Alice McDouall, Kelly Q Zhou, Guido Wassink, Anthony Davies, Laura Bennet, Alistair J Gunn, Joanne O Davidson
{"title":"对濒死胎羊缺血性脑损伤进行治疗性低温后缓慢复温缺乏额外益处。","authors":"Alice McDouall, Kelly Q Zhou, Guido Wassink, Anthony Davies, Laura Bennet, Alistair J Gunn, Joanne O Davidson","doi":"10.1113/JP287453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal rate of rewarming after therapeutic hypothermia is unclear. Slow rewarming may reduce cardiovascular instability and rebound seizures, but there is little controlled evidence to support this. The present study aimed to determine whether slow rewarming can improve neuroprotection after 72 h of hypothermia. Fetal sheep (0.85 gestation) received sham occlusion (n = 8) or 30 min of global cerebral ischaemia followed by normothermia (n = 7), or hypothermia from 3 to 72 h with either fast, spontaneous rewarming within 1 h (n = 8) or slow rewarming at 0.5°C h<sup>-1</sup> over 10 h (n = 8). Hypothermia improved EEG and spectral edge recovery, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia reduced the number of seizures, with no significant difference in seizure activity between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia improved neuronal survival in the cortex, CA1, CA3, CA4 and dentate gyrus regions of the hippocampus, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia attenuated microglia counts in the cortex, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. The rate of rewarming after a clinically relevant duration of hypothermia did not affect neurophysiological recovery, neuronal survival or attenuation of microglia after global cerebral ischaemia in term-equivalent fetal sheep. KEY POINTS: The rate of rewarming after 72 h of hypothermia did not affect recovery of EEG or spectral edge. There was no difference in the occurrence of seizures as a result of the rate of rewarming after hypothermia. The rate of rewarming after 72 h of hypothermia did not affect neuronal survival in the cortex or hippocampus.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lack of additional benefit from slow rewarming after therapeutic hypothermia for ischaemic brain injury in near-term fetal sheep.\",\"authors\":\"Alice McDouall, Kelly Q Zhou, Guido Wassink, Anthony Davies, Laura Bennet, Alistair J Gunn, Joanne O Davidson\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/JP287453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The optimal rate of rewarming after therapeutic hypothermia is unclear. Slow rewarming may reduce cardiovascular instability and rebound seizures, but there is little controlled evidence to support this. The present study aimed to determine whether slow rewarming can improve neuroprotection after 72 h of hypothermia. Fetal sheep (0.85 gestation) received sham occlusion (n = 8) or 30 min of global cerebral ischaemia followed by normothermia (n = 7), or hypothermia from 3 to 72 h with either fast, spontaneous rewarming within 1 h (n = 8) or slow rewarming at 0.5°C h<sup>-1</sup> over 10 h (n = 8). Hypothermia improved EEG and spectral edge recovery, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia reduced the number of seizures, with no significant difference in seizure activity between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia improved neuronal survival in the cortex, CA1, CA3, CA4 and dentate gyrus regions of the hippocampus, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia attenuated microglia counts in the cortex, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. The rate of rewarming after a clinically relevant duration of hypothermia did not affect neurophysiological recovery, neuronal survival or attenuation of microglia after global cerebral ischaemia in term-equivalent fetal sheep. KEY POINTS: The rate of rewarming after 72 h of hypothermia did not affect recovery of EEG or spectral edge. There was no difference in the occurrence of seizures as a result of the rate of rewarming after hypothermia. The rate of rewarming after 72 h of hypothermia did not affect neuronal survival in the cortex or hippocampus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP287453\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP287453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lack of additional benefit from slow rewarming after therapeutic hypothermia for ischaemic brain injury in near-term fetal sheep.
The optimal rate of rewarming after therapeutic hypothermia is unclear. Slow rewarming may reduce cardiovascular instability and rebound seizures, but there is little controlled evidence to support this. The present study aimed to determine whether slow rewarming can improve neuroprotection after 72 h of hypothermia. Fetal sheep (0.85 gestation) received sham occlusion (n = 8) or 30 min of global cerebral ischaemia followed by normothermia (n = 7), or hypothermia from 3 to 72 h with either fast, spontaneous rewarming within 1 h (n = 8) or slow rewarming at 0.5°C h-1 over 10 h (n = 8). Hypothermia improved EEG and spectral edge recovery, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia reduced the number of seizures, with no significant difference in seizure activity between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia improved neuronal survival in the cortex, CA1, CA3, CA4 and dentate gyrus regions of the hippocampus, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. Hypothermia attenuated microglia counts in the cortex, with no significant difference between fast and slow rewarming. The rate of rewarming after a clinically relevant duration of hypothermia did not affect neurophysiological recovery, neuronal survival or attenuation of microglia after global cerebral ischaemia in term-equivalent fetal sheep. KEY POINTS: The rate of rewarming after 72 h of hypothermia did not affect recovery of EEG or spectral edge. There was no difference in the occurrence of seizures as a result of the rate of rewarming after hypothermia. The rate of rewarming after 72 h of hypothermia did not affect neuronal survival in the cortex or hippocampus.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew.
The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.