脑外伤患者工作记忆多成分模型的结果:批判性回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bar Lambez, Eli Vakil, Philippe Azouvi, Claire Vallat-Azouvi
{"title":"脑外伤患者工作记忆多成分模型的结果:批判性回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Bar Lambez, Eli Vakil, Philippe Azouvi, Claire Vallat-Azouvi","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) often leads to cognitive impairments, particularly regarding working memory (WM). This meta-analysis aims to examine the impact of TBI on WM, taking into account moderating factors which has received little attention in previous research, such as severity of injury, the different domains of Baddeley's multi-component model, and the interaction between these two factors, as well as the interaction with other domains of executive functions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis searched Google Scholar, PubMed, and PsycNET for studies with objective WM measures. Multiple meta-analyses were performed to compare the effects of TBI severity on different WM components. Twenty-four English, peer-reviewed articles, mostly cross-sectional were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TBI significantly impairs general WM and all Baddeley's model components, most notably the Central Executive (<i>d</i>' = 0.74). Severity categories, mild-moderate and moderate-severe, were identified. Impairment was found across severities, with \"moderate-severe\" demonstrating the largest effect size (<i>d'</i> = 0.81). Individuals with moderate-severe TBI showed greater impairments in the Central Executive and Episodic Buffer compared to those with mild-moderate injury, whereas no such differences were found for the Phonological Loop and Visuospatial Sketchpad.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings enhance our understanding of WM deficits in varying severities of TBI, highlighting the importance of assessing and treating WM in clinical practice and intervention planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working memory multicomponent model outcomes in individuals with traumatic brain injury: Critical review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bar Lambez, Eli Vakil, Philippe Azouvi, Claire Vallat-Azouvi\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1355617724000468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) often leads to cognitive impairments, particularly regarding working memory (WM). This meta-analysis aims to examine the impact of TBI on WM, taking into account moderating factors which has received little attention in previous research, such as severity of injury, the different domains of Baddeley's multi-component model, and the interaction between these two factors, as well as the interaction with other domains of executive functions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis searched Google Scholar, PubMed, and PsycNET for studies with objective WM measures. Multiple meta-analyses were performed to compare the effects of TBI severity on different WM components. Twenty-four English, peer-reviewed articles, mostly cross-sectional were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TBI significantly impairs general WM and all Baddeley's model components, most notably the Central Executive (<i>d</i>' = 0.74). Severity categories, mild-moderate and moderate-severe, were identified. Impairment was found across severities, with \\\"moderate-severe\\\" demonstrating the largest effect size (<i>d'</i> = 0.81). Individuals with moderate-severe TBI showed greater impairments in the Central Executive and Episodic Buffer compared to those with mild-moderate injury, whereas no such differences were found for the Phonological Loop and Visuospatial Sketchpad.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings enhance our understanding of WM deficits in varying severities of TBI, highlighting the importance of assessing and treating WM in clinical practice and intervention planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000468\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000468","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)通常会导致认知障碍,尤其是工作记忆(WM)方面的障碍。本荟萃分析旨在研究创伤性脑损伤对工作记忆的影响,同时考虑到以往研究中很少关注的调节因素,如受伤严重程度、巴德利多成分模型的不同领域、这两个因素之间的相互作用以及与其他执行功能领域的相互作用:根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南,系统综述和荟萃分析检索了谷歌学术、PubMed 和 PsycNET 中有关客观 WM 测量的研究。为了比较创伤性脑损伤严重程度对不同 WM 成分的影响,我们进行了多项荟萃分析。共纳入了 24 篇经同行评审的英文文章,其中大部分为横断面文章:结果:创伤性脑损伤严重损害了一般 WM 和 Baddeley 模型的所有组成部分,尤其是中央执行器(d' = 0.74)。严重程度分为轻度-中度和中度-严重。在不同严重程度的患者中,"中度严重 "的影响最大(d' = 0.81)。与轻中度创伤相比,中重度创伤后遗症患者在中央执行器和外显缓冲器方面表现出更大的损伤,而在语音环路和视觉空间素描板方面则没有发现这种差异:这些发现加深了我们对不同严重程度的创伤性脑损伤所导致的WM缺陷的理解,突出了在临床实践和干预计划中评估和治疗WM的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Working memory multicomponent model outcomes in individuals with traumatic brain injury: Critical review and meta-analysis.

Objective: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) often leads to cognitive impairments, particularly regarding working memory (WM). This meta-analysis aims to examine the impact of TBI on WM, taking into account moderating factors which has received little attention in previous research, such as severity of injury, the different domains of Baddeley's multi-component model, and the interaction between these two factors, as well as the interaction with other domains of executive functions.

Method: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis searched Google Scholar, PubMed, and PsycNET for studies with objective WM measures. Multiple meta-analyses were performed to compare the effects of TBI severity on different WM components. Twenty-four English, peer-reviewed articles, mostly cross-sectional were included.

Results: TBI significantly impairs general WM and all Baddeley's model components, most notably the Central Executive (d' = 0.74). Severity categories, mild-moderate and moderate-severe, were identified. Impairment was found across severities, with "moderate-severe" demonstrating the largest effect size (d' = 0.81). Individuals with moderate-severe TBI showed greater impairments in the Central Executive and Episodic Buffer compared to those with mild-moderate injury, whereas no such differences were found for the Phonological Loop and Visuospatial Sketchpad.

Conclusions: These findings enhance our understanding of WM deficits in varying severities of TBI, highlighting the importance of assessing and treating WM in clinical practice and intervention planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信