知识转化干预措施,提高儿科康复专业人员对循证实践的接受度:系统回顾。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Raquel Lazarowitz, Doaa Taqi, Cassandra Lee, Jill Boruff, Kimberly McBain, Annette Majnemer, André Bussières, Noémi Dahan-Oliel
{"title":"知识转化干预措施,提高儿科康复专业人员对循证实践的接受度:系统回顾。","authors":"Raquel Lazarowitz, Doaa Taqi, Cassandra Lee, Jill Boruff, Kimberly McBain, Annette Majnemer, André Bussières, Noémi Dahan-Oliel","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2024.2421854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To summarize evidence on effective knowledge translation (KT) interventions to increase evidence-based practice among pediatric rehabilitation professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRISMA 2020 Checklist was used for search, selection, and data extraction. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessed quality, while the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care described KT interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 7233 records; 29 met the inclusion criteria. Two studies used educational materials alone. The remaining 27 studies used multifaceted KT interventions, combining education with local opinion leaders or knowledge brokers (<i>n</i> = 12), continuous quality improvement (<i>n</i> = 11), reminders (<i>n</i> = 6), communities of practice (<i>n</i> = 6), provider performance monitoring (<i>n</i> = 5), audit and feedback (<i>n</i> = 2), information and communication technology (<i>n</i> = 2), clinical practice guideline (<i>n</i> = 1), or routine patient-reported outcome measures (<i>n</i> = 1). Significant improvements in knowledge (<i>n</i> = 10), skills (<i>n</i> = 6), adherence and use (<i>n</i> = 4), perceptions (<i>n</i> = 3), intentions of use (<i>n</i> = 2), confidence level (<i>n</i> = 1), beliefs and attitudes (<i>n</i> = 3), and professional behavior change (<i>n</i> = 2) were reported. Included studies had a moderate to high-risk bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Educational and local opinion leaders were common in multifaceted KT interventions, the majority resulting in improved professional knowledge, skills, attitudes and beliefs, and behaviors. Rigorous study designs are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge Translation Interventions to Increase the Uptake of Evidence-Based Practice Among Pediatric Rehabilitation Professionals: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Raquel Lazarowitz, Doaa Taqi, Cassandra Lee, Jill Boruff, Kimberly McBain, Annette Majnemer, André Bussières, Noémi Dahan-Oliel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01942638.2024.2421854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To summarize evidence on effective knowledge translation (KT) interventions to increase evidence-based practice among pediatric rehabilitation professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRISMA 2020 Checklist was used for search, selection, and data extraction. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessed quality, while the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care described KT interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 7233 records; 29 met the inclusion criteria. Two studies used educational materials alone. The remaining 27 studies used multifaceted KT interventions, combining education with local opinion leaders or knowledge brokers (<i>n</i> = 12), continuous quality improvement (<i>n</i> = 11), reminders (<i>n</i> = 6), communities of practice (<i>n</i> = 6), provider performance monitoring (<i>n</i> = 5), audit and feedback (<i>n</i> = 2), information and communication technology (<i>n</i> = 2), clinical practice guideline (<i>n</i> = 1), or routine patient-reported outcome measures (<i>n</i> = 1). Significant improvements in knowledge (<i>n</i> = 10), skills (<i>n</i> = 6), adherence and use (<i>n</i> = 4), perceptions (<i>n</i> = 3), intentions of use (<i>n</i> = 2), confidence level (<i>n</i> = 1), beliefs and attitudes (<i>n</i> = 3), and professional behavior change (<i>n</i> = 2) were reported. Included studies had a moderate to high-risk bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Educational and local opinion leaders were common in multifaceted KT interventions, the majority resulting in improved professional knowledge, skills, attitudes and beliefs, and behaviors. Rigorous study designs are needed to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2024.2421854\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2024.2421854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:总结有关有效知识转化(KT)干预的证据,以提高儿科康复专业人员的循证实践能力:方法:采用PRISMA 2020核对表进行检索、选择和数据提取。混合方法评估工具(Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool)对质量进行了评估,而科克伦有效实践与护理组织(Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care)对知识转化干预措施进行了描述:我们的搜索共获得 7233 条记录,其中 29 条符合纳入标准。两项研究仅使用了教育材料。其余 27 项研究使用了多方面的 KT 干预措施,将教育与当地意见领袖或知识经纪人(12 项)、持续质量改进(11 项)、提醒(6 项)、实践社区(6 项)、提供者绩效监测(5 项)、审计和反馈(2 项)、信息和通信技术(2 项)、临床实践指南(1 项)或常规患者报告结果测量(1 项)相结合。据报道,在知识(10 例)、技能(6 例)、坚持和使用(4 例)、认知(3 例)、使用意向(2 例)、信心水平(1 例)、信念和态度(3 例)以及职业行为改变(2 例)方面均有显著改善。所纳入的研究存在中度至高风险偏倚:教育和地方舆论领袖在多方面的知识、态度和行为干预中很常见,大多数干预都能改善专业知识、技能、态度、信念和行为。需要严格的研究设计来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge Translation Interventions to Increase the Uptake of Evidence-Based Practice Among Pediatric Rehabilitation Professionals: A Systematic Review.

Aims: To summarize evidence on effective knowledge translation (KT) interventions to increase evidence-based practice among pediatric rehabilitation professionals.

Methods: The PRISMA 2020 Checklist was used for search, selection, and data extraction. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessed quality, while the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care described KT interventions.

Results: Our search yielded 7233 records; 29 met the inclusion criteria. Two studies used educational materials alone. The remaining 27 studies used multifaceted KT interventions, combining education with local opinion leaders or knowledge brokers (n = 12), continuous quality improvement (n = 11), reminders (n = 6), communities of practice (n = 6), provider performance monitoring (n = 5), audit and feedback (n = 2), information and communication technology (n = 2), clinical practice guideline (n = 1), or routine patient-reported outcome measures (n = 1). Significant improvements in knowledge (n = 10), skills (n = 6), adherence and use (n = 4), perceptions (n = 3), intentions of use (n = 2), confidence level (n = 1), beliefs and attitudes (n = 3), and professional behavior change (n = 2) were reported. Included studies had a moderate to high-risk bias.

Conclusion: Educational and local opinion leaders were common in multifaceted KT interventions, the majority resulting in improved professional knowledge, skills, attitudes and beliefs, and behaviors. Rigorous study designs are needed to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信