结构性污名与 LGBTQ+ 健康的科学现状:元分析证据、研究空白和未来方向》(Meta-Analytic Evidence, Research Gaps, and Future Directions)。

IF 21.4 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Micah R Lattanner, Sarah McKetta, John E Pachankis, Mark L Hatzenbuehler
{"title":"结构性污名与 LGBTQ+ 健康的科学现状:元分析证据、研究空白和未来方向》(Meta-Analytic Evidence, Research Gaps, and Future Directions)。","authors":"Micah R Lattanner, Sarah McKetta, John E Pachankis, Mark L Hatzenbuehler","doi":"10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071723-013336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While public health practitioners and scholars have long theorized that structural forms of stigma shape the health of disadvantaged groups, they have frequently bemoaned the lack of research on this topic. A unique opportunity to address this lacuna occurred in the past two decades, with the advent of dramatic changes in laws, social attitudes, and other structural manifestations of stigma surrounding LGBTQ+ individuals. In a review of this literature, we conducted a meta-analysis of LGBTQ+ structural stigma and health, finding an effect size comparable to several other well-established macrolevel risk factors for poor health (e.g., income inequality, racial residential segregation, neighborhood socioeconomic status). In addition, we enumerated a range of established methodological strategies that studies have used to strengthen inferences; these strategies include documenting result specificity (i.e., structural stigma is unrelated to the health of cisgender heterosexuals), addressing alternative explanations (e.g., social selection), and triangulating evidence across multiple methods, measures, and health outcomes. We offer suggestions for future research to advance this rapidly expanding field, including identifying sources of unexplained heterogeneity in the structural stigma-health association. Finally, we discuss implications for other marginalized groups and for public health interventions and policies to reduce LGBTQ+ health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50752,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State of the Science of Structural Stigma and LGBTQ+ Health: Meta-Analytic Evidence, Research Gaps, and Future Directions.\",\"authors\":\"Micah R Lattanner, Sarah McKetta, John E Pachankis, Mark L Hatzenbuehler\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071723-013336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While public health practitioners and scholars have long theorized that structural forms of stigma shape the health of disadvantaged groups, they have frequently bemoaned the lack of research on this topic. A unique opportunity to address this lacuna occurred in the past two decades, with the advent of dramatic changes in laws, social attitudes, and other structural manifestations of stigma surrounding LGBTQ+ individuals. In a review of this literature, we conducted a meta-analysis of LGBTQ+ structural stigma and health, finding an effect size comparable to several other well-established macrolevel risk factors for poor health (e.g., income inequality, racial residential segregation, neighborhood socioeconomic status). In addition, we enumerated a range of established methodological strategies that studies have used to strengthen inferences; these strategies include documenting result specificity (i.e., structural stigma is unrelated to the health of cisgender heterosexuals), addressing alternative explanations (e.g., social selection), and triangulating evidence across multiple methods, measures, and health outcomes. We offer suggestions for future research to advance this rapidly expanding field, including identifying sources of unexplained heterogeneity in the structural stigma-health association. Finally, we discuss implications for other marginalized groups and for public health interventions and policies to reduce LGBTQ+ health disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071723-013336\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071723-013336","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,公共卫生从业人员和学者一直认为,结构性的污名化形式会影响弱势群体的健康,但他们经常抱怨缺乏对这一主题的研究。在过去的二十年中,随着法律、社会态度以及其他围绕 LGBTQ+ 个人的污名化结构表现形式发生了巨大的变化,为解决这一空白问题提供了一个难得的机会。在对这些文献的回顾中,我们对 LGBTQ+ 的结构性污名与健康进行了荟萃分析,发现其影响大小与其他几个已被证实的宏观健康风险因素(如收入不平等、种族居住隔离、邻里社会经济地位)相当。此外,我们还列举了一系列既定的方法策略,这些策略被研究用来加强推论;这些策略包括记录结果的特异性(即结构性污名化与顺性别异性恋者的健康无关),解决替代解释(如社会选择),以及在多种方法、措施和健康结果之间三角测量证据。我们为未来的研究提出了建议,以推动这一领域的快速发展,包括确定结构性污名与健康关联中无法解释的异质性来源。最后,我们讨论了对其他边缘化群体以及减少 LGBTQ+ 健康差异的公共卫生干预措施和政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State of the Science of Structural Stigma and LGBTQ+ Health: Meta-Analytic Evidence, Research Gaps, and Future Directions.

While public health practitioners and scholars have long theorized that structural forms of stigma shape the health of disadvantaged groups, they have frequently bemoaned the lack of research on this topic. A unique opportunity to address this lacuna occurred in the past two decades, with the advent of dramatic changes in laws, social attitudes, and other structural manifestations of stigma surrounding LGBTQ+ individuals. In a review of this literature, we conducted a meta-analysis of LGBTQ+ structural stigma and health, finding an effect size comparable to several other well-established macrolevel risk factors for poor health (e.g., income inequality, racial residential segregation, neighborhood socioeconomic status). In addition, we enumerated a range of established methodological strategies that studies have used to strengthen inferences; these strategies include documenting result specificity (i.e., structural stigma is unrelated to the health of cisgender heterosexuals), addressing alternative explanations (e.g., social selection), and triangulating evidence across multiple methods, measures, and health outcomes. We offer suggestions for future research to advance this rapidly expanding field, including identifying sources of unexplained heterogeneity in the structural stigma-health association. Finally, we discuss implications for other marginalized groups and for public health interventions and policies to reduce LGBTQ+ health disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annual Review of Public Health
Annual Review of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
26.60
自引率
1.40%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Public Health has been a trusted publication in the field since its inception in 1980. It provides comprehensive coverage of important advancements in various areas of public health, such as epidemiology, biostatistics, environmental health, occupational health, social environment and behavior, health services, as well as public health practice and policy. In an effort to make the valuable research and information more accessible, the current volume has undergone a transformation. Previously, access to the articles was restricted, but now they are available to everyone through the Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program. This open access approach ensures that the knowledge and insights shared in these articles can reach a wider audience. Additionally, all the published articles are licensed under a CC BY license, allowing users to freely use, distribute, and build upon the content, while giving appropriate credit to the original authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信