迈向更安全的空间:学术医学中心受训人员心理安全实证调查》。

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S477654
Laurence M Boitet, Katherine A Meese, Katherine L Sweeney, Norman R Estes, Megan M Hays, Christine Loyd, David A Rogers
{"title":"迈向更安全的空间:学术医学中心受训人员心理安全实证调查》。","authors":"Laurence M Boitet, Katherine A Meese, Katherine L Sweeney, Norman R Estes, Megan M Hays, Christine Loyd, David A Rogers","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S477654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Psychological safety is critical for fostering well-being. Integral to the mission of academic institutions, trainees are among the most vulnerable to negative workplace experiences, calling for a need to understand factors that contribute to psychological safety in this population. Our objective is to empirically explore trainee psychological safety to inform best practices for training environments.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey was used to capture organizational, interpersonal, and individual factors, as well as demographic information in graduate, postdoctoral, medical, resident, and fellow trainees. Descriptive statistics, multivariate ordinal logistic regression, and dominance analyses were used to understand psychological safety and the predictors that explained the majority of the variance in its statistical model.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Gender minorities and those who suppressed their race information were less likely to feel psychologically safe. Psychological safety was predominately explained by senses of belonging, recognition, and respect. Notably, trust and confidence in supervisor emerged as a pivotal factor influencing belonging and respect, whereas organizational support played a crucial role in fostering recognition and belonging. Intriguingly, clarity in role expectations and autonomy were positively correlated with recognition.</p><p><strong>Originality: </strong>Our findings highlight the interplay between organizational, interpersonal, and individual dynamics shaping psychological safety. Importantly, those who suppress their race as well as female or gender minorities are disproportionally prone to feeling unsafe. We further elucidate role clarity and autonomy as important factors in achieving a sense of recognition. We suggest programs prioritize development beyond technical competencies, recognizing trainees as key stakeholders in the cultivation of positive culture within academic environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"15 ","pages":"1079-1092"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Safer Spaces: An Empirical Investigation of Trainee Psychological Safety Within Academic Medical Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Laurence M Boitet, Katherine A Meese, Katherine L Sweeney, Norman R Estes, Megan M Hays, Christine Loyd, David A Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S477654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Psychological safety is critical for fostering well-being. Integral to the mission of academic institutions, trainees are among the most vulnerable to negative workplace experiences, calling for a need to understand factors that contribute to psychological safety in this population. Our objective is to empirically explore trainee psychological safety to inform best practices for training environments.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey was used to capture organizational, interpersonal, and individual factors, as well as demographic information in graduate, postdoctoral, medical, resident, and fellow trainees. Descriptive statistics, multivariate ordinal logistic regression, and dominance analyses were used to understand psychological safety and the predictors that explained the majority of the variance in its statistical model.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Gender minorities and those who suppressed their race information were less likely to feel psychologically safe. Psychological safety was predominately explained by senses of belonging, recognition, and respect. Notably, trust and confidence in supervisor emerged as a pivotal factor influencing belonging and respect, whereas organizational support played a crucial role in fostering recognition and belonging. Intriguingly, clarity in role expectations and autonomy were positively correlated with recognition.</p><p><strong>Originality: </strong>Our findings highlight the interplay between organizational, interpersonal, and individual dynamics shaping psychological safety. Importantly, those who suppress their race as well as female or gender minorities are disproportionally prone to feeling unsafe. We further elucidate role clarity and autonomy as important factors in achieving a sense of recognition. We suggest programs prioritize development beyond technical competencies, recognizing trainees as key stakeholders in the cultivation of positive culture within academic environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1079-1092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556241/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S477654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S477654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心理安全对于促进身心健康至关重要。作为学术机构的重要使命,受训人员是最容易受到负面工作场所经历影响的群体之一,因此有必要了解影响受训人员心理安全的因素。我们的目标是通过实证研究探讨受训人员的心理安全问题,为培训环境的最佳实践提供参考:设计:我们采用了一项调查来获取组织、人际和个人因素,以及研究生、博士后、医学、住院医师和研究员学员的人口统计学信息。通过描述性统计、多变量序数逻辑回归和优势分析来了解心理安全及其统计模型中能解释大部分方差的预测因素:性别少数群体和压抑自己种族信息的人较少有心理安全感。心理安全感主要由归属感、认可感和尊重感来解释。值得注意的是,对上司的信任和信心是影响归属感和尊重感的关键因素,而组织支持在促进认可感和归属感方面起着至关重要的作用。耐人寻味的是,角色期望的明确性和自主性与认可度呈正相关:我们的研究结果凸显了组织、人际和个人动力之间的相互作用对心理安全的影响。重要的是,那些压抑自己种族的人以及女性或性别少数群体更容易感到不安全。我们进一步阐明了角色明确性和自主性是获得认同感的重要因素。我们建议项目优先发展技术能力以外的能力,承认受训者是在学术环境中培养积极文化的关键利益相关者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Safer Spaces: An Empirical Investigation of Trainee Psychological Safety Within Academic Medical Centers.

Purpose: Psychological safety is critical for fostering well-being. Integral to the mission of academic institutions, trainees are among the most vulnerable to negative workplace experiences, calling for a need to understand factors that contribute to psychological safety in this population. Our objective is to empirically explore trainee psychological safety to inform best practices for training environments.

Design: A survey was used to capture organizational, interpersonal, and individual factors, as well as demographic information in graduate, postdoctoral, medical, resident, and fellow trainees. Descriptive statistics, multivariate ordinal logistic regression, and dominance analyses were used to understand psychological safety and the predictors that explained the majority of the variance in its statistical model.

Findings: Gender minorities and those who suppressed their race information were less likely to feel psychologically safe. Psychological safety was predominately explained by senses of belonging, recognition, and respect. Notably, trust and confidence in supervisor emerged as a pivotal factor influencing belonging and respect, whereas organizational support played a crucial role in fostering recognition and belonging. Intriguingly, clarity in role expectations and autonomy were positively correlated with recognition.

Originality: Our findings highlight the interplay between organizational, interpersonal, and individual dynamics shaping psychological safety. Importantly, those who suppress their race as well as female or gender minorities are disproportionally prone to feeling unsafe. We further elucidate role clarity and autonomy as important factors in achieving a sense of recognition. We suggest programs prioritize development beyond technical competencies, recognizing trainees as key stakeholders in the cultivation of positive culture within academic environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信