焦虑对探索的影响:计算模型研究综述。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ko-Ping Chou, Robert C Wilson, Ryan Smith
{"title":"焦虑对探索的影响:计算模型研究综述。","authors":"Ko-Ping Chou, Robert C Wilson, Ryan Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exploratory behaviors can serve an adaptive role within novel or changing environments. Namely, they facilitate information gain, allowing an organism to maintain accurate beliefs about the environment and select actions that better maximize reward. However, finding the optimal balance between exploration and reward-seeking behavior - the so-called explore-exploit dilemma - can be challenging, as it requires sensitivity to one's own uncertainty and to the predictability of one's surroundings. Given the close relationship between uncertainty and anxiety, a body of work has now also emerged identifying associated effects on exploration. In particular, the field of computational psychiatry has begun to use cognitive computational models to characterize how anxiety may modulate underlying information processing mechanisms, such as estimation of uncertainty and the value of information, and how this might contribute to psychopathology. Here, we review computational modeling studies investigating how exploration is influenced by anxiety. While some apparent inconsistencies remain to be resolved, studies using reinforcement learning tasks suggest that directed (but not random) forms of exploration may be elevated by trait and/or cognitive anxiety, but reduced by state and/or somatic anxiety. Anxiety is also consistently associated with less exploration in foraging tasks. Some differences in exploration may further stem from how anxiety modulates changes in uncertainty over time (learning rates). Jointly, these results highlight important directions for future work in refining choice of tasks and anxiety measures and maintaining consistent methodology across studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of anxiety on exploration: A review of computational modeling studies.\",\"authors\":\"Ko-Ping Chou, Robert C Wilson, Ryan Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Exploratory behaviors can serve an adaptive role within novel or changing environments. Namely, they facilitate information gain, allowing an organism to maintain accurate beliefs about the environment and select actions that better maximize reward. However, finding the optimal balance between exploration and reward-seeking behavior - the so-called explore-exploit dilemma - can be challenging, as it requires sensitivity to one's own uncertainty and to the predictability of one's surroundings. Given the close relationship between uncertainty and anxiety, a body of work has now also emerged identifying associated effects on exploration. In particular, the field of computational psychiatry has begun to use cognitive computational models to characterize how anxiety may modulate underlying information processing mechanisms, such as estimation of uncertainty and the value of information, and how this might contribute to psychopathology. Here, we review computational modeling studies investigating how exploration is influenced by anxiety. While some apparent inconsistencies remain to be resolved, studies using reinforcement learning tasks suggest that directed (but not random) forms of exploration may be elevated by trait and/or cognitive anxiety, but reduced by state and/or somatic anxiety. Anxiety is also consistently associated with less exploration in foraging tasks. Some differences in exploration may further stem from how anxiety modulates changes in uncertainty over time (learning rates). Jointly, these results highlight important directions for future work in refining choice of tasks and anxiety measures and maintaining consistent methodology across studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105940\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105940","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在新奇或不断变化的环境中,探索行为可以起到适应作用。也就是说,探索行为有助于获取信息,使生物体能够保持对环境的准确认知,并选择能更好地获得最大回报的行动。然而,要在探索和寻求回报的行为之间找到最佳平衡点--即所谓的探索--开发两难境地--是很有挑战性的,因为这需要对自身的不确定性和周围环境的可预测性保持敏感。鉴于不确定性与焦虑之间的密切关系,现在也出现了一系列工作来确定对探索的相关影响。特别是,计算精神病学领域已开始使用认知计算模型来描述焦虑可能如何调节潜在的信息处理机制,如对不确定性和信息价值的估计,以及这可能如何导致精神病理学。在此,我们回顾了有关焦虑如何影响探索的计算模型研究。虽然一些明显的不一致仍有待解决,但使用强化学习任务进行的研究表明,特质焦虑和/或认知焦虑可能会提高定向(而非随机)探索形式,但状态焦虑和/或躯体焦虑则会降低定向探索形式。在觅食任务中,焦虑也始终与较少的探索有关。探索中的某些差异可能进一步源于焦虑如何调节不确定性随时间的变化(学习率)。这些结果共同强调了未来工作的重要方向,即改进任务和焦虑测量方法的选择,并在各项研究中保持方法的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of anxiety on exploration: A review of computational modeling studies.

Exploratory behaviors can serve an adaptive role within novel or changing environments. Namely, they facilitate information gain, allowing an organism to maintain accurate beliefs about the environment and select actions that better maximize reward. However, finding the optimal balance between exploration and reward-seeking behavior - the so-called explore-exploit dilemma - can be challenging, as it requires sensitivity to one's own uncertainty and to the predictability of one's surroundings. Given the close relationship between uncertainty and anxiety, a body of work has now also emerged identifying associated effects on exploration. In particular, the field of computational psychiatry has begun to use cognitive computational models to characterize how anxiety may modulate underlying information processing mechanisms, such as estimation of uncertainty and the value of information, and how this might contribute to psychopathology. Here, we review computational modeling studies investigating how exploration is influenced by anxiety. While some apparent inconsistencies remain to be resolved, studies using reinforcement learning tasks suggest that directed (but not random) forms of exploration may be elevated by trait and/or cognitive anxiety, but reduced by state and/or somatic anxiety. Anxiety is also consistently associated with less exploration in foraging tasks. Some differences in exploration may further stem from how anxiety modulates changes in uncertainty over time (learning rates). Jointly, these results highlight important directions for future work in refining choice of tasks and anxiety measures and maintaining consistent methodology across studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信