比较 nSOFA、CRIB-II 和 SNAPPE-II,预测妊娠期不足 32 周早产儿的死亡率和短期发病率。

Annals of medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1080/07853890.2024.2426752
Qingfei Hao, Jing Chen, Haoming Chen, Jing Zhang, Yanna Du, Xiuyong Cheng
{"title":"比较 nSOFA、CRIB-II 和 SNAPPE-II,预测妊娠期不足 32 周早产儿的死亡率和短期发病率。","authors":"Qingfei Hao, Jing Chen, Haoming Chen, Jing Zhang, Yanna Du, Xiuyong Cheng","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2024.2426752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal illness severity scores are not extensively studied for their ability to predict mortality or morbidity in preterm infants. The aim of this study was to compare the Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (nSOFA), Clinical Risk Index for Babies-II (CRIB-II), and Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal extension-II (SNAPPE-II) for predicting mortality and short-term morbidities in preterm infants ≤32 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, infants born in 2017-2018 with gestational age (GA) ≤32 weeks were evaluated. nSOFA, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE-II scores were calculated for each patient, and the ability of these scores to predict mortality and morbidities was compared. The morbidities were categorized as mod/sev bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) requiring surgery, early-onset sepsis (EOS), late-onset sepsis (LOS), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment, and severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). Calculating the area under the curve (AUC) on receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) analysis to predict and compare scoring systems' accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 759 preterm infants were enrolled, of whom 88 deceased. The median nSOFA, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE-II scores were 2 (0, 3), 6 (4, 8), and 13 (5, 26), respectively. Compared with infants who survived, these three scores were significantly higher in those who deceased (<i>p</i> < 0.05). For predicting mortality, the AUC of the nSOFA, SNAPPE-II, and CRIB-II were 0.90, 0.82, and 0.79, respectively. The nSOFA scoring system had significantly higher AUC than CRIB-II and SNAPPE-II (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, short-term morbidities were not strongly correlated with these three scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In infants ≤32 weeks gestation, nSOFA scoring system is more valuable in predicting mortality than SNAPPE-II and CRIB-II. However, further studies are required to assess the predictive power of neonatal illness severity scores for morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"56 1","pages":"2426752"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552290/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing nSOFA, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE-II for predicting mortality and short-term morbidities in preterm infants ≤32 weeks gestation.\",\"authors\":\"Qingfei Hao, Jing Chen, Haoming Chen, Jing Zhang, Yanna Du, Xiuyong Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07853890.2024.2426752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal illness severity scores are not extensively studied for their ability to predict mortality or morbidity in preterm infants. The aim of this study was to compare the Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (nSOFA), Clinical Risk Index for Babies-II (CRIB-II), and Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal extension-II (SNAPPE-II) for predicting mortality and short-term morbidities in preterm infants ≤32 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, infants born in 2017-2018 with gestational age (GA) ≤32 weeks were evaluated. nSOFA, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE-II scores were calculated for each patient, and the ability of these scores to predict mortality and morbidities was compared. The morbidities were categorized as mod/sev bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) requiring surgery, early-onset sepsis (EOS), late-onset sepsis (LOS), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment, and severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). Calculating the area under the curve (AUC) on receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) analysis to predict and compare scoring systems' accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 759 preterm infants were enrolled, of whom 88 deceased. The median nSOFA, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE-II scores were 2 (0, 3), 6 (4, 8), and 13 (5, 26), respectively. Compared with infants who survived, these three scores were significantly higher in those who deceased (<i>p</i> < 0.05). For predicting mortality, the AUC of the nSOFA, SNAPPE-II, and CRIB-II were 0.90, 0.82, and 0.79, respectively. The nSOFA scoring system had significantly higher AUC than CRIB-II and SNAPPE-II (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, short-term morbidities were not strongly correlated with these three scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In infants ≤32 weeks gestation, nSOFA scoring system is more valuable in predicting mortality than SNAPPE-II and CRIB-II. However, further studies are required to assess the predictive power of neonatal illness severity scores for morbidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"2426752\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552290/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2426752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2426752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新生儿疾病严重程度评分在预测早产儿死亡率或发病率方面的能力尚未得到广泛研究。本研究旨在比较新生儿序贯器官衰竭评估(nSOFA)、婴儿临床风险指数-II(CRIB-II)和围产期扩展新生儿急性生理学评分-II(SNAPPE-II)预测≤32周早产儿死亡率和短期发病率的能力:在这项回顾性研究中,对2017-2018年出生的胎龄(GA)≤32周的婴儿进行了评估。计算了每位患者的nSOFA、CRIB-II和SNAPPE-II评分,并比较了这些评分预测死亡率和发病率的能力。发病情况分为中/重度支气管肺发育不良(BPD)、需要手术治疗的坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)、早发败血症(EOS)、晚发败血症(LOS)、需要治疗的早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)和严重脑室内出血(IVH)。计算接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析的曲线下面积(AUC),以预测和比较评分系统的准确性:共纳入 759 名早产儿,其中 88 名死亡。nSOFA、CRIB-II和SNAPPE-II评分的中位数分别为2(0,3)、6(4,8)和13(5,26)。与存活的婴儿相比,死亡婴儿的这三个评分明显更高(P P 结论):对于妊娠不足 32 周的婴儿,nSOFA 评分系统在预测死亡率方面比 SNAPPE-II 和 CRIB-II 更有价值。然而,还需要进一步研究来评估新生儿疾病严重程度评分对发病率的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing nSOFA, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE-II for predicting mortality and short-term morbidities in preterm infants ≤32 weeks gestation.

Background: Neonatal illness severity scores are not extensively studied for their ability to predict mortality or morbidity in preterm infants. The aim of this study was to compare the Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (nSOFA), Clinical Risk Index for Babies-II (CRIB-II), and Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal extension-II (SNAPPE-II) for predicting mortality and short-term morbidities in preterm infants ≤32 weeks.

Methods: In this retrospective study, infants born in 2017-2018 with gestational age (GA) ≤32 weeks were evaluated. nSOFA, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE-II scores were calculated for each patient, and the ability of these scores to predict mortality and morbidities was compared. The morbidities were categorized as mod/sev bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) requiring surgery, early-onset sepsis (EOS), late-onset sepsis (LOS), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment, and severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). Calculating the area under the curve (AUC) on receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) analysis to predict and compare scoring systems' accuracy.

Results: A total of 759 preterm infants were enrolled, of whom 88 deceased. The median nSOFA, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE-II scores were 2 (0, 3), 6 (4, 8), and 13 (5, 26), respectively. Compared with infants who survived, these three scores were significantly higher in those who deceased (p < 0.05). For predicting mortality, the AUC of the nSOFA, SNAPPE-II, and CRIB-II were 0.90, 0.82, and 0.79, respectively. The nSOFA scoring system had significantly higher AUC than CRIB-II and SNAPPE-II (p < 0.05). However, short-term morbidities were not strongly correlated with these three scoring systems.

Conclusion: In infants ≤32 weeks gestation, nSOFA scoring system is more valuable in predicting mortality than SNAPPE-II and CRIB-II. However, further studies are required to assess the predictive power of neonatal illness severity scores for morbidity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信