日本公务员的时间型和业余体育活动:爱知县工人队列研究的横断面分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ryusei Okegawa, Yupeng He, Masaaki Matsunaga, May Thet Khine, Yuanying Li, Tsuyoshi Kitajima, Hiroshi Yatsuya, Atsuhiko Ota
{"title":"日本公务员的时间型和业余体育活动:爱知县工人队列研究的横断面分析。","authors":"Ryusei Okegawa, Yupeng He, Masaaki Matsunaga, May Thet Khine, Yuanying Li, Tsuyoshi Kitajima, Hiroshi Yatsuya, Atsuhiko Ota","doi":"10.1186/s13690-024-01440-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between chronotype and leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) remains unclear. We investigated the difference in regular LTPA and for a sufficient duration between those with evening-type (ET) and morning-type chronotypes (MT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using the data of the Aichi Workers' Cohort Study. It included 3,221 men (mean [standard deviation] age: 45.0 [11.6] years) and 1,294 women (39.8 [11.2] years). Chronotypes were determined with the reduced version of the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire. We calculated the metabolic equivalents (METs) consumed per week based on the four types of LTPA: strolling, brisk walking, light- and moderate-intensity PA, and vigorous-intensity PA. Regular LTPA and for a sufficient duration was defined as doing once or more per week and for 30 min or longer per session, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was conducted separately by sex to calculate odds ratios of ET for regular LTPA and for a sufficient duration, adjusted for age and other factors, for each type of LTPA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ET men consumed fewer total METs per week than MT men (p < .001), although this pattern is not found in women. Compared to MT men, ET men were less likely to be engaged in regular LTPA in all types of LTPA (prevalence and adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: strolling: 39.1% vs. 28.7%, 0.685 [0.524-0.895]; brisk walking: 23.9% vs. 14.4%, 0.639 [0.454-0.899]; light- and moderate-intensity PA: 15.4% vs. 8.4%, 0.613 [0.404-0.929]; vigorous-intensity PA: 21.4% vs. 16.8%, 0.715 [0.518-0.989]). They were less likely to spend a sufficient duration in brisk walking (25.9% vs. 16.5%, 0.635 [0.461-0.875]), light- and moderate-intensity PA (37.1% vs. 26.8%, 0.684 [0.521-0.899]), and vigorous-intensity PA (35.3% vs. 35.8%, 0.741 [0.568-0.968]). Compared with MT women, ET women were less likely to be engaged in strolling (30.5% vs. 22.2%, 0.629 [0.398-0.995]), and less likely to spend a sufficient duration in light- and moderate-intensity PA (27.3% vs. 15.3%, 0.561 [0.335-0.937]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ET was inversely associated with LTPA in men and partly in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"82 1","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronotype and leisure-time physical activity among civil servants in Japan: a cross-sectional analysis of the Aichi workers' cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Ryusei Okegawa, Yupeng He, Masaaki Matsunaga, May Thet Khine, Yuanying Li, Tsuyoshi Kitajima, Hiroshi Yatsuya, Atsuhiko Ota\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13690-024-01440-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between chronotype and leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) remains unclear. We investigated the difference in regular LTPA and for a sufficient duration between those with evening-type (ET) and morning-type chronotypes (MT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using the data of the Aichi Workers' Cohort Study. It included 3,221 men (mean [standard deviation] age: 45.0 [11.6] years) and 1,294 women (39.8 [11.2] years). Chronotypes were determined with the reduced version of the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire. We calculated the metabolic equivalents (METs) consumed per week based on the four types of LTPA: strolling, brisk walking, light- and moderate-intensity PA, and vigorous-intensity PA. Regular LTPA and for a sufficient duration was defined as doing once or more per week and for 30 min or longer per session, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was conducted separately by sex to calculate odds ratios of ET for regular LTPA and for a sufficient duration, adjusted for age and other factors, for each type of LTPA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ET men consumed fewer total METs per week than MT men (p < .001), although this pattern is not found in women. Compared to MT men, ET men were less likely to be engaged in regular LTPA in all types of LTPA (prevalence and adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: strolling: 39.1% vs. 28.7%, 0.685 [0.524-0.895]; brisk walking: 23.9% vs. 14.4%, 0.639 [0.454-0.899]; light- and moderate-intensity PA: 15.4% vs. 8.4%, 0.613 [0.404-0.929]; vigorous-intensity PA: 21.4% vs. 16.8%, 0.715 [0.518-0.989]). They were less likely to spend a sufficient duration in brisk walking (25.9% vs. 16.5%, 0.635 [0.461-0.875]), light- and moderate-intensity PA (37.1% vs. 26.8%, 0.684 [0.521-0.899]), and vigorous-intensity PA (35.3% vs. 35.8%, 0.741 [0.568-0.968]). Compared with MT women, ET women were less likely to be engaged in strolling (30.5% vs. 22.2%, 0.629 [0.398-0.995]), and less likely to spend a sufficient duration in light- and moderate-intensity PA (27.3% vs. 15.3%, 0.561 [0.335-0.937]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ET was inversely associated with LTPA in men and partly in women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546544/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01440-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01440-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:时型与闲暇时间体力活动(LTPA)之间的关系仍不清楚。我们研究了黄昏型(ET)和清晨型(MT)时型的人在经常性LTPA和持续足够时间方面的差异:我们利用爱知县工人队列研究的数据进行了横断面分析。其中包括 3,221 名男性(平均年龄 [标准差]:45.0 [11.6] 岁)和 1,294 名女性(39.8 [11.2] 岁)。我们使用简化版的 "晨醒-活力问卷 "确定了他们的 "时型"。我们根据漫步、快走、轻度和中度运动强度以及剧烈运动强度这四种类型的低强度运动来计算每周消耗的代谢当量(METs)。定期和持续时间足够长的LTPA分别被定义为每周进行一次或更多次,以及每次持续30分钟或更长时间。在对年龄和其他因素进行调整后,按性别分别进行了逻辑回归分析,以计算每种类型的LTPA中,ET与经常性LTPA和持续时间足够长的几率比:结果:ET 男性每周消耗的总 METs 少于 MT 男性(P<0.05):ET与男性的LTPA成反比,部分与女性的LTPA成反比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chronotype and leisure-time physical activity among civil servants in Japan: a cross-sectional analysis of the Aichi workers' cohort study.

Background: The association between chronotype and leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) remains unclear. We investigated the difference in regular LTPA and for a sufficient duration between those with evening-type (ET) and morning-type chronotypes (MT).

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using the data of the Aichi Workers' Cohort Study. It included 3,221 men (mean [standard deviation] age: 45.0 [11.6] years) and 1,294 women (39.8 [11.2] years). Chronotypes were determined with the reduced version of the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire. We calculated the metabolic equivalents (METs) consumed per week based on the four types of LTPA: strolling, brisk walking, light- and moderate-intensity PA, and vigorous-intensity PA. Regular LTPA and for a sufficient duration was defined as doing once or more per week and for 30 min or longer per session, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was conducted separately by sex to calculate odds ratios of ET for regular LTPA and for a sufficient duration, adjusted for age and other factors, for each type of LTPA.

Results: ET men consumed fewer total METs per week than MT men (p < .001), although this pattern is not found in women. Compared to MT men, ET men were less likely to be engaged in regular LTPA in all types of LTPA (prevalence and adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: strolling: 39.1% vs. 28.7%, 0.685 [0.524-0.895]; brisk walking: 23.9% vs. 14.4%, 0.639 [0.454-0.899]; light- and moderate-intensity PA: 15.4% vs. 8.4%, 0.613 [0.404-0.929]; vigorous-intensity PA: 21.4% vs. 16.8%, 0.715 [0.518-0.989]). They were less likely to spend a sufficient duration in brisk walking (25.9% vs. 16.5%, 0.635 [0.461-0.875]), light- and moderate-intensity PA (37.1% vs. 26.8%, 0.684 [0.521-0.899]), and vigorous-intensity PA (35.3% vs. 35.8%, 0.741 [0.568-0.968]). Compared with MT women, ET women were less likely to be engaged in strolling (30.5% vs. 22.2%, 0.629 [0.398-0.995]), and less likely to spend a sufficient duration in light- and moderate-intensity PA (27.3% vs. 15.3%, 0.561 [0.335-0.937]).

Conclusions: ET was inversely associated with LTPA in men and partly in women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信