围绕姑息关怀、重病和生命终结经历的个人叙事中的共同意义模式。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Marjolein Matthys , Kenneth Chambaere , Benedicte Deforche , Joachim Cohen , Luc Deliens , Kim Beernaert , Leen Van Brussel , Naomi Dhollander
{"title":"围绕姑息关怀、重病和生命终结经历的个人叙事中的共同意义模式。","authors":"Marjolein Matthys ,&nbsp;Kenneth Chambaere ,&nbsp;Benedicte Deforche ,&nbsp;Joachim Cohen ,&nbsp;Luc Deliens ,&nbsp;Kim Beernaert ,&nbsp;Leen Van Brussel ,&nbsp;Naomi Dhollander","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prior observations of persistent public misconceptions and negative beliefs surrounding palliative care have led to extensive calls for public education on palliative care. Yet, the development of effective initiatives to improve public perceptions of palliative care is still hindered by a lack of research providing a deeper, contextualized understanding of the way people perceive and give meaning to palliative care. This study therefore set out to explore patterns of shared meaning across personal narratives surrounding experiences with palliative care, serious illness, and the end of life. These narratives were collected during a broad public engagement initiative on palliative care in Flanders, Belgium which included a call to share personal stories surrounding palliative care (which 72 persons did) as well as a Citizens' Forum in which 24 persons engaged in live conversations on palliative care. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze the personal narratives and yielded four axes of meaning: 1) ‘Sense of Support’, describing feeling supported or abandoned on multiple levels with key elements of open and empathetic communication, being informed and listened to; 2) ‘Being-in-Time’, incorporating a renewed sense of temporality and the weight of uncertain prognosis; 3) ‘Constituting a Sense of Self while Coping with Life-Threatening Illness’, involving concerns surrounding role adjustments and posthumous reputation; and 4) ‘Going Through the Process of Dying’, unique to bereaved individuals' narratives, highlighting the importance of being informed during the dying process and honoring the wishes of the dying person. Together, these axes illuminate how both positive and stigmatized views on palliative care are shaped by broader patterns of meaning attribution, deeply ingrained in personal and social contexts. The identified narrative elements can play a crucial role in improving the content, reach, and impact of future public communication and education on palliative care, effectively enhancing public receptivity and engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"363 ","pages":"Article 117473"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of shared meaning across personal narratives surrounding experiences with palliative care, serious illness, and the end of life\",\"authors\":\"Marjolein Matthys ,&nbsp;Kenneth Chambaere ,&nbsp;Benedicte Deforche ,&nbsp;Joachim Cohen ,&nbsp;Luc Deliens ,&nbsp;Kim Beernaert ,&nbsp;Leen Van Brussel ,&nbsp;Naomi Dhollander\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Prior observations of persistent public misconceptions and negative beliefs surrounding palliative care have led to extensive calls for public education on palliative care. Yet, the development of effective initiatives to improve public perceptions of palliative care is still hindered by a lack of research providing a deeper, contextualized understanding of the way people perceive and give meaning to palliative care. This study therefore set out to explore patterns of shared meaning across personal narratives surrounding experiences with palliative care, serious illness, and the end of life. These narratives were collected during a broad public engagement initiative on palliative care in Flanders, Belgium which included a call to share personal stories surrounding palliative care (which 72 persons did) as well as a Citizens' Forum in which 24 persons engaged in live conversations on palliative care. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze the personal narratives and yielded four axes of meaning: 1) ‘Sense of Support’, describing feeling supported or abandoned on multiple levels with key elements of open and empathetic communication, being informed and listened to; 2) ‘Being-in-Time’, incorporating a renewed sense of temporality and the weight of uncertain prognosis; 3) ‘Constituting a Sense of Self while Coping with Life-Threatening Illness’, involving concerns surrounding role adjustments and posthumous reputation; and 4) ‘Going Through the Process of Dying’, unique to bereaved individuals' narratives, highlighting the importance of being informed during the dying process and honoring the wishes of the dying person. Together, these axes illuminate how both positive and stigmatized views on palliative care are shaped by broader patterns of meaning attribution, deeply ingrained in personal and social contexts. The identified narrative elements can play a crucial role in improving the content, reach, and impact of future public communication and education on palliative care, effectively enhancing public receptivity and engagement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"363 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624009274\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624009274","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

此前,公众对姑息关怀一直存在误解和负面看法,这导致了对姑息关怀公众教育的广泛呼吁。然而,由于缺乏对人们如何看待姑息关怀并赋予姑息关怀意义的更深入、更有背景的理解的研究,制定有效措施以改善公众对姑息关怀的看法仍然受到阻碍。因此,本研究旨在探索围绕姑息关怀、重病和生命终结经历的个人叙述中的共同意义模式。这些叙述是在比利时佛兰德斯关于姑息关怀的广泛公众参与活动中收集的,该活动包括号召人们分享关于姑息关怀的个人故事(有 72 人参与了该活动),以及举办公民论坛,有 24 人参与了关于姑息关怀的现场对话。反思性主题分析被用来分析个人叙述,并得出了四个意义轴:1)"支持感",描述了在多个层面上被支持或被遗弃的感觉,其中的关键要素包括开放和富有同情心的沟通、知情和倾听;2)"时间感",包含了一种新的时间感和不确定预后的沉重感;3)"构成一种支持感",描述了在多个层面上被支持或被遗弃的感觉,其中的关键要素包括开放和富有同情心的沟通、知情和倾听;3)"在应对危及生命的疾病时建立自我意识",涉及对角色调整和身后声誉的关注;以及 4)"经历临终过程",这是丧亲者的独特叙述,强调了在临终过程中知情和尊重临终者意愿的重要性。这些轴线共同揭示了姑息关怀的积极观点和污名化观点是如何被更广泛的意义归因模式所塑造的,这些意义归因模式在个人和社会环境中根深蒂固。所确定的叙事要素可在改善未来姑息关怀公众宣传和教育的内容、覆盖面和影响力方面发挥关键作用,有效提高公众的接受度和参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of shared meaning across personal narratives surrounding experiences with palliative care, serious illness, and the end of life
Prior observations of persistent public misconceptions and negative beliefs surrounding palliative care have led to extensive calls for public education on palliative care. Yet, the development of effective initiatives to improve public perceptions of palliative care is still hindered by a lack of research providing a deeper, contextualized understanding of the way people perceive and give meaning to palliative care. This study therefore set out to explore patterns of shared meaning across personal narratives surrounding experiences with palliative care, serious illness, and the end of life. These narratives were collected during a broad public engagement initiative on palliative care in Flanders, Belgium which included a call to share personal stories surrounding palliative care (which 72 persons did) as well as a Citizens' Forum in which 24 persons engaged in live conversations on palliative care. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze the personal narratives and yielded four axes of meaning: 1) ‘Sense of Support’, describing feeling supported or abandoned on multiple levels with key elements of open and empathetic communication, being informed and listened to; 2) ‘Being-in-Time’, incorporating a renewed sense of temporality and the weight of uncertain prognosis; 3) ‘Constituting a Sense of Self while Coping with Life-Threatening Illness’, involving concerns surrounding role adjustments and posthumous reputation; and 4) ‘Going Through the Process of Dying’, unique to bereaved individuals' narratives, highlighting the importance of being informed during the dying process and honoring the wishes of the dying person. Together, these axes illuminate how both positive and stigmatized views on palliative care are shaped by broader patterns of meaning attribution, deeply ingrained in personal and social contexts. The identified narrative elements can play a crucial role in improving the content, reach, and impact of future public communication and education on palliative care, effectively enhancing public receptivity and engagement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信