a shorter time to achieve the first response (p = 0.008) and CR (p = 0.010) than those receiving CsA monotherapy. Furthermore, patients receiving AVA + CsA exhibited a higher rate of platelet transfusion independence at the 3rd (p = 0.041), 6th (p = 0.008) months, and likewise at the end of the follow-up (p = 0.097).
Conclusions: The addition of AVA to CsA can significantly improve the OR or CR rate and platelet levels with acceptable side effects in elderly patients, which implies that the combination is a viable alternative for elderly patients with TD-NSAA.