经验丰富的成年人工耳蜗使用者使用基于解剖学的适配图后的语音感知效果:纵向研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Pelden Wangchuk, Cila Umat, Foong Yen Chong, Faizah Mohd Zaki, Asma Abdullah
{"title":"经验丰富的成年人工耳蜗使用者使用基于解剖学的适配图后的语音感知效果:纵向研究。","authors":"Pelden Wangchuk, Cila Umat, Foong Yen Chong, Faizah Mohd Zaki, Asma Abdullah","doi":"10.1159/000540965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anatomy-based fitting (ABF), a relatively new technique for cochlear implant programming, attempts to lessen the impact of the electrode insertion location-related frequency-to-place mismatch (FPM). This study aimed to compare vowels and consonant perception in quiet and in noise among experienced adult cochlear implant (CI) users using the ABF and the regular, conventional-based fitting (CBF) map (pre-ABF) over six months.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Nine ears from eight experienced adult CI users were included in the experimental and longitudinal research. Using surgical planning software called Otoplan, post-operative computed CT scans were used to determine the locations of intracochlear electrodes and their angle of insertion. The anatomy-based frequency bands were produced by Maestro 9.0 CI fitting software using the Otoplan data. Nonsense syllables with consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) recognition scores in quiet and noise (+5dB SNR) were compared at baseline, three, and six months after ABF. The vowels involved were /a, i, u/, while the consonants were voiced /b, d, g/ and voiceless /p, t, k/ plosives. Speech pieces were presented at 30 dB SL in a sound-treated room through a loudspeaker positioned at 0° azimuth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, the ABF maps shifted center frequency ranging from 0.46 semitones (0.04 octave) at (E12) to 23.94 semitones (1.99 octave) at (E1) as compared to the CBF maps. The mean vowel and consonant identification scores in quiet and in noise were significantly higher in ABF than in CBF (p<0.05) with a large effect size and the trend of improvement was seen with time. Voiced consonants had better scores than the voiceless consonants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrated improved perception of vowels and consonants, particularly for sounds containing voicing cues after using the ABF maps. The results also suggested that ABF could be more effective for voice detection in noise. Overall, the findings indicate that correcting place mismatch with an ABF map may improve speech perception, at least among experienced adult cochlear implant users.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speech Perception Outcomes with the Anatomy-Based Fitting Map Among Experienced, Adult Cochlear Implant Users: A Longitudinal Study.\",\"authors\":\"Pelden Wangchuk, Cila Umat, Foong Yen Chong, Faizah Mohd Zaki, Asma Abdullah\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anatomy-based fitting (ABF), a relatively new technique for cochlear implant programming, attempts to lessen the impact of the electrode insertion location-related frequency-to-place mismatch (FPM). This study aimed to compare vowels and consonant perception in quiet and in noise among experienced adult cochlear implant (CI) users using the ABF and the regular, conventional-based fitting (CBF) map (pre-ABF) over six months.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Nine ears from eight experienced adult CI users were included in the experimental and longitudinal research. Using surgical planning software called Otoplan, post-operative computed CT scans were used to determine the locations of intracochlear electrodes and their angle of insertion. The anatomy-based frequency bands were produced by Maestro 9.0 CI fitting software using the Otoplan data. Nonsense syllables with consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) recognition scores in quiet and noise (+5dB SNR) were compared at baseline, three, and six months after ABF. The vowels involved were /a, i, u/, while the consonants were voiced /b, d, g/ and voiceless /p, t, k/ plosives. Speech pieces were presented at 30 dB SL in a sound-treated room through a loudspeaker positioned at 0° azimuth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, the ABF maps shifted center frequency ranging from 0.46 semitones (0.04 octave) at (E12) to 23.94 semitones (1.99 octave) at (E1) as compared to the CBF maps. The mean vowel and consonant identification scores in quiet and in noise were significantly higher in ABF than in CBF (p<0.05) with a large effect size and the trend of improvement was seen with time. Voiced consonants had better scores than the voiceless consonants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrated improved perception of vowels and consonants, particularly for sounds containing voicing cues after using the ABF maps. The results also suggested that ABF could be more effective for voice detection in noise. Overall, the findings indicate that correcting place mismatch with an ABF map may improve speech perception, at least among experienced adult cochlear implant users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540965\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540965","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:基于解剖学的拟合(ABF)是人工耳蜗植入编程的一种相对较新的技术,它试图减少电极插入位置相关的频率-位置不匹配(FPM)的影响。本研究旨在比较经验丰富的成年人工耳蜗(CI)用户在安静和噪音环境下对元音和辅音的感知,使用 ABF 和常规的、基于传统拟合(CBF)的地图(pre-ABF),历时六个月:方法:8 名经验丰富的成人人工耳蜗用户的 9 只耳朵被纳入实验和纵向研究。使用名为 Otoplan 的手术规划软件,通过术后计算机 CT 扫描确定耳蜗内电极的位置及其插入角度。Maestro 9.0 CI 拟合软件使用 Otoplan 数据生成了基于解剖结构的频带。在基线、ABF 三个月和六个月后,对辅音-元音-辅音 (CVC) 的无意义音节在安静和噪音(+5dB SNR)中的识别分数进行比较。元音包括/a、i、u/,辅音包括有声/b、d、g/和无声/p、t、k/。在经过声音处理的房间内,通过方位角为 0° 的扬声器以 30 dB SL 的音量播放语音片段:与 CBF 地图相比,ABF 地图的中心频率平均偏移了 0.46 个半音(0.04 个八度音程),范围从(E12)到(E1)的 23.94 个半音(1.99 个八度音程)不等。在安静和噪音中,ABF 的元音和辅音识别平均得分明显高于 CBF(pConclusion):结果表明,使用 ABF 地图后,元音和辅音的感知能力有所提高,尤其是对含有发声线索的声音的感知能力。结果还表明,ABF 对噪声中的语音检测更为有效。总之,研究结果表明,使用 ABF 地图纠正位置不匹配可能会改善语音感知,至少在有经验的成年人工耳蜗用户中是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speech Perception Outcomes with the Anatomy-Based Fitting Map Among Experienced, Adult Cochlear Implant Users: A Longitudinal Study.

Introduction: Anatomy-based fitting (ABF), a relatively new technique for cochlear implant programming, attempts to lessen the impact of the electrode insertion location-related frequency-to-place mismatch (FPM). This study aimed to compare vowels and consonant perception in quiet and in noise among experienced adult cochlear implant (CI) users using the ABF and the regular, conventional-based fitting (CBF) map (pre-ABF) over six months.

Method: Nine ears from eight experienced adult CI users were included in the experimental and longitudinal research. Using surgical planning software called Otoplan, post-operative computed CT scans were used to determine the locations of intracochlear electrodes and their angle of insertion. The anatomy-based frequency bands were produced by Maestro 9.0 CI fitting software using the Otoplan data. Nonsense syllables with consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) recognition scores in quiet and noise (+5dB SNR) were compared at baseline, three, and six months after ABF. The vowels involved were /a, i, u/, while the consonants were voiced /b, d, g/ and voiceless /p, t, k/ plosives. Speech pieces were presented at 30 dB SL in a sound-treated room through a loudspeaker positioned at 0° azimuth.

Results: On average, the ABF maps shifted center frequency ranging from 0.46 semitones (0.04 octave) at (E12) to 23.94 semitones (1.99 octave) at (E1) as compared to the CBF maps. The mean vowel and consonant identification scores in quiet and in noise were significantly higher in ABF than in CBF (p<0.05) with a large effect size and the trend of improvement was seen with time. Voiced consonants had better scores than the voiceless consonants.

Conclusion: The results demonstrated improved perception of vowels and consonants, particularly for sounds containing voicing cues after using the ABF maps. The results also suggested that ABF could be more effective for voice detection in noise. Overall, the findings indicate that correcting place mismatch with an ABF map may improve speech perception, at least among experienced adult cochlear implant users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信